What's new

US should endorse India's UNSC bid, says McCain

Mirza Jatt

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 26, 2010
Messages
5,701
Reaction score
-5
Country
India
Location
India
US should endorse India's UNSC bid, says McCain

The United States should fully back India's [ Images ] pursuit of permanent membership of the powerful UN Security Council, John McCain [ Images ], the top Republican leader said, days after President Barack Obama [ Images ] described the issue as "very difficult and complicated".

"If we want India to join us in sharing the responsibilities for international peace and security, then the world's largest democracy needs to have a seat at the high table of international politics," Senator McCain said at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "The United States should fully back India's pursuit of permanent membership on the UN Security Council," he underlined on Friday at the Washington-based think tank.

Ahead of his visit, President Barack Obama had told PTI that the issue of India's permanent membership of the UN Security Council was "very difficult and complicated". Without committing himself to a firmer support for India's bid for permanent seat in UNSC, Obama said, "I do also expect to discuss India's role as an actor on the global stageduring my visit."

McCain's endorsement for India's bid for the UN Security Council gain significance given the bipartisan nature of support on Indo-US relationship between and the emergence of Republican Party as a strong force after the November mid-term polls, in which it gained majority in the US House of Representatives. "India must be represented in the foundational institutions of the global order. The United States should push for India's inclusion in the International Energy Agency, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, and those parts of the global non-proliferation regime from which India is still excluded," he said.

McCain, who contested unsuccessfully against Obama in the US presidential polls in 2008, said India is also naturally poised to lead in the global promotion of democratic governance, which is increasingly a norm of the international order that our nations should foster. "It is my hope that the US can work together with India to develop its own national institutions for the promotion of democracy worldwide. "In the final calculation, the most positive feature of US-India relations is our shared democratic values, and it is ultimately our success in advancing these values together that will provide the most enduring source of security for us both," he observed.

McCain underlined that the expectations for the US-India partnership was "extremely high". "If India and the US are to build a strategic partnership, we must each want it, and commit to it, and defend it in equal measure. "And though our democratic values are our greatest source of strength, it is the domestic pressures of our democratic politics that pose perhaps the single greatest danger to our emerging partnership," he said. He underlined the need to "navigate these issues with care and forethought" because "those decisions will be significantly shaped by the actions of the other".

US should endorse India's UNSC bid, says McCain - Rediff.com India News
 
.
Two McCain threads = another example of active moderation?
 
. . . . . . .
yes, they are. I would love to see them back in power. the chances of our bid for UNSC permanent will definitely get stronger.
And since we're talking about gifting a token of gratitude for what Bush did to remove nuclear embargo, I think since Republicans sweated it out for our sake, we can give that good reward to them when they get back to power in 2012 rather than BO.
 
.
not a snow flakes chance in hell of US backing India for a security council permanent seat -- Why not? India are not ready, they have a territorial problem with their nuclear and non-nuclear neighbors, internally, the society remains plagued by communal strife, the recent CWG fiasco only served to highlight internal fissures.

but of course, India does not need a permanent seat on the security council to further the agenda of the Indian state.
 
. .
not a snow flakes chance in hell of US backing India for a security council permanent seat -- Why not? India are not ready, they have a territorial problem with their nuclear and non-nuclear neighbors, internally, the society remains plagued by communal strife, the recent CWG fiasco only served to highlight internal fissures.

but of course, India does not need a permanent seat on the security council to further the agenda of the Indian state.

You are thinking like a Pakistani and not an American..those are the reason why Pakistan is against India's UNSC seat..US won't back India, but it has its own reason(something along the lines of dilution of its own powers in UN)...Which is exactly why countries like France supports India.
 
. .
Rubbish! You are thinking like an Indian, that is to say you are thinking without benefit of reason -- sound fair?

Address the issues raised if you can, but if you for the easy out, I can play that as well. And you'll end up regretting not using your head.
 
.
As long as the U.S remains in doubt over India's strategic intentions and its policies toward U.S sticky points like Iran , North Korea , the middle -east in general it with remain deliberately ambiguous about backing India at least at the official level .......McCain's words are his own ,had he been in the White House instead of Obama , he would have been certainly cautioned against such a move by policy-makers and thinktanks.

However at least at this stage the idea of U.S not backing India because of Pakistani Protests/Objections is faulty . Pakistan( Even though a close U.S ally )simply does not have enough clout for its objections to be paid any heed to....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom