Indus Pakistan
BANNED
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 20,487
- Reaction score
- 182
- Country
- Location
No big deal. What you see here is just the regular workings of a democracy. Read this:-
As with all nuclear-capable states, we have urged Pakistan to restrain its nuclear weapons and missile development and stressed the importance of avoiding any developments that might invite increased risk to nuclear safety, security, or strategic stability," he said.
This is standard drivel they use. This stance applies to all "nuclear capable states" thus is not Pakistan specfic.
"There is no positive sign of any improved relations with India because Pakistan justifies its nuclear proliferation as a deterrent against aggression from the outside. So the US has to get tougher with Pakistan. We have to call them out on this double game they have been playing, not this year, not last year, not five years but for the past 15 years," Higgins said.
This is Pakistan specific. should Pakistan worry. No. This represents the view of one representative ( Hiigins) probably belonging to the Indian lobby. He does not represent US policy.
He said if Pakistan falls apart or if Islamic extremists take over, it's a nightmare scenario for the US.
"It's a big country, about 180 million people, it has a lot of Islamic extremists, and it has nuclear weapons. And to have Islamic extremists with nuclear weapons is a primary goal of al-Qaeda and it would be major victory for them and the outgrowth of al-Qaeda, the Islamic state and a major defeat for us, the US," Higgins added
He is doing more for his lobby group. If this is US government policy then question why are they still pouring money into Pakistan? why are they not doing anything? Reason. It is not US policy. This guy is just earning his pay by bad mouthing Pakistan. End of story.
And the Indian Newspaper headlines are misleading. It should read "US asks all nuclear capable states to restrain their nuclear and missile programs".
As with all nuclear-capable states, we have urged Pakistan to restrain its nuclear weapons and missile development and stressed the importance of avoiding any developments that might invite increased risk to nuclear safety, security, or strategic stability," he said.
This is standard drivel they use. This stance applies to all "nuclear capable states" thus is not Pakistan specfic.
"There is no positive sign of any improved relations with India because Pakistan justifies its nuclear proliferation as a deterrent against aggression from the outside. So the US has to get tougher with Pakistan. We have to call them out on this double game they have been playing, not this year, not last year, not five years but for the past 15 years," Higgins said.
This is Pakistan specific. should Pakistan worry. No. This represents the view of one representative ( Hiigins) probably belonging to the Indian lobby. He does not represent US policy.
He said if Pakistan falls apart or if Islamic extremists take over, it's a nightmare scenario for the US.
"It's a big country, about 180 million people, it has a lot of Islamic extremists, and it has nuclear weapons. And to have Islamic extremists with nuclear weapons is a primary goal of al-Qaeda and it would be major victory for them and the outgrowth of al-Qaeda, the Islamic state and a major defeat for us, the US," Higgins added
He is doing more for his lobby group. If this is US government policy then question why are they still pouring money into Pakistan? why are they not doing anything? Reason. It is not US policy. This guy is just earning his pay by bad mouthing Pakistan. End of story.
And the Indian Newspaper headlines are misleading. It should read "US asks all nuclear capable states to restrain their nuclear and missile programs".
Last edited: