What's new

US oil reserves surpass those of Saudi Arabia and Russia

C130

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
8,092
Reaction score
-1
Country
United States
Location
United States
https://next.ft.com/content/7525f1dc-41d6-11e6-9b66-0712b3873ae1

Rystad Energy estimates recoverable oil in the US from existing fields, discoveries and yet undiscovered areas amounts to 264bn barrels. The figure surpasses Saudi Arabia’s 212bn and Russia’s 256bn in reserves.

The analysis of 60,000 fields worldwide, conducted over a three-year period by the Oslo-based group, shows total global oil reserves at 2.1tn barrels. This is 70 times the current production rate of about 30bn barrels of crude oil a year, Rystad Energy said on Monday.

Uncompleted wells could hold back oil price rebound
Production outlook depends on a series of holes in the ground

Recoverable reserves — those barrels that are technologically and economically feasible to extract — are analysed by the energy industry to determine company valuations and the long-term health of an oil-producing nation’s economy.

Conventional oil producers, such as Saudi Arabia, have traditionally used their huge resource riches to wield power globally, particularly among big consumer countries such as the US.

This relationship has been disrupted in recent years by hydraulic fracturing and other new technologies that have helped the US unlock vast reserves and enabled it to become more energy independent.

“There is little potential for future surprises in many other countries, but in the US there is,” said Per Magnus Nysveen, analyst at Rystad Energy, noting recent discoveries in the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico, which is the nation’s most prolific oil producing area. “Three years ago the US was behind Russia, Canada and Saudi Arabia.”

More than half of the US’s remaining oil reserves are in unconventional shale oil, Rystad Energy data show. Texas alone holds more than 60bn barrels of shale oil.

Other global oil reserves data, like the closely watched BP Statistical Review that is based on official reporting from national authorities, show the US still ranks behind countries such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, Canada, Iraq, Venezuela and Kuwait.

Rystad Energy said government data across the world are collected using a range of metrics that are often opaque. Many countries’ numbers often include yet undiscovered oil.

While the reserves numbers are crucial, the cost of production is just as vital, said Richard Mallinson at London-based consultancy Energy Aspects.

“Reserves numbers matter but lots of other factors also determine short and long term returns from what the oil companies and nations hold,” said Mr Mallinson. “The rise in prominence of the US doesn’t diminish the role of Saudi Arabia or Russia, which have some of the cheapest to produce oil in the world.”

Opec nations, led by Saudi Arabia, have over the past two years allowed oil prices to fall to ensure their long-term market share is secured over higher cost producers.

Although US shale oil has become more economical to produce — costs have halved over the past two years to below $40 a barrel in some instances — Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern producers still pump oil for less than $10 a barrel.

“There is a sweet spot for conventional producers in Opec. They want prices high enough to generate solid revenues to fund social spending in their countries, but not high enough to make too much expensive oil economically feasible,” added Mr Mallinson.

The US shale boom was a factor behind the recent oil price collapse that toppled the Brent crude benchmark from a mid-2014 high of $115 a barrel to below $30 earlier this year.
 
.
OPEC is finished. North America holds more oil than the entire Middle East and Russia combined.
 
.
World is already moving towards renewable energy sources and most of the European countries will be 100% on renewable sources ....so our discoveries are late.
 
.
World is already moving towards renewable energy sources and most of the European countries will be 100% on renewable sources ....so our discoveries are late.

Oil will remain relevant at least for foreseeable future. Renewable are still very expensive in comparison to oil. It will take a bit of time for the renewable technologies to be mature.
 
.
World is already moving towards renewable energy sources and most of the European countries will be 100% on renewable sources ....so our discoveries are late.
Oil will not die in our life time. its uses will go on beyond our expiry date even if it is in reduced capacity.
 
.
OPEC is finished. North America holds more oil than the entire Middle East and Russia combined.
cost of recovering this oil 5-10X more sir

cost of OPEC oil is 10-15$ a barrel vs atleast 70$ for shale and tight of USA
 
.
World is already moving towards renewable energy sources and most of the European countries will be 100% on renewable sources ....so our discoveries are late.

Nope, even if you only have electric cars and 100% renewable energy, every country in the world will still use oil, in a different format of course, that's why you are seeing heavy investments into chemical plants.

cost of recovering this oil 5-10X more sir

cost of OPEC oil is 10-15$ a barrel vs atleast 70$ for shale and tight of USA

70? its around 35, US energy reserves are good for themselves and can to an extent compete in some markets
 
. .
Oil will remain relevant at least for foreseeable future. Renewable are still very expensive in comparison to oil. It will take a bit of time for the renewable technologies to be mature.
Bro, I disagree with you since enery is my research area. Wind energy is comparable or even cheaper in Europe than fossil fuel based power generation. Oil will be used for value added products in petrochemical industry but the road transport, trains, industrial and residential needs will be met with the renewable sources. Only air transport will utilise oil for the next 50-60 yrs.
 
.
cost of recovering this oil 5-10X more sir

cost of OPEC oil is 10-15$ a barrel vs atleast 70$ for shale and tight of USA


that's the dilemma sir. OPEC can't survive with oil under $100 dollars so it'll go back up to $100 which makes shale very profitable.


shale costs have gone down signically because of new technology and technique.

actually the cost to produce oil shale is below $60 dollars now for most plays :cheers:
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Why-US-Shale-Is-Not-Capitulating-Yet.html


while yes Middle East oil is still cheap to produce they still need oil over $100 to fund their social spending.
 
.
that's the dilemma sir. OPEC can't survive with oil under $100 dollars so it'll go back up to $100 which makes shale very profitable.


shale costs have gone down signically because of new technology and technique.

actually the cost to produce oil shale is below $60 dollars now for most plays :cheers:
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Why-US-Shale-Is-Not-Capitulating-Yet.html


while yes Middle East oil is still cheap to produce they still need oil over $100 to fund their social spending.


Good if the oil prices stay low (dead cheap) or else these Arabs countries like Saudi Arabia will continue funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE131801_a.html
 
.
Thats actually great, eventhough european countries and USA is tilting towards renewable energy and EV's are the new commodity there where the sales are increasing, this surplus oil can be sold to emerging countries like China,Pakistan and India where there will be a huge demand for oil as it'll take time to replace the gasoline vehicles.
 
.
Oil will remain relevant at least for foreseeable future. Renewable are still very expensive in comparison to oil. It will take a bit of time for the renewable technologies to be mature.
Not to mention you need energy input from oil to produce equipment for renewable s and them ship them half way across the world as there are no nuclear powered container ships.
 
. .
Good. More supplies means the price will be pushed down and benefit the world in general. It will also force the Middle East to accept modern education.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom