What's new

US sets condition for India’s UNSC seat

The Eagle

SENIOR MODERATOR
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
24,239
Reaction score
258
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US sets condition for India’s UNSC seat
By
News Desk

October 18, 2017



News Analysis |

US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, seemingly enticed India with a permanent seat in the UN Security Council. She said that the key to India becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council is “not to touch the veto”. She also identified Russia and China as the two global powers against changes in the current structure of the Security Council.

https://www.globalvillagespace.com/ordering-form/?sid=7
“This reform of the UN Security Council is much more about the veto. The permanent five (members of the Security Council) have the ability to veto. Russia, China, the UK, the US and France and none of them want to give that up,” Ms. Haley said in an address to an event organized by US India Friendship Council.

“America’s overriding interests in Afghanistan and throughout South Asia are to eliminate terrorist safe havens that threaten us. And to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists, we will use all the elements of our national power economic diplomatic and military to pursue these goals,” was her statement.

The ambassador also said that India could help the US keep an eye on Pakistan as President Donald Trump has “taken a tougher approach to Islamabad harboring terrorists”. Noting that Trump recently announced a new strategy for combating terrorism in Afghanistan and South Asia, Haley said one of the pillars of that strategy is the development of America’s strategic partnership with India.

“America’s overriding interests in Afghanistan and throughout South Asia are to eliminate terrorist safe havens that threaten us. And to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists, we will use all the elements of our national power economic diplomatic and military to pursue these goals,” was her statement.


US DESIGNS

Nikki Haley alongside Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana holds the distinction of being top-level US officials of Indian descent. Born to Sikh parents, she converted to Methodism after marrying her husband Michael Haley and describes herself as a Christian. Her religious conversion, as well as her ethnicity, did not stop her from becoming the first female governor of South Carolina.

To stave off China, the US seeks to use India as a local Sherriff of the region, therefore, it has been quite generous with India lately through nuclear deals and calls for greater inclusion of India. It also sees India as a suitable counterweight to an increasingly independent Pakistan.

It remains to be seen whether the remarks of Nikki Haley are mere statements of a US official of Indian heritage or an indicator of US designs for the region. In September 2017, a resolution supporting India’s bid for the UNSC seat was presented in the US House of representatives. However, before President Obama, the US was severely against UNSC reforms. The case of India has been dogged by factors such as the Kashmir conflict, no signature of the NPT and great power wrangling.

The shift of the US from opposing to allowing more members in the UNSC probably stems from the perception of the US’s place in global affairs. After the departure of George W Bush, the US has started to see itself no more as the lone power and perceives challenges from a new multipolar order lead by China and Russia. To stave off China, the US seeks to use India as a local Sherriff of the region, therefore, it has been quite generous with India lately through nuclear deals and calls for greater inclusion of India. It also sees India as a suitable counterweight to an increasingly independent Pakistan.


NO VETO

However, the US is also following pragmatism. While it supports a permanent membership of India in the UNSC, it also seeks assurances to curtail the use of Veto. The Veto has been a rather problematic point for the US in current history. While it greatly used Veto primarily to safeguard Israel in the global arena, it got a taste of its own medicine when Russia and China utilized it in various instances such as Syria and Iran.

While what Nikki Haley’s remarks would achieve remains to be seen but it can be assured that the US is considering India as the most useful state in the coming Multipolar era.

Therefore it will be wary of any other power using the power of Veto as a checkmate for US endeavors in the UN. This has been reciprocated by India as well. New Delhi has offered to forgo veto power initially as a bargaining chip to get the permanent seat. “The issue of veto is important, but we should not allow it to have a veto over the process of Council reform itself,” India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Syed Akbaruddin, said in March.


While what Nikki Haley’s remarks would achieve remains to be seen but it can be assured that the US is considering India as the most useful state in the coming Multipolar era.
 
.
Well this just is a great time to discuss unsc permanent membership.

Like atleast spend lobby money more appropriately.
 
.
America ney India ko truck ki battee kay peechay lagaya hua hey 20-saal sey.

Nothing is going to happen in this regard and India will never have the permanent seat in UNSC. The simple reason is that China will never agree.

America only wants to use India for its own interests - i.e., against China.
 
.
With out veto UNSC permanent seat is not at all worthy.

UNSC is like an aristocracy , what is the use of yelling democracy and freedom if you cannot change the UNSC structure.

Majority of nations in this world support India for UNSC permanent seat and NSG membership. Both these memberships are denied based on the reservations of some countries like china. This is a shame.

It is also a shame for US to utter the above statement.

US and other permanent members should decide if they want to keep the relevancy of UN by introducing reforms and including India in UNSC or make UN an irrelevant organisation.
 
. .
India should not be given permanent seat at UN Security Council.

It is a war mongering country. It fought wars with 3 neighbors. exchange of fire several times with a 4th. Does have serious conflict with every neighbor.
What about US?
 
.
Where did she say any conditions?
All she said is that none of the P5 want to give up Veto & blamed Russia& China to be against USA reforms.
 
.
Just a memory came across mind that lastly it was India that denied UNHRC access to IoK so wouldn't opposition use the same as an objection w.r.t. India obeying UN fully. On one hand our Indian friends here says, in UNHRC episode, that UN is useless while on other hand India itself is striving day & night for subjected seat but not complying where it doesn't serve the purpose. In my opinion alone, I can be wrong on this point, this objection as well can be raised during session for voting.
 
.
India should not be given permanent seat at UN Security Council.

It is a war mongering country. It fought wars with 3 neighbors. exchange of fire several times with a 4th. Does have serious conflict with every neighbor.

If that is your concern then what about US?:coffee:
 
. .
One step at a time. Secure the seat. Can always get veto later
 
. . .
What is important to note that its not only China who will put this Indian ambition into dustbin but the so called Indian ally, Russia is also not interested.

I dont know why yanks are talking about matters which are beyond their reach and scope. Indians should have known before sucking on this lollipop.
 
.
Majority of nations in this world support India for UNSC permanent seat

They dont give a toss about india

India demands that when they get to the end of the rainbow they csn keep the pot of gold, they smile, pat india on your head and say "sure sure when we get to the end of the rainbow you can keep the pot of gold"



The U.N security council wont reform they have no reason to they are simply diluting their own influence and power if they do


They are all content blaming each other on why they won't allow a country with rampant hunger, poverty and open defecation into their elite group

The U.S simply wants a lackey in the region and India fits the bill perfectly

They know China is THE rising power of the world and they want a block

Kings and emperors have always sought out ambitious obnoxious twats like india to fo their bidding knowing where and how to pull their strings
 
.
Back
Top Bottom