What's new

US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
25,259
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Now, in the interest of preventing a host of distortions regarding the statement as presented in the thread title, the question posed to the US spokesperson by the Indian journalist was in the context of "State support", and even tried to imply US collusion with Pakistan.
==========
US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence


WASHINGTON: The United States has cautioned against making any assumptions linking Pakistan to the latest violence in the Indian occupied Kashmir, while also brushing aside the notion that last week's meeting between Army Chief General Raheel Sharif and Secretary of State John Kerry was somehow connected to the flare-up in the Uri area.

A State Department spokesperson, while expressing concern over violence in the disputed Himalayan region divided between the two countries, also urged India and Pakistan to hold dialogue on the Kashmir issue.

“I think that you're conflating a couple of things. Obviously, we know the Secretary and the army chief of staff had a very productive discussion on Sunday on a range of security-related issues, and again, we're concerned about any violence in Kashmir, and I wouldn't jump to conclusions here,” Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told an Indian journalist in response to his questions at the daily briefing.


The premise of the question sought to put the blame on Pakistan for Friday's incident and the questioner also wanted to know the United State's position on whether was a link between the meeting and the fighting involving militants and Indian soldiers in Uri in Indian-held Kashmir.

Also read: 17 dead as militants attack army camp in Indian-held Kashmir

“No, I was saying - I actually was trying not to accept the premise of the question,” the spokesperson emphasised, when asked if she accepted the premise in the question about who might have been behind the violence.

When asked if the US does not know whether there was any Pakistani involvement, the spokesperson cautioned against any assumptions: “I wouldn't assume anything.”

According to media reports, 11 Indian soldiers and six militants were killed when fighting broke out in Uri, rocking the region ahead of Indian prime minister Narendra Modibs visit to Indian-held Kashmir.

Reiterating Washington's position on addressing the Kashmir dispute, the spokesperson said: “So obviously we're concerned about any violence in Kashmir. Our policy on Kashmir hasn't changed. We still believe that the pace and the scope and character of India and Pakistan's dialogue on Kashmir is for those two countries to determine, of course.”

She also added that American embassies in both capitals, Islamabad and New Delhi, “have raised these types of incidents with their respective host governments and certainly encouraged both to continue working together on the issue.”

Later, a senior State Department official said the United States strongly condemns Friday's terrorist attacks in Kashmir, which claimed the lives of innocent civilians, military, and police personnel.

“The United States remains firmly committed to working in close partnership with India to defeat terrorism in all its forms. Our hearts go out to the families of those affected by this deplorable attack,” a statement issued Friday evening said.
US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence - Pakistan - DAWN.COM
 
. .
.
US cautions against linking Pakistan to Indian Kashmir violence
By APP
Published: December 6, 2014
WASHINGTON DC: The United States has cautioned against making any assumptions linking Pakistan to the latest violence in Indian-administered Kashmir, while also brushing aside the notion that last week’s meeting between army chief General Raheel Sharif and Secretary of State John Kerry was connected to the flare-up in the Uri area.

A State Department spokesperson, while expressing concern over violence in the disputed Himalayan region divided between the two countries, also urged India and Pakistan to hold dialogue on the Kashmir issue.

“I think that you’re conflating a couple of things. Obviously, we know the secretary and the army chief of staff had a very productive discussion on Sunday on a range of security-related issues, and again, we’re concerned about any violence in Kashmir, and I wouldn’t jump to conclusions here,” Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told an Indian journalist.

According to reports, 11 Indian soldiers and six militants were killed when fighting broke out in Uri, rocking the region ahead of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Imdian Kashmir.

Reiterating Washington’s position on addressing the Kashmir dispute, the spokesperson said: “Obviously we’re concerned about any violence in Kashmir. Our policy on Kashmir hasn’t changed. We still believe that the pace and the scope and character of India and Pakistan’s dialogue on Kashmir is for those two countries to determine, of course.”

She also added that American embassies in both capitals, Islamabad and New Delhi, “have raised these types of incidents with their respective host governments and certainly encouraged both to continue working together on the issue.”
 
.
We as Americans believe India is an occupier and committing atrocities and terrorism against innocent Kashmiris. Kashmiris are the owner of their lands not Indians.
1) It's not new for US and India. US was more aggressive than now regarding kashmir. We dealt with them them and we will deal with them in the future as well. You can keep believing whatever you want.
2) An american settled pakistani's opinion is not americans point of view.
3) Move on.
 
.
.
Now, in the interest of preventing a host of distortions regarding the statement as presented in the thread title, the question posed to the US spokesperson by the Indian journalist was in the context of "State support", and even tried to imply US collusion with Pakistan.
==========
US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence


WASHINGTON: The United States has cautioned against making any assumptions linking Pakistan to the latest violence in the Indian occupied Kashmir, while also brushing aside the notion that last week's meeting between Army Chief General Raheel Sharif and Secretary of State John Kerry was somehow connected to the flare-up in the Uri area.

A State Department spokesperson, while expressing concern over violence in the disputed Himalayan region divided between the two countries, also urged India and Pakistan to hold dialogue on the Kashmir issue.

“I think that you're conflating a couple of things. Obviously, we know the Secretary and the army chief of staff had a very productive discussion on Sunday on a range of security-related issues, and again, we're concerned about any violence in Kashmir, and I wouldn't jump to conclusions here,” Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told an Indian journalist in response to his questions at the daily briefing.


The premise of the question sought to put the blame on Pakistan for Friday's incident and the questioner also wanted to know the United State's position on whether was a link between the meeting and the fighting involving militants and Indian soldiers in Uri in Indian-held Kashmir.

Also read: 17 dead as militants attack army camp in Indian-held Kashmir

“No, I was saying - I actually was trying not to accept the premise of the question,” the spokesperson emphasised, when asked if she accepted the premise in the question about who might have been behind the violence.

When asked if the US does not know whether there was any Pakistani involvement, the spokesperson cautioned against any assumptions: “I wouldn't assume anything.”

According to media reports, 11 Indian soldiers and six militants were killed when fighting broke out in Uri, rocking the region ahead of Indian prime minister Narendra Modibs visit to Indian-held Kashmir.

Reiterating Washington's position on addressing the Kashmir dispute, the spokesperson said: “So obviously we're concerned about any violence in Kashmir. Our policy on Kashmir hasn't changed. We still believe that the pace and the scope and character of India and Pakistan's dialogue on Kashmir is for those two countries to determine, of course.”

She also added that American embassies in both capitals, Islamabad and New Delhi, “have raised these types of incidents with their respective host governments and certainly encouraged both to continue working together on the issue.”

Later, a senior State Department official said the United States strongly condemns Friday's terrorist attacks in Kashmir, which claimed the lives of innocent civilians, military, and police personnel.

“The United States remains firmly committed to working in close partnership with India to defeat terrorism in all its forms. Our hearts go out to the families of those affected by this deplorable attack,” a statement issued Friday evening said.
US brushes aside assumptions linking Pakistan to Kashmir violence - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

Apparently Gen Raheel's visit to America was definitely successful. ;)
 
.
So where are all the Indians that were commenting on 'Pakistan minister terms US an unreliable' and then 'Pentagon report on this and that' ???

Oh yes, they would not be seen. Thread posted at 6:48pm, and yet the Indians have not shown up like flies............
 
.
--
Read pentagon report .. you will get idea what they want to say about who is sending terrorist and where

We are real democracy...unlike some fake democracies of third world copycats where terrorists/goons/thugs/fanatics are made soldiers and awarded PM seats.

We are "We the People" not Pentagon.:usflag::usflag:

1) It's not new for US and India. US was more aggressive than now regarding kashmir. We dealt with them them and we will deal with them in the future as well. You can keep believing whatever you want.
2) An american settled pakistani's opinion is not americans point of view.
3) Move on.

It is actually we Americans showing you middle finger and telling you we as the boss will not read Indian lines even if Indians buy weapons from USA.:sniper:

Everyone here is an immigrant, be it Pakistani, Brit, German, Italian, Arab, Chinese, Nigerian, Brazilian, etc...together they are known as Americans.
 
. .
Big deal, they have to look at their own interest too. When they indite Pakistan they don't care, but otherwise you are my best friend.
 
. .
So this bit is enough for you guys, must say it's pretty cheap. :rofl:

Not enough. But good to see that Indians are getting trolled in Washington too and not just this forum. ;)

So where are all the Indians that were commenting on 'Pakistan minister terms US an unreliable' and then 'Pentagon report on this and that' ???

Oh yes, they would not be seen. Thread posted at 6:48pm, and yet the Indians have not shown up like flies............

Indians are born trolls. Whether it is some moron on defence..pk or some journalist n Washington.
 
.
Showing middle finger means violating airspace and killing soldiers, using drones to kill civilians, performing unilateral raids to take out military targets, disregarding a countries claim and detaining military scientist holding phd...none of which is happening with India.

None of which is happening because Americans need Indian for now to counter China.

In simple words,

Obviously why would a man shoot it's bitch if the bitch is doing the job perfect?

Furthermore recently America again show middle finger by arresting so called diplomat who was fraudia and US elite police strip searching her in front of her kids and other school children and people.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom