Turkish Missile Programs
- Thread starter Kompromat
- Start date
Zarvan
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 54,470
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Which missile is this ???
GlobalMillitary96
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,344
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
J-600T Yildirim
Saithan
MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2010
- Messages
- 3,771
- Reaction score
- 1
Is that a new type of warhead ?
UzaySan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2017
- Messages
- 673
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Can roketsan build rocket tapa?
It would be interesting to compare them with the original B-611 and other improved Chinese B-12 series.
MMM-E
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,720
- Reaction score
- -44
- Country
- Location
go and compare Chinese Missiles with original Soviet Missiles
It also would be interesting
Last edited:
IblinI
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Blamed your army for purchasing it with tot if it hurts your little ego.
MMM-E
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,720
- Reaction score
- -44
- Country
- Location
Yes we got Soviet Missile/MLRS technology via China because of Turkey has agreed to allow Soviet Aircraft Carrier to pass through the Bosphorus strait on its way to China
Win-Win solution
IblinI
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 4,999
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The ToT contract was signed in 1996 and the Ac incident happened in 2000-2002, but any way you must always be right, Mr mme.
I am out, peace.
Last edited:
UkroTurk
BANNED
- Joined
- May 7, 2015
- Messages
- 3,610
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
It would be interesting somewhere else but not in here.
-------
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2009
- Messages
- 5,801
- Reaction score
- 58
- Country
- Location
I don't know dude, no information was passed on with this image, we can only speculate. With the spacers, I presume it will utilise a casing such as an aero fairing. So, could very well be for HISAR missiles...
-------
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2009
- Messages
- 5,801
- Reaction score
- 58
- Country
- Location
@cabatli_53 bro, has the Atmaca anti-ship missiles spec been revised, in the latest journal from SSM it is saying that Atmaca has an 88kg warhead?
Suitable for all weather conditions, ATMACA
Missile is super sea-skimming, resistant to
countermeasures, has target update, retargeting
and mission abort capability, advanced mission
planning system (3D routing), and is effective
against stationary and moving anti-surface
warfare (ASuW) targets. ATMACA has Global
Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System/
Barometric Altimeter/Radar Altimeter capability
and finds its target using its active radar seeker
with high accuracy. With its 220+ km range, 88 kg
TNT equivalent high explosive blast fragmentation
warhead and datalink capability, ATMACA threatens
its targets beyond the line of sight. The data link
capability also enables ATMACA to have target
update, re-attack and mission abort features.
Suitable for all weather conditions, ATMACA
Missile is super sea-skimming, resistant to
countermeasures, has target update, retargeting
and mission abort capability, advanced mission
planning system (3D routing), and is effective
against stationary and moving anti-surface
warfare (ASuW) targets. ATMACA has Global
Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System/
Barometric Altimeter/Radar Altimeter capability
and finds its target using its active radar seeker
with high accuracy. With its 220+ km range, 88 kg
TNT equivalent high explosive blast fragmentation
warhead and datalink capability, ATMACA threatens
its targets beyond the line of sight. The data link
capability also enables ATMACA to have target
update, re-attack and mission abort features.
Similar threads
