What's new

U.S. slams Baghdad bombers as ‘enemies of Islam’ after Eid attacks

During Saddam would you give the south autonomy ? No...
So your simply not looking to solve anything but your anti shia.
Saddam rule

- No terrorism
- No sectarianism
- Stable

Post Saddam rule

- Sectarianism
- Terrorism
- Puppet govts
- Lawless country

There is a big difference between before and now. We all know the Shias started the killing those who has name of Umar, Abu Bakr, Aisha and Usman then randomly killing Suuni Muslims when Maliki was installed in 2006. So, don't accuse the Suuni of sectarianism. The blame goes to Tehran and Iraqi Shiites. That's why it's impossible to keep the country stable when there is a Shia govts who rule; look at Syria, Iraq, Pakistan and Lebanon. We don't know what will happen in post Syria because there are large numbers of Iraqis in Syria.
 
.
Saddam rule

- No terrorism
- No sectarianism
- Stable

Post Saddam rule

- Sectarianism
- Terrorism
- Puppet govts
- Lawless country

And Saddam built all that ?
Saddam became president in 1979, starts a war 1 year later for 8 years buying tons of military equipment using Iraq’s advanced economy + 20 billion from GCC bringing Iraq into bankruptcy and debts.
The Iraqi dinar was 3 times worth the US dollar.
The country was on its way to industrialization reaching world standards and theres much more to say.

^^ Those achievements were led by leaders such as Qasim and Hassan Bakr

Saddam’s achievements were destruction, no major project took place during his rule as president. He brought sanctions to the country, gave shatt al arab to Iran - Arvand rud, then he also made mistakes with the Kurdish issue.

Now it’s this government that has to clean the mess created by Saddam and the US, Saddam’s stupidness which invited the US.
Get the secterian **** out of my nose.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom