dude, i suggest you go and get another masala dosa - may be you are filled with some cow dung denial. Naturalisation application means - application to take up citizenship of another country.
They were and are indian citizens; they are recent immigrants. They used stupid gigaba to 'expedite' their naturalisation process; their wives were not even entitled to it.
One brother never renounced his indian citizenship but kept it; while holding an RSA passport; it contravenes indian citizenship law. THey kept NRI status which is a loophole.
Go to Saharanpur where they were several months back.
Lord.... I have a good couple of whips ready to fix these curry munchers.
Just read all the trasceipt at Daily Maverick where all their exploits since coming to our country are well documented in legal documents.
Indian is always an indian ... a coolie never will become anything else.
The public protector's investigation followed two complaints lodged in terms of the Executive Members’ Ethics Act, 1998, by DA MP Haniff Hoosen and EFF MP Floyd Shivambu.
citizen.co.za
Gigaba violated ethics code in Gupta naturalisation case, says public protector
The public protector's investigation followed two complaints lodged in terms of the Executive Members’ Ethics Act, 1998, by DA MP Haniff Hoosen and EFF MP Floyd Shivambu.
Minister of home affairs Malusi Gigaba. Picture: ANA
The public protector has found that former home affairs minister Gigaba did not abuse the powers he was afforded in terms of the South African Citizenship Amendment Act, 2010, when granting certificates of early naturalisation to his alleged acquaintances, Ajay Gupta and family.
This has been corrected by the Office of the Public Protector, which, in its earlier report released by acting Public Protector Kholeka Gcaleka, erroneously said the former minister had abused his powers.
According to the amended report, the former minister exercised his discretion in terms of section 5(9) of the Act, to waive the requirements set out in section 5(1)(c) following him taking into consideration the motivation submitted by officials of the department, who were responsible for processing the early naturalisation application of the Gupta family.
However, Gigaba acted in breach of the Executive Ethics Code when he failed to submit the names of persons who were granted South African citizenship under exceptional circumstances to Parliament every year, as required in terms section 5(9)(b) of the South African Citizenship Act, 1995.
ALSO READ: Molefe, Gigaba and their alleged backpacks of Gupta cash
“She [Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane] further found that Mr Gigaba misrepresented facts in a press conference held on 6 March 2018 when he informed the media that Mr Atul Kumar Gupta was not a citizen of Republic of South Africa. Mr Gigaba conceded to furnishing incorrect information during the press conference in question.
“Even though he rectified his error in a press briefing the following day, the former minister broke the public trust placed upon him in terms of Paragraph 4.1.3 of the Parliament Ethics Code,” reads the report.
“Mr Gigaba conceded to furnishing incorrect information during the press conference in question.
Even though he rectified his error in a press briefing the following day, the former minister broke the public trust placed upon him in terms of Paragraph 4.1.3 of the Parliament Ethics Code,” reads the report.
The public protector’s investigation followed two complaints lodged in terms of the Executive Members’ Ethics Act 1998 by DA MP Haniff Hoosen and EFF MP Floyd Shivambu, on 3 November 2017 and 13 March 2018 respectively.
In his complaint, Hoosen alleged that Gigaba had failed to comply with the provisions of Section 5(9)(b) of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995, which requires the minister of home affairs to, “within 14 days after the commencement of the sittings of Parliament in each year”, table in Parliament the names of persons granted South African citizenship “under exceptional circumstances…” and in doing so, violated the Executive Ethics Code.
Shivambu had alleged that Gigaba abused the provisions of the South African Citizenship Amendment Act No 17 of 2010 when he granted his acquaintances, the Gupta family, early naturalisation. He further alleged that, “on the 6th of March 2018, Gigaba called a press conference to continue spreading fabrications and dishonesties regarding the Guptas’ citizenship status. Gigaba together with the DG [director-general] of Home Affairs told the media that Mr Atul and Mr Ajay Gupta are not citizens of South Africa”.
Though Gigaba has been found to have acted in breach of the Executive Ethics Code, any remedial action against him would serve no purpose since he had resigned.
ALSO READ: Malusi Gigaba was ‘facilitator for Guptas at SAA’
The DG has, however, been directed to consider taking appropriate action against departmental officials who were involved in the naturalisation of Ajay Gupta and family, for their failure to exercise due diligence.
Following the allegations against him in 2018, Gigaba denied helping the Guptas to gain early naturalisation.
Gigaba said at the time that Ajay Gupta’s naturalisation under his tenure didn’t happen as the Gupta brother did not renounce his Indian citizenship, which the process required.
This article has been updated with the correct information regarding the abuse of power.
Compiled by Vhahangwele Nemakonde
www.ndtv.com
