What's new

UK court orders payment of $28.7m to Broadsheet from Pakistan High Commission accounts

Norwegian

BANNED
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
19,001
Reaction score
11
Country
Israel
Location
Norway
UK court orders payment of $28.7m to Broadsheet from Pakistan High Commission accounts
Court order comes amid NAB slackness in payment of penalty in lost case
Hasnaat Malik| December 31, 2020

2251540-gavellawcourtx-1593248244-400x230.jpg



ISLAMABAD:

A high court in the United Kingdom has ordered to debit Rs4.5 billion from the accounts of the Pakistan High Commission in London over non-payment of penalty by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to the foreign asset recovery firm Broadsheet LLC.
The Foreign Office sources told The Express Tribune that the high court in London had ordered for debiting millions of dollars from the accounts of the Pakistan High Commission in the UK by December 30.
In view of court order, the United Bank Limited UK wrote a letter to the Pakistan High Commission on December 29, requesting it to provide written payment instructions with debit account details to facilitate the payment of $28,706,533.35 in line with Final Third Party Order issued by high court.
The bank also told the high commission that in case of non-recipient of the written payment instructions by December 30, the bank would have no choice but to proceed with unilaterally debiting the high commission’s accounts to meet the payment amount stipulated in the court order.
The sources informed that around Rs4.5 billion ($26,153,783.34) NAB amount was lying in the UBL, London account, which is operated in name of Pakistan High Commission in UK.
The high commission has sent a communication to UBL Chief Executive Officer Brain Firth, conveying that any attempt by the bank to proceed with unilaterally debiting their accounts to make the payment would be a violation of the international law and a breach of trust that would impact the future relationship with UBL.
As per the court order, the deadline for payment expired on Thursday (December 31). However, Foreign Office officials claimed that account had not been deducted. The sources said that due to NAB’s slackness, Pakistan faced additional loss of millions of dollars.
In November 2018, the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) awarded penalty of $17 million to the anti-corruption watchdog. Later $3 million case cost was added to the award. In March 2019, the LCIA awarded $20 million final award.
However, NAB did not pay that amount. And due to interest rate, the award amount reached $28.7 million by December, 2020. Earlier, the NAB officials had wrongly paid $5 million in past. Now the country faced around $14 million additional loss due to NAB’s negligence.
Senior lawyers have already demanded stern action against the NAB officials, responsible for this loss. Until now, more than Rs2 billion had been spent on the litigation.


Case history
Based in the Isle of Man, the Broadsheet LLC was hired by NAB during Musharraf’s regime to trace the hidden assets of 200 Pakistanis, including former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and former president Asif Zardari in foreign countries. NAB terminated its agreement with Broadsheet in 2003. The firm’s claim against Pakistan was worth at least $600 million.
Broadsheet’s dispute with NAB has a convoluted history. The company was established by Colorado businessman Jerry James. It entered into liquidation proceedings in the Isle of Man in 2005, before being dissolved but revived again.
Meanwhile, James established a Colorado company with the same name and negotiated an agreement with NAB in 2008 that purported to settle the dispute for $5 million, which the graft buster’s officials paid.
James died in 2011, reportedly after jumping off the fifth-floor balcony of a Paris hotel. However, NAB did not conduct inquiry into the “fake deal”, wherein $5 million of public money was apparently embezzled in 2008.
Legal experts believed that due to the alleged fake settlements, the LCIA awarded penalty of millions of dollars to Pakistan. In August 2016, the International Tribunal Judge Sir Anthony Evans upheld Broadsheet’s arguments that the 2008 settlement was not binding on it, as James had no authority to act on the company’s behalf at that time.
The same international tribunal held that Pakistan was liable to pay damages as NAB had wrongfully repudiated an asset recovery agreement with the Broadsheet and committed a tort of civil conspiracy by entering into a sham settlement with a former Broadsheet executive.
The tribunal ruled that the Broadsheet was entitled to damages in an amount to be determined. Broadsheet was represented by Stuart Newberger of Crowell & Moring in Washington, DC.
Later, the quantum stage started wherein the Broadsheet relied on information gathered by a joint investigation team (JIT) established by the Supreme Court of Pakistan to examine evidence concerning the Sharif family’s holdings.
The Broadsheet submitted a forensic report from the security firm Stroz Friedberg, analysing the parts of the JIT report that were made public, while Pakistan had submitted a counter-report prepared by FTI Consulting. Former NAB chairman Lt Gen (retd) Amjad Hussain had also recorded his statement before the tribunal.
---
Pakistani authorities live in fools paradise. They believe if they ignore international penalties, nothing will happen...

@Horus @ziaulislam @Mav3rick @Jungibaaz @Tameem @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE @AsianLion @Zibago @Path-Finder @Mugen @Mrc @koolio @Morpheus
 
. . .
It doesn’t matter look at the bigger picture this cost is nothing compared to put criminals behind bar and for political engineering. :lol:
---
Pakistani authorities live in fools paradise. They believe if they ignore international penalties, nothing will happen...

What you mean by Pakistani authorities can you be more specific on this one.
 
.
It doesn’t matter look at the bigger picture this cost is nothing compared to put criminals behind bar and for political engineering. :lol:
Are you calling Musharrafs NRO that ended all corruption cases and terminated this Broadsheet company's contract political engineering?
What you mean by Pakistani authorities can you be more specific on this one.
NAB specifically should have payed the sum after they lost case in UK court. Delaying led to current situation
 
. .
this is Britain taking a stab at Pakistan. That means Britain will protect the haram kabaria(and the tooi wal poojari will claim that it is a 'sher' like move by the mian, why are we cursed with these bc's)

Its time to push sales of JF17 to argentina.
 
.
Yes if court orders


Embassy accounts come under Geneva convention and they cannot be frozen according to my knowledge.

If they were they will b unfrozen on 2nd January that's the next working day according to my knowledge.

Embassy and accounts premises and properties with diplomatic immunity Donot come under court jurisdiction

Seems like a semi cooked news being peddled by pak media.
 
. . . . .
This is the reason why Pakistan has been so messed up, short cuts don't work in other countries, this is clearly a bungled case with NAB failing to pay the amount on time.
 
.
this is Britain taking a stab at Pakistan. That means Britain will protect the haram kabaria(and the tooi wal poojari will claim that it is a 'sher' like move by the mian, why are we cursed with these bc's)

Its time to push sales of JF17 to argentina.
Better kill the snake in Whatever shithole he is in!
 
.
Tbh you have to feel sorry for Pakistan on this one. It looks like NAB was stitched up by the American businessman. The courts seen to have been very unsympathetic too. I'm not sure how Pakistan's lawyers played this in court, but they weren't totally in the wrong.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom