The US indirectly asking both China and India to get out from Doklam and respect Bhutan,
but our over hyper person Taking something big Ashok321
US supports 'return of status quo' on Doklam issue: Official:
- Thread starter ashok321
- Start date
The US indirectly asking both China and India to get out from Doklam and respect Bhutan,
but our over hyper person Taking something big Ashok321
ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
You do not know how to lie either.
You are exposed. Good for nothing.
China - Bhutan dispute is age old.
You think the US does not know of it?
Hence why would the US include China when you say get out from Doklam.
It is the disputed territory between the two = China & Bhutan.
The only alien on this territory is India.
Hence the polite US warning to India alone.
good to accept that is Dispute area between China and Bhutan then why China is changing status quo
if China stopped road construction when Bhutan issued the Notice then there is no reason for Bhutan to ask India help
don't assume your self, you are nothing worth than ZERO
ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
That is between the two nations = Bhutan & China.
Why is the monkey present here between the 2 cat fight?
What is the monkey's business here?
Read my Post again you will get the Answer,
Don't Post with Over hyped relax and read and post
I don't know who you are but one thing is for sure your face right now
so don't damage your head with your Post
ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Read my Post again you will get the Answer,
Don't Post with Over hyped relax and read and post
I don't know who you are but one thing is for sure your face right now
so don't damage your head with your Post
Ok.
So you gave up, that also this easy?
Why even you start in the first place by tagging people?
Seeking attention first then you quit suddenly?
Lol.
NEXTTTTTTTTTTT
Tshering22
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 18,431
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
There was never any status quo.
Just because one country likes to bring disputes in every year of its added prosperity and expanded military status, it doesn't mean that the said dispute exists.
As much as US is showing its support, we understand the background game behind all this.
The US won't guarantee our strategic corridors and national integrity so they can take a hike.
Also, Bhutan called us and doesn't seem to be asking us to go back. So we stay.
Just because one country likes to bring disputes in every year of its added prosperity and expanded military status, it doesn't mean that the said dispute exists.
As much as US is showing its support, we understand the background game behind all this.
The US won't guarantee our strategic corridors and national integrity so they can take a hike.
Also, Bhutan called us and doesn't seem to be asking us to go back. So we stay.
you are proving every post that you don't have any knowledge about my post
read again you will get an answer for your question, I am clearly Mentioned
I am not hiding the answer from my post. so read it
you keep replying or posting as you wish with out reading it Properly
ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Since 3 months this Doklam standoff is going on.
Why was the US calm on this all the while, but now issues a statement for a status quo?
Because China has acquired a leverage by working with the US on North Korea. It stopped all the co-operation with N Korea and stopped the trade.
Now you are regurgitating with same phrases that are very common in all the forums, specially when one is clueless, speechless & trapped like you are now.
Instead of directly answering my question head on, you took a convenient detour to your advantage.
Go and solve your massive trade problems first, those that were created by your 10th pass Modi:
Why was the US calm on this all the while, but now issues a statement for a status quo?
Because China has acquired a leverage by working with the US on North Korea. It stopped all the co-operation with N Korea and stopped the trade.
Now you are regurgitating with same phrases that are very common in all the forums, specially when one is clueless, speechless & trapped like you are now.
Instead of directly answering my question head on, you took a convenient detour to your advantage.
Go and solve your massive trade problems first, those that were created by your 10th pass Modi:
Dem!god
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4,547
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
Amazed.... This is your level of understanding. Atleast complete your schooling first.
No wonder your original country isn't faring well in many parameters.
From his comment, i am sure he should be Chinese because when ever we say something they won't care about that they will keep posting some thing the same attitude i am see from his post
Neither we trust US nor cheerleaders with there knickers on.
ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Look at what the US says:
So its India alone. The US is not in conversation with China on this.
This clearly means that they are approaching India for a status quo, hence a retreat IS required from India and NOT China.
China has International clout, Finance & Military power, against such, India seems to be an orphan with paltry 275 billion yearly revenue, no UNSC seat and importing 70% of its military hardware needs.
So its India alone. The US is not in conversation with China on this.
This clearly means that they are approaching India for a status quo, hence a retreat IS required from India and NOT China.
China has International clout, Finance & Military power, against such, India seems to be an orphan with paltry 275 billion yearly revenue, no UNSC seat and importing 70% of its military hardware needs.
Similar threads
