Pakistani Fighter
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 9,124
- Reaction score
- -5
China MUST increase its Navy by inducting more modern Subs, Aircraft Carriers, Type 055s, Type 054Bs, Type 056s and patrol American Pacific
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ar-warheads-global-times-editor-idUSKBN22K1EEChina should start increasing it's nuclear stock pile , USA only understand the language of power
NEW YORK -- As tensions rise in the South China Sea, a top U.S. Army official underscored in comments made public Friday the importance of developing and deploying new weapons systems that can potentially break Chinese defenses and securing the Indo-Pacific through robust partnerships in the region.
"We're going to have midrange missiles that can sink ships," said the Army's chief of staff, Gen. James McConville, in a discussion streamed by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. "We think that's very, very important for the anti-access/area denial capabilities that we may face," he added, referring to the strategy known as A2/AD for short.
McConville also mentioned "long-range precision fires," such as hypersonic missiles, and "tactical fires with extended range" as priority areas.
"We certainly want to bring to the national leadership options that they can use if required for an anti-access/area denial capability," he said.
McConville confirmed that tests of hypersonic missiles -- in effect, America's fastest long-range weapons -- have been successful.
The event was recorded on Wednesday and aired on Friday.
Experts say deploying all these missiles would be to combat Beijing's A2/AD strategy in the South China Sea, which combines ships, missiles and sensors to keep adversaries from approaching China. If the People's Liberation Army conducts operations to take Taiwan by force, for example, then the First Island Chain -- comprising Japan's main islands, Okinawa, Taiwan, the northern Philippines and the Malay Peninsula -- would be a strategic line of defense for China.
"The so-called A2/AD by China and Russia is designed to complicate the U.S. projection of power and the combined operations of the U.S. and its closest allies like Japan," said Tom Karako, a senior fellow at CSIS. "It is targeted to drive a wedge between the U.S. and its allies," he said.
Regarding McConville's statement, Karako said "what is important is that he is reaffirming that the U.S. is sticking to its strategy" of deploying strategic, operational and tactical weapons to counter these programs.
Scholars Stephen Biddle and Ivan Olerich foresaw the A2/AD situation in a 2016 article for the journal International Security.
"Many analysts worry that improvements in Chinese missile, sensor, guidance, and other technologies will enable China to deny the U.S. military access to parts of the Western Pacific that the United States has long controlled," they wrote.
"In this new era, the United States will possess a sphere of influence around allied landmasses; China will maintain a sphere of influence over its own mainland; and a contested battlespace will cover much of the South and East China Seas wherein neither power enjoys wartime freedom of surface or air movement," they argued.
Recent events, and McConville's assertions, confirm such predictions.
McConville said securing the area will depend on strong U.S. partnerships with countries in the First Island Chain and noted the importance of standing defense agreements with Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, the Philippines and Thailand.
He was also eager for more alliances and hoped to forge a defense partnership with India. "We used to be, you know, Pacific Command," he said. "Now it's actually Indo-Pacific Command, reflecting just how important they are."
"India is a very important country in the region," and adding it in a defense partnership would be "very, very, helpful" for regional stability and security, McConville said.
But despite the recent heightening of regional tensions as both the U.S. and China flex their military muscle via exercises, the American general urged caution.
"Great-power competition does not mean that there's a great-power conflict," McConville said. "We all need to work to avoid that type of thing. But at the same time, many of these countries, they do want a free and open Indo-Pacific because ... they need to have access" for economic reasons.
"What they're interested in is really security and stability in the region," he said.
https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/In...-missile-to-pierce-China-s-anti-access-shield
Japaneses, please don't forget your lesson on WWII. Any misadventure again will caused your country in catastrophic.
japan will make a U turn on the US.
I'm just curious why despite the deluge of Indian e-bragging and chest-thumping your cowardly "army" hasn't so much as sent an angry letter. China is sitting pretty on territory you consider your own, what are you doing about it?
japan will make a U turn on the US.
This coming from an Indian...Like all their brethren, you can smell them before you see them.
500km range is hardly a threat to China when China's standard antiship missile has 540km range. not mention 1700km range of DF-21 and 4000km range of DF-26
He’s probably referring to the Precision Strike Missile. 2,400 total procurement, 1,000+ over the next five years.
It's cute that you think you'll have an "again". It's over for you, no more "again".The mistake in the "misadventure" was the FDR administration siding with CKS.
The US won't make that mistake again.
Where are you going to deploy these?
Everything looks nice when it is on paper onlyPrecision Strike Missiles will be deployed to existing HIMARS and MLRS systems in Japan and SK.
You see this new missiles baseline range is 550 km. By 2025, a multi mode seeker will be added to target ships. Then the range will be extended out to 700-800 km. And the great part? The Army doesn’t have to develop a new launch platform. It can already launch out of existing systems deployed.
So in the near term the Army is going to have a 550-800km missile that can strike land and sea targets in the Western Pacific with high precision. A huge upgrade for the Army.
And the Army is buying over 1,000 in the next five years.
Remember what happened to the Army's future combat system?
On paper?