Timeline - 1962

[litman]

LOL.

No, I don't think that the experts in the video know far more than any of us.

Let me remind you - you started talking about tactical nuclear devices. The use of tactical nukes on your own soil will not - may not - bring retaliation from India. The use of tactical nukes on Indian soil will definitely bring full-scale retaliation, with regular nuclear bombs, not miniature, tactical bombs. That is the difference. So the effort to seem manly will guarantee massive retaliation.

Think about it.

i think we should end this discussion here as your these two posts suggest you dont have solid arguement and have gone into denial mode. secondly we are off topic so good day.

 

[PeacefulWar]

Entire China favors Mao, but also acknowledged his mistake. Nothing controversial. Deng's economic reform wouldn't be possible without the groundwork laid by Mao. Anyone coming from China would know, I don't even need to explain. You're clearly not from China, but some Southeast Asia countries. That you even need Indian's validation of Mao is just as telling as your feeble knowledge on Askai Chin. Fake.

Glad to know there is another person other than Xi can represent whole China now.
Btw have you decided what for tomorrow's breakfast for whole China yet?

 

[Joe Shearer]

i think we should end this discussion here as your these two posts suggest you dont have solid arguement and have gone into denial mode. secondly we are off topic so good day.

LOL.

The question on 1962 is definitely on topic. However, since you seem to have discovered an urgent, pressing engagement somewhere else, good day.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

It's so damn typical.
For India: it's elites play aggressive and wannabe a great power without knowing the limit of own capabilities, and yet totally not prepared for - mentally and physically - the consequences of it's aggressive behaviors.

For China: Win a war but get nothing! The stupid mentality of "face matters more than actually benefits"

The thing is, the indian psychology, mentality and attitude is VERY different to the rest of humanity. indians by and large DO NOT live in the real world. All they care about is how they are PERCEIVED to be. It doesn't matter if they are supremely poor, malnourished and hopelessly inadequate at everything. The ONLY thing that matters is how loudly the can brag and show off so that YOU and the rest of the world, PERCEIVE them to be powerful and supreme. THAT'S IT. NOTHING MORE. Once you understand this fundamental trait of indians, EVERYTHING else about them makes sense. PERCEPTION DECEPTION.

 

[TNT]

Let me remind you - you started talking about tactical nuclear devices. The use of tactical nukes on your own soil will not - may not - bring retaliation from India. The use of tactical nukes on Indian soil will definitely bring full-scale retaliation, with regular nuclear bombs, not miniature, tactical bombs. That is the difference. So the effort to seem manly will guarantee massive retaliation.

Think about it.

You have a valid point. The discussion ive had with security guys says that tactical nukes are for specific scenarios and it involves using it on Pakistani territory but ofcourse not in populated areas. For example there is a cold start type attack from india on different locations on IB and LOC, in this case Pakistan can use most of its forces in northern n central, populted border area while use tactical nukes to halt massive indian attack on southern, deserted areas. Using a tactical nuke in deserted areas would not cause much damage to us and serve as a warning too and would most probably force international players to intervene. One scenario of tactical nukes is also to be used at sea.
Pakistan also have a massive guerrilla war potential and planners on both sides also take that into account.

 

[PeacefulWar]

The thing is, the indian psychology, mentality and attitude is VERY different to the rest of humanity. indians by and large DO NOT live in the real world. All they care about is how they are PERCEIVED to be. It doesn't matter if they are supremely poor, malnourished and hopelessly inadequate at everything. The ONLY thing that matters is how loudly the can brag and show off so that YOU and the rest of the world, PERCEIVE them to be powerful and supreme. THAT'S IT. NOTHING MORE. Once you understand this fundamental trait of indians, EVERYTHING else about them makes sense. PERCEPTION DECEPTION.

Their politicians need to keep hyping up things to their population to get elected, those who trying to be pragmatic can't win elections. They cornered themselves.

Same seems happens to their medias. Despite to have all the advantages be one of the most influential medias internationally: they use English, have large domestic market to start with, have great Freedom of Speech environment, have plenty of top talent people who are shinning in other international companies. They messed up their international reputations.

 

[nature is]

Glad to know there is another person other than Xi can represent whole China now.
Btw have you decided what for tomorrow's breakfast for whole China yet?

Why are you unable to address my point? A real Chinese from China needs Indian's validation on Mao and Askai Chin? That's as fake as one can get. Side-stepping with sarcasm only re-affirmed it.

 

[PeacefulWar]

Why are you unable to address my point? A real Chinese from China needs Indian's validation on Mao and Askai Chin? That's as fake as one can get. Side-stepping with sarcasm only re-affirmed it.

What BS are you talking?
When did I look for validation from anybody?
I can listen whatever voices I want, it doesn't mean I agree or disagree.

 

[nature is]

What BS are you talking?
When did I look for validation from anybody?
I can listen whatever voices I want, it doesn't mean I agree or disagree.

Not only you took his validation on Mao, you sang to his tune, revealing you had little clue beyond the typical media narrative. Everyone from China knows Mao's achievement in laying the foundation of country which aren't duly recognized outside of China, people are also aware of his mistakes which are grossly exaggerated outside of China. You simply gave yourself away. And you didn't know China kept Askin Chin. Busted!

 

[Joe Shearer]

there is a cold start type attack from india on different locations on IB and LOC, in this case Pakistan can use most of its forces in northern n central, populted border area while use tactical nukes to halt massive indian attack on southern, deserted areas. Using a tactical nuke in deserted areas would not cause much damage to us and serve as a warning too and would most probably force international players to intervene. One scenario of tactical nukes is also to be used at sea.

It really is irritating to have to admit this, but you have summed up things very well.

 

[Joe Shearer]

What BS are you talking?
When did I look for validation from anybody?
I can listen whatever voices I want, it doesn't mean I agree or disagree.

Why are you paying attention to this chartered approval authority for designating valid Chinese points of view?

 

[PeacefulWar]

And you didn't know China kept Askin Chin. Busted!

This is my last response to you. Seems you have serious comprehension issue.
Aksai Chin is under China control but India claims it. Arunachal Pradesh is under India control but China claims part of it.
Hence my words regards give up claims from both side. This is also agreed and proposed by your god: Mao!
Understand?

I heard(circulated in Chinese internet) China still offered proposals like China give up claim in Arunachal Pradesh
and India give up claim of Aksai Chin as late as 2000s to settle border disputes.

Why are you paying attention to this chartered approval authority for designating valid Chinese points of view?

Thank god there is a "ignored list" in this forum!

 

[nature is]

This is my last response to you. Seems you have serious comprehension issue.
Aksai Chin is under China control but India claims it. Arunachal Pradesh is under India control but China claims part of it.
Hence my words regards give up claims from both side. This is also agreed and proposed by your god: Mao!
Understand?

Thank god there is a "ignored list" in this forum!

You said China got nothing from 62 war, China kept Askai Chin. You're busted!

Of course it would be your last reply, you had nothing of substance to refute me. No words on Mao, coz you knew nothing coming from the country you're from.

Yes, seek more validation from Indian who know didn't nothing abt Mao beyond popular media, who couldn't tell whether someone's from China, exactly validate my points.

 

[nautilaceae]

Not only you took his validation on Mao, you sang to his tune, revealing you had little clue beyond the typical media narrative. Everyone from China knows Mao's achievement in laying the foundation of country which aren't duly recognized outside of China, people are also aware of his mistakes which are grossly exaggerated outside of China. You simply gave yourself away. And you didn't know China kept Askin Chin. Busted!

Not getting into your dispute, while I agree he doesn't seem to know China, he could very well be Chinese, a Chinese-Singaporean that is.

 

[nature is]

Not getting into your dispute, while I agree he doesn't seem to know China, he could very well be Chinese, a Chinese-Singaporean that is.

That's exactly what I'm saying, he isn't Chinese from China, but some other Asian countries.