Well all I am saying is lot of things with BD remain on "wait and see" mode.
Remember that things done now are important for the scenario unfolding 3 - 5 years later on the ground (given how business lag and cycles work). And the "now" has lot of problems that for political reasons are not being addressed in BD (unlike Vietnam which addressed them 10 - 20 years ago).
We both know about Vinfast right? For something like that, you can show me what VN govt charges as excise duty rate. Then I can quote you what the level is for Indian automotive industry. But when we come to Bangladesh, it will truly shock you as to the level (and why it is kept at that level).....hint: its 3 figures %!
It is all part of a scheme by their politicians to keep labour pool in only one industry (RMG) so its easily controlled and extracted from and bargained with. This self-inflicted lack of diversification is major problem that will only grow in BD (along with commensurate investment into optics propaganda like "women labour participation" and "micro-credit"). Already there is real household income decline for example:
https://opinion.bdnews24.com/2017/12/18/where-did-the-benefits-of-economic-growth-disappear/
You ever seen such in Vietnam during past and current growth phase? Let's be honest here. This is precisely why there is no true "advantage" being gained in BD case when its political party self-ticks (rather than genuinely humbly achieves and keeps going) the traditional industrialisation benefits (for political purposes)....and futher helped by there being less than 100k foreigners (and much much less when you subtract Indians visiting ancestral areas) visiting the country each year to give any real 3rd party fact check (unlike say proper industrialising countries). I mean is it really that good to have more woman in the labour force if real household income (something waaay more important) is declining? Macroeconomic policies and pragmatic results matter!...not cherrypicked numbers taken out of context (esp for cross comparison with other countries)!
You have to remember that Vietnam has one party rule, but that party puts the country first. In BD....the party puts itself first (and puts country near last...and only regarding things that helps the party). That is a very key distinction (and it counters very hard the narrative some BD people here like to shout that mono-party "stability" is good for BD). It for example shows in all I said so far, plus the ease of doing business in Vietnam compared to BD (and the fact BD is stagnating and BD govt not concerned in any pragmatic way to improve it, since it would mean loosening grip of its tentacles on its business people/bribing/propaganda chains):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ease_of_doing_business_index#Ranking
So much butt-hurt can be seen in this post.
@Viet would much rather listen to IMF, ADB, Economist etc than a random poster on PDF on the state and prospects of the BD economy.