What's new

Traditional chinese costume . We eliminate your misunderstanding of Chinese costume and hairstyle.

Your videos, no matter how many language versions you have made, are even worse than those hanfu bachelor thesis (or even baidukaiku "Chinese Wikipedia") I have found on the internet, at least they put some reference and sources on their paper. Your videos are nothing about a bunch of nonsense which can only attract

You want sources, i have given them to you, but you ignore them , because you are anti-chinese, i know that, and what i gave to you, was a japanese material, but you said, that was not real, maybe i google translated, but the japanese friend here told you that, what i gave to you was real book name. and that slap on your face
 
.
to tell you the truth. ancient Vietnam hated the Qing rulers. We disliked the Manchus. China under the Ming was considered the real China. it is good that you return to the root :cheers:
as for Vietnam, our emperors and officials wore Ming style dress, not from the Manchus.

Hey, that's what I told you earlier. :p:
 
. .
to tell you the truth. ancient Vietnam hated the Qing rulers. We disliked the Manchus. China under the Ming was considered the real China. it is good that you return to the root :cheers:
as for Vietnam, our emperors and officials wore Ming style dress, not from the Manchus.

640px-Minh_Mang.gif


mandarin.jpg
I see the traditional vietnamese characters in that picture, nice.
 
.
.
:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:


There is NO "China". And there are no "Chinese".

"China" is a name given by Westerners in English. Any educated "Chinese" (should be called Huaren) onverseas should choose occasions to deny the existence of a name called "China".

"China, blah blah"

"Excuse me?"

It's Middle Kingdom, or "Zhonghua", or "Huaxia".

It has been the land of mainly Han Chinese since the ancient time.

The Han, also called "Huaren", are the cultural, economical and technological core of the land, always have been.

ALL historically Han -ruled dynasty had been the #1 in the world economically, culturally and technologically, without an exception. And being the #1 by a long shot.


However, there is also "China".

"China" is what the English /Westerners call tableware, strictly speaking it's a derogatory term to Huaxia.

I don't buy Qin'a = China explaination.

"China" refers to the land that has been ruled by all rulers including the Han, the Mongols (Yuan Dynasty) , the Manchus (Qing), and CPC which I don't consider as Han-ruled but aliens in both mthodology and practice.

Historically, ALL non-Han-ruled dynasties, namely Yuan and Qing, even though they were eventually Sinonized, brought untold economical, technological and cultural disasters and miseries to the Middle Kingdom.

One of the major reasons of "century of humiliation" of the Middle Kingdom is Qing:

Middle Kingdom under Qing failed to carry on industrial revolution as Western Europe and even backwater Japan did at a time, despite the fact that "at the eve of England's industrial revolution, China's markets were much more advanced and sophisticated than anything in Western Europe" ( by Adam Smith) ... The Middle Kingdom stagnated on GDP/per cap literally for 2 centuries and dropped from being world's best to being one of the world's poorest as the direct consequence. The following mis-rule of CPC has furthered the humiliation.


Both "China" and Taiwan should change their official names into:

People's Republic of Zhonghua/Huaxia, and

Republic of Zhonghua/Huaxia.
The english word "China" came from chinese Qin, in ancient european language the pronunciation of Qin is Chin
 
. .
.
Oh look, a "皇漢" is trying to show off himself by telling facts. How lovely~ :rofl:

Oh please I don't need you to tell me 1+1=2


"皇漢" is there for a reason, historically correct one.


To deny the overwelmingly economical, cultural and technological achievements across time for the large majority of the written human history in comparison to others is intelletual dishonest at best.

All Chinese, no matter which ethnic you belong to, should feel proud and blessed of "皇漢" being the core part of the nation. The Han are not prefect, but one of the best a ntion could possiblelly have. Imagine that, guess you would have knocked yourself unconscious were others such as Hindu being your core instead. :lol:

Chinas Hanfu Movement----Deutsch version



Hanfu in Köln


I am a HUGE fan of your Hans vids. Please carry it on, mate! :tup:

one advice: dress either in well-made expensive hanfu, or simple-made economical ones with 1 or 2 light colours. Do not ever dress, for both men and particularly women, very colourful hanfu with so many flowers etc, cuz they don't look good.
 
Last edited:
. .
"皇漢" is there for a reason, historically correct one.


To deny the overwelmingly economical, cultural and technological achievements across time for the large majority of the written human history in comparison to others is intelletual dishonest at best.

All Chinese, no matter which ethnic you belong to, should feel proud and blessed of "皇漢" being the core part of the nation. The Han are not prefect, but one of the best a ntion could possiblelly have. Imagine that, guess you would have knocked yourself unconscious were others such as Hindu being your core instead. :lol:




I am a HUGE fan of your vids. Please carry it on, mate! :tup:

Hail "皇漢" :china:
 
. .
Hail "皇漢" :china:
hail 香蕉人,
虽然你否认自己是满族人,但是你的所作所为令人怀疑,至少我们没有宣传仇恨,我们只是宣传自己的文化,你们害怕什么?不论你怎么黑汉服,怎么说皇汉,都无所谓,自从2003年起,就被人冠以皇汉而到处抹黑,但是汉服运动依然越来越多,范围越来越广,而且多数是年轻人,等年轻人掌握国家经济,文化,权力的时候,就是汉服全面复兴的时候,无论你怎么挣扎,这个趋势是不可阻挡的,这就是我为什么一开始就把19世纪奥运会复兴,20世纪希伯来语复兴拿出来一样,他们一开始也是遭到很多人反对,但是依然阻挡不了复兴,你们反对就是我们的动力
 
.
I see the traditional vietnamese characters in that picture, nice.
do you know why we hated the manchus? the arrogant manchus put down Vietnam.

while the Ming considered Vietnam below Korea within the tributes system, the Qing put down Vietnam far behind Korea, in 1840 even had placed the Nguyen envoy below those from Korea, Laos, Siam and Ryukyu. that was a provocation. Can you imagine: Vietnam was ranked lower than Siam and Laos? yes, the Manchus wanted to push Vietnam into a course of confrontation.
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom