US principal objective is to oust Assad, not eliminate ISIL: Analyst

[Husnainshah]

An American political analyst in Virginia says defeating Daesh (ISIL) is not a US policy priority and the United States has instead focused on overthrowing the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

“It has to be understood that the principle objective that the United States has in Syria and Iraq is not the defeat of ISIS [or ISIL], that at best is the secondary concern. The principal concern that the United States has is the overthrow of the government of President Assad in Syria,” said Keith Preston, the chief editor and director of AttacktheSystem.com.

“In fact, President Obama recently made a statement to that effect. President Obama was criticizing Russia, saying President Putin’s strategy has been primarily to defeat ISIS and to do so by protecting the government of President Assad which is the primary bulwark against ISIS,” he told Press TV on Sunday.

“If the government of President Assad falls in Syria, then ISIS will most likely come to dominate the entire nation. So the best way to defeat ISIS is to maintain the regime of President Assad, perhaps bolstered by the presence of foreign assistance which is the kind of assistance that the Russians are currently providing,” he added.

On Sunday, former CIA Director Jack Devine said that the United States has been very ineffective when it comes to combating terrorist groups like Daesh (ISIL) in the Middle East.

“You have a group in ISIS today that is frankly uncivilized. These folks could get stronger and stronger. We basically have to destroy ISIS over there,” Devine said, adding that “if there’s blame to be put, it’s on our failure to have done that by this point.”

Preston said “Jack Devine is correct… but he doesn’t really go into details concerning why that is the case.”

“President Obama has actually criticized the Russians for their efforts to protect the regime of President Assad, which is the principal barrier to the expansion of ISIS, and the reason for that is that the overthrow of the regime of President Assad is the United States’ primary objective in the Middle East, or at least in the Levant region at present,” the analyst said.

“The United States has always regarded independent regimes that are in opposition to Washington in the Middle East as a far greater threat than these on the ground terrorist organizations like Daesh, or like al-Qaeda and so forth,” he stated.

“The effect of American foreign policy in the Middle East is to dismantle regimes that are in fact bulwark against these kinds of terrorist and insurgent organizations,” Preston noted.

ISIL terrorists, who were initially trained by the CIA in Jordan in 2012 to destabilize the Syrian government, now control parts of Syria and Iraq. They have been engaged in crimes against humanity in the areas under their control.

Observers say while the US and its allies claim they are fighting against terrorist groups like ISIL, they in fact helped create and train those organizations to affect their policies in the Middle East.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

However there is no known authority that can enforce the guilt , as long as their local media remains silent

1960's was last time the media was open about reporting wars which started anti war demonstration , which peaked towards end of decade

However , now the media is strictly one sided

Questionable realities are only discussed in Universities or higher education centers general public only views what the media wants it to see

Which obviously raises the Anti Islam , behavior in general public , and this is enforced by the local news radios , night talk shows , and religious shows and many other outlets

Example many rural folks think Obama is a Muslim


Throughout the 80's it was known what happened in Afghanistan and who created the forces
yet , fast forward 00's media remained reluctant to discuss the topic, and in wiki historic areas
instead now emphasis is that regional partners helped create the entities.


Same with groups that emerged from Iraq , and Libya , all are result of occupation and destruction of legitimate governments (dictator they may be but still stable countries)


Now, a general view , that media posts stupid article like
"What makes a person become radicalized?"

Or they treat the radicalization as a zit that appears on a person's face , oh my god where did this little thing emerged from ?

The answer is very simple , that due to neglect of policies , and failed efforts in occupation by force , and regional destruction of governments has given birth to the group. Not to mention it was aided in part by "International" partners to topple a leader in Syria.

When leaders , pass resolutions (or not in some cases) which causes emergence of menace
they don't take responsibility ! They simply walk away .. after their desire or lust of blood fades as they age.


When they get old and are retired the politicians , then smirk and claim

"Hey .... I did best .... history will see me as a just person" or "I think the region is safer now"


There is never a admittance of "FAILED" policies .. just more policies and camera sessions , of 100 dollar donation to effected people hey look

Your whole family died , take this 100 dollar bill and don't be radicalized no go on ... before I take back 50

 

[oproh]

America's principal objective is to protect their isis buddies from Russian bombs.