What's new

Tony Blair apologizes for Iraq war 'mistakes

its a mistake ... say oops and move on ... after all the butchering of humans following Islam living in the middle east is equivalent to destroying an ant colony... Right Mr. Blair?

I wonder if Hitler when bombed London in WW2 , was also based on faulty intelligence. Could he have said sorry and moved on?

Can you bring back the lives of Abu Gharib jail detainees? Their lives being taken was a small mistake?

Or that 14 year old Iraqi girl who was raped infront of her family and later burned? That was a mistake...

Will you allow such mistakes to be carried out against UK by Russia or some other country?

Mistake my foot you piece of shit
 
Last edited:
. .
View attachment 267021

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Saturday said he was sorry for the "mistakes" committed in the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, but stopped short of apologizing for ousting then-Iraq president Saddam Hussein.

"I can say that I apologize for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong because, even though he had used chemical weapons extensively against his own people, against others, the program in the form that we thought it was did not exist in the way that we thought," the former British prime minister said in an interview with CNN.

Blair was referring to the claim that Saddam's regime possessed weapons of mass destruction, a claim the US and its allies used to justify the Iraq invasion. But the intelligence reports the claim was based on turned out to be false.

Blair, who served as prime minister between 1997 and 2007, has repeatedly denied rushing to war. Under his leadership, Britain made the second biggest troop contribution to the Iraq invasion, and British forces were stationed in the country until 2011.

The US-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein's government and pushed Iraq into chaos, resulting in years of deadly sectarian violence and the rise of al Qaeda in Iraq, a precursor of the extremist group now known as Daesh.

The decision to back the Iraq invasion is now deeply unpopular in Britain and has haunted Blair's Labour Party ever since.

Although Blair said he apologizes "for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime", he stopped short of a full apology for the war or for ousting Saddam and eventually sending him to his death.

"I find it hard to apologize for removing Saddam. I think, even from today in 2015, it is better that he's not there than that he is there," Blair said.

Blair also admitted partial responsibility for eventual the rise of the extremist group Daesh and that the 2003 Iraq invasion was the principle cause behind it.

"Of course, you can't say that those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015," he said.

"But it's important also to realize, one, that the Arab Spring which began in 2011 would also have had its impact on Iraq today, and two, ISIS actually came to prominence from a base in Syria and not in Iraq."

Blair committed UK to Iraq war year before invasion: report

The former British PM's apology comes on the heels of a report that claims he was committed to joining the United States in the Iraq war a year before the 2003 invasion.

The revelations from documents obtained by a UK newspaper focus on a memo allegedly written by former US secretary of state Colin Powell on March 28, 2002 to then president George Bush a week before the US leader's meeting with Blair at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

"On Iraq, Blair will be with us should military operations be necessary," wrote Powell, in a document the Mail on Sunday published on its website.

"He is convinced on two points: the threat is real; and success against Saddam will yield more regional success," Powell said, referring to former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who was eventually ousted in the 2003 US-led invasion.

The newspaper, the Mail on Sunday, said the memo and other sensitive documents were part of a batch of secret emails held on the private server of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton which US courts have forced her to reveal.

A separate quote from Powell assured Bush "the UK will follow our lead in the Middle East", while other statements suggest Blair's willingness to present "strategic, tactical and public affairs lines" to strengthen public support for the Iraq war.

A controversial inquiry by former civil servant John Chilcot into the decisions leading up to the war was expected to take a year to report, but is still not public despite being announced by the government six years ago.

"This story is nothing new. The memo is consistent with what Mr Blair was saying publicly at the time and with Mr Blair´s evidence given to the Chilcot Inquiry" said a spokesperson for Blair's office.
Tony Blair apologizes for Iraq war mistakes - thenews.com.pk
................
And your mistake along with bush caused thousands died/injured/homeless and still Iraq and arounding is unstable bombs blasts sectarians war. And this axxhole said it was a mistake. MF

too late the bloody hero.
 
. . .
sorry 100's of thousands died. Sorry many thousands were crippled, sorry mothers lost their sons, sorry wifes lost their husbands, sorry fathers lost their kids, sorry kids were orphaned. Sorry, sorry, sorry
Oh and sorry daesh is there,
does this moron have a solution with his sorry, oh wait no he dont need to give one, he said sorry. Some one should open his skull with a hammer and then tell him how sorry they are.
 
. . .
Tony Blair apology for Iraq War is the start of a spin operation ahead of Chilcot report, SNP claim | UK Politics | News | The Independent

'What we are seeing is that the tapestry of deceit which was manufactured by Labour is unravelling'

6-Tony-Blair-on-CNN.jpg


Tony Blair’s qualified apology for sending British troops to war in Iraq 12 years ago is the “start of a cynical spin operation” ahead of the publication of the Chilcot report, the SNP has claimed.

The former Prime Minister said that he was sorry that he accepted intelligence reports that the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, still held weapons of mass destruction, which he had once used against his own people. But he was not sorry for bringing Saddam’s brutal regime down.

The former Prime Minister’s qualified apology was made during a sympathetic interview in America, where his political standing is higher than in the UK – and appears to have been timed to remove some of the sting of the forthcoming Chilcot report into the Iraq war.

He told CNN: “I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong because, even though he had used chemical weapons extensively against his own people, the programme did not exist in the way that we thought.”

He added: “I also apologise for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime. But I find it hard to apologise for removing Saddam. I think, even from today in 2015, it is better that he’s not there.”

Asked by his television host Fareed Zakaria, in an interview broadcast on CNN Europe on 25 October, whether the war had contributed to the rise of Isis, Mr Blair replied: “I think there are elements of truth in that. Of course you can’t say those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.”

However, while Mr Blair was admitting mistakes around the invasion, he has never deviated from his view that military action, which cost the lives of 179 British service personnel, was justified. He has implicitly criticised Ed Miliband for opposing military intervention in Syria.

“We have tried intervention and putting down troops in Iraq; we’ve tried intervention without putting in troops in Libya; and we’ve tried no intervention at all but demanding regime change in Syria,” he said. “It’s not clear to me that, even if our policy did not work, subsequent policies have worked better.”

Asked how it felt to be branded a war criminal, he replied: “When I think of my ‘crime’, if you like, which is removing Saddam, and we’ve watched Syria unfold with hundreds of thousands dying … and we have stood back, we in the West bear responsibility for this, Europe most of all. We’ve done nothing.”

He added: “By the way, I always point out to people, I did actually win an election after Iraq, but I agree it’s been a huge political problem.”

There was speculation that the timing of the former Prime Minister’s remarks was linked to the forthcoming Chilcot report into the Iraq war, which is believed to be close to publication, more than six years after Sir John Chilcot opened the inquiry. Publication was delayed so that everyone criticised in the report had a chance to see what was being said about them and to respond. All the responses are now in, though no publication date has been announced.

Angus Robertson, leader of the SNP in the Commons, said: “Tony Blair’s comments are plainly the start of a cynical spin operation ahead of the expected timetable announcement for publication of the Chilcot report. What we are seeing is that the tapestry of deceit which was manufactured by Labour – the pretence of making an illegal war legal – is unravelling. Nobody will be fooled by Tony Blair’s weasel words.”

A spokeswoman for the former PM said: “Tony Blair has always apologised for the intelligence being wrong and for mistakes in planning. He has always also said that he does not, however, think it was wrong to remove Saddam.

“He did not say the decision to remove Saddam in 2003 ‘caused Isis’ and pointed out that Isis was barely heard of at the end of 2008. He went on to say in 2009, Iraq was relatively more stable. What then happened was a combination of two things: there was a sectarian policy pursued by the government of Iraq, which were mistaken policies. But also when the Arab Spring began, Isis moved from Iraq into Syria, built themselves from Syria and then came back into Iraq. All of this he has said before.”

Blair’s apologies: What he said
On whether the decision to topple Saddam Hussein’s regime was a mistake:

“I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong.”

“Even though [Saddam] had used chemical weapons extensively against his own people, against others, the programme in the form that we thought it was did not exist in the way that we thought, so I can apologise for that.”

“I can also apologise… for mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you remove the regime. But I find it hard to apologise for removing Saddam. I think even from today, in 2015, it is better that he’s not there than that he is there.”

On the accusation that the invasion of Iraq was “the principal cause” of the rise of Isis:

“I think there are elements of truth in that.”

“Of course you can’t say that those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015. But it’s important also to realise… that the Arab Spring which began in 2011 would have had its impact on Iraq today, and… Isis actually came to prominence from a base in Syria and not Iraq.”
 
. .
Nearly half million Iraqi dies 2003-2013.
Nearly half a million people have died from war-related causes in Iraq since the US-led invasion in 2003, according to an academic study published in the United States on Tuesday.
That toll is far higher than the nearly 115,000 violent civilian deaths reported by the British-based group Iraq Body Count, which bases its tally on media reports, hospital and morgue records, and official and non-governmental accounts.
The latest estimate by university researchers in the United States, Canada and Baghdad in cooperation with the Iraqi Ministry of Health covers not only violent deaths but other avoidable deaths linked to the invasion, insurgencies and subsequent social breakdown.
It also differs from some previous counts by spanning a longer period of time and by using randomized surveys of households across Iraq to project a nationwide death toll from 2003 to mid 2011.
Iraq Death Toll Reaches 500,000 Since Start Of U.S.-Led Invasion, New Study Says
 
.
Back then

upload_2015-10-27_7-25-46.png


and Now

Blair2.jpg


hmmm let me think

Blai3.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Blair2.jpg
    Blair2.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 13
  • Blair2.jpg
    Blair2.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
.
It is an off handed apology...He didn't really apologize, he just told the world that they can do anything they want under any excuse that our malleable press will sell you.....This is the way we roll..deal with it...For me it is an non event!
 
.
British want to keep an individuality about themselves. So they have to look at their interests peculiar to them alone. Thats why they have to align themselves with the strongest countries. First it was US now its China. If they associate themselves with Europe then they wont have to worry about big powers, they will be a member of a powerful european unity. But they want to maintain a separate identity.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom