What's new

Time to build dams in Pakistan

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Time to build dams in Pakistan
By Daniel Hyatt
China.org.cn, June 19, 2019

28510da9-1965-4af0-9def-e38528fddbeb.jpg

A file photo of the construction site of Karot Hydropower Plant [Photo/Xinhua]

Pakistan is gearing up to meet its expanding energy requirements in a new world. Revamping the power generation structure, it is moving from expensive imported fuel-based technology to cheaper and greener alternatives.

Apart from solar and wind projects, construction of dams is a priority as the South Asian nation has enormous hydropower potential. The absence of adequate water storage capacity, however, is wasting this massive resource and causing an acute water shortage.

A 2015 IMF report ranks Pakistan third among countries facing such scarcity, with 2025 seen as a crisis point, if not before.

The solution is a national drive for new dams. Spearheaded by a former head of the Supreme Court, the drive is on for mega projects to store water and promote hydropower. However, dams are not easy to build and require extensive amounts of capital and expertise. So, Pakistan, being a developing country, is asking its citizens to donate money to the cause.

A crowdfunding appeal has received a huge response. Wealthy Pakistanis at home and abroad are contributing based on their trust in the current leader with a history of successful fundraising.

Prime Minister Imran Khan has been able to achieve consensus on an issue that was in the past mired in political squabbling. In particular, the dam fund is targeting a geographically feasible proposal in the Himalayas: the Diamer-Basha dam with a planned capacity of 4,500 mW that would be the world's sixth tallest.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has also reached out to its neighbor and closest ally China to help under the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the southern prong of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) covering a range of infrastructure, energy and industrial projects.

Besides the coal-fired power plants built using the latest environmentally friendly technologies, a series of hydropower stations are being promoted within the framework of the CPEC.

Two such ventures already under construction are the Karot station on the Jhelum river and the Suki Kinari station on Kunhar river. The former is of remarkable importance since it is the first investment project of the Silk Road Fund established in Beijing in 2014 to help promote the common prosperity of BRI participating countries. This milestone undertaking is China's first overseas hydropower program using indigenous technology and standards.

BRI is an opportunity that Pakistan intends to fully utilize to overcome its trade and energy deficiencies. In the latest round of discussions with Chinese government officials at the Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) meeting, Pakistan expressed its desire to bring more hydropower generation within the remit of the CPEC.

The JCC, its highest decision-making body, will shortly launch an overall study of Pakistan's power market.

Chinese companies are also constructing dams outside the CPEC. The front runner is the Wuhan based China Gezhouba Group of Companies (CGGC), the main builder of the Three Gorges Dam project. CGGC is now working on a challenging design in the mountains of Kohistan – the Dasu dam harnessing the flow of the Indus River. Financing is coming from China, the World Bank and the government of Pakistan.

Another project launched last month by CGGC in a joint venture with Pakistani and German companies is the US$1.9 billion Mohmand dam on the Swat river. Funded by the Pakistani government, it will be a major source of energy, water storage and flood mitigation. China's other completed contributions to hydropower involve the Neelum-Jhelum power plant and the fourth extension of the Tarbela station.

These efforts aim to address an array of monumental issues. Starting from storage of water, the dams will be providing a year-round irrigation system to utilize the plentiful water flow that originates from the Karakoram mountain range and presently pours largely untapped into the Arabian Sea. This will further contribute to the food security of Pakistan by checking regular devastating floods that damage farmland and livestock.

Adding to the economy, the construction process has already started to create job opportunities for locals and boost associated industries, increasing commercial activity and augmenting government poverty alleviation efforts.

Energy requirements of Pakistan have considerably aided the global expansion of Chinese construction companies. Today, China is the largest builder of hydropower projects around the world, transferring its know-how to developing countries and helping them fulfill their needs. This achievement has advanced not only China's economic growth but also that of its economic partners.

http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2019-06/19/content_74899095.htm
 
.
Time to build dams in Pakistan
By Daniel Hyatt
China.org.cn, June 19, 2019

28510da9-1965-4af0-9def-e38528fddbeb.jpg

A file photo of the construction site of Karot Hydropower Plant [Photo/Xinhua]

Pakistan is gearing up to meet its expanding energy requirements in a new world. Revamping the power generation structure, it is moving from expensive imported fuel-based technology to cheaper and greener alternatives.

Apart from solar and wind projects, construction of dams is a priority as the South Asian nation has enormous hydropower potential. The absence of adequate water storage capacity, however, is wasting this massive resource and causing an acute water shortage.

A 2015 IMF report ranks Pakistan third among countries facing such scarcity, with 2025 seen as a crisis point, if not before.

The solution is a national drive for new dams. Spearheaded by a former head of the Supreme Court, the drive is on for mega projects to store water and promote hydropower. However, dams are not easy to build and require extensive amounts of capital and expertise. So, Pakistan, being a developing country, is asking its citizens to donate money to the cause.

A crowdfunding appeal has received a huge response. Wealthy Pakistanis at home and abroad are contributing based on their trust in the current leader with a history of successful fundraising.

Prime Minister Imran Khan has been able to achieve consensus on an issue that was in the past mired in political squabbling. In particular, the dam fund is targeting a geographically feasible proposal in the Himalayas: the Diamer-Basha dam with a planned capacity of 4,500 mW that would be the world's sixth tallest.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has also reached out to its neighbor and closest ally China to help under the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the southern prong of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) covering a range of infrastructure, energy and industrial projects.

Besides the coal-fired power plants built using the latest environmentally friendly technologies, a series of hydropower stations are being promoted within the framework of the CPEC.

Two such ventures already under construction are the Karot station on the Jhelum river and the Suki Kinari station on Kunhar river. The former is of remarkable importance since it is the first investment project of the Silk Road Fund established in Beijing in 2014 to help promote the common prosperity of BRI participating countries. This milestone undertaking is China's first overseas hydropower program using indigenous technology and standards.

BRI is an opportunity that Pakistan intends to fully utilize to overcome its trade and energy deficiencies. In the latest round of discussions with Chinese government officials at the Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) meeting, Pakistan expressed its desire to bring more hydropower generation within the remit of the CPEC.

The JCC, its highest decision-making body, will shortly launch an overall study of Pakistan's power market.

Chinese companies are also constructing dams outside the CPEC. The front runner is the Wuhan based China Gezhouba Group of Companies (CGGC), the main builder of the Three Gorges Dam project. CGGC is now working on a challenging design in the mountains of Kohistan – the Dasu dam harnessing the flow of the Indus River. Financing is coming from China, the World Bank and the government of Pakistan.

Another project launched last month by CGGC in a joint venture with Pakistani and German companies is the US$1.9 billion Mohmand dam on the Swat river. Funded by the Pakistani government, it will be a major source of energy, water storage and flood mitigation. China's other completed contributions to hydropower involve the Neelum-Jhelum power plant and the fourth extension of the Tarbela station.

These efforts aim to address an array of monumental issues. Starting from storage of water, the dams will be providing a year-round irrigation system to utilize the plentiful water flow that originates from the Karakoram mountain range and presently pours largely untapped into the Arabian Sea. This will further contribute to the food security of Pakistan by checking regular devastating floods that damage farmland and livestock.

Adding to the economy, the construction process has already started to create job opportunities for locals and boost associated industries, increasing commercial activity and augmenting government poverty alleviation efforts.

Energy requirements of Pakistan have considerably aided the global expansion of Chinese construction companies. Today, China is the largest builder of hydropower projects around the world, transferring its know-how to developing countries and helping them fulfill their needs. This achievement has advanced not only China's economic growth but also that of its economic partners.

http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2019-06/19/content_74899095.htm
I do appreciate your highly informed and informative threads.
 
.
Who is going to fund it ?

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...-of-3-4-billion-loan/articleshow/69821105.cms

ADB distances itself from Pakistan's 'premature' claim of $3.4 billion loan

In a huge embarrassment for the Pakistan government, the ADB has distanced itself from the "premature announcement" of Prime Minister Imran Khan's adviser that the global lender would provide a loan of USD 3.4 billion to the cash-strapped nation, saying "discussions are ongoing".

The rare rebuff by the Philippines-headquartered institution came a day after Khan's adviser on finance Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms Khusro Bakhtiar announced that the country would get a loan of USD 3.4 billion for budgetary support, out of which USD 2.1 billion would be released within a year.
 
.
Who is going to fund it ?

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...-of-3-4-billion-loan/articleshow/69821105.cms

ADB distances itself from Pakistan's 'premature' claim of $3.4 billion loan

In a huge embarrassment for the Pakistan government, the ADB has distanced itself from the "premature announcement" of Prime Minister Imran Khan's adviser that the global lender would provide a loan of USD 3.4 billion to the cash-strapped nation, saying "discussions are ongoing".

The rare rebuff by the Philippines-headquartered institution came a day after Khan's adviser on finance Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms Khusro Bakhtiar announced that the country would get a loan of USD 3.4 billion for budgetary support, out of which USD 2.1 billion would be released within a year.
China-led AIIB may pip US-dictated ADB as top infra financier
http://www.millenniumpost.in/business/china-led-aiib-may-pip-us-dictated-adb-as-top-infra-financier-357843
 
.
. .
Only in Economic Times Kalamazoo land would the following statement:

"discussions are ongoing"

constitute a "rebuff".

Its most unusual for the ADB to issue a statement out of the blue, that counters the pakistani govt. claims.

Its embarrassing and it shows the lack of faith the ADB has in the govt.
 
.
Indeed the article you yourself quoted goes on to clearly state in plain English:

"ADB is pleased with the progress of discussions with the government of Pakistan on these issues," the statement added.

Sources here said "the ADB management was embarrassed by the government's premature announcement about the ongoing discussions on loan programme which the bank had not even taken up with its board of directors and had to take an extraordinary step to downplay the discussions".

Therefore all the conjecture comes from you yourself and other Indians "sources", while the bare facts coming from the statements of ADB tell a different story.

Lies and fake news made baby Jesus cry.

Its most unusual for the ADB to issue a statement out of the blue, that counters the pakistani govt. claims.

Its embarrassing and it shows the lack of faith the ADB has in the govt.

Your opinion here is based upon the opinion of Indian unnamed and unspecified "sources". Your opinion is not based on the raw text of ADB's statement. You and Indian "sources" have literally taken an innocent statement "ADB is pleased with the progress of discussions with the government of Pakistan on these issues," or "discussions are ongoing" and decided for yourselves that this counters Pak govt claims.

You could easily get a job at Economic Times, what with your remarkable talent for extracting bs from thin air.
 
.
Indeed the article you yourself quoted goes on to clearly state in plain English:

"ADB is pleased with the progress of discussions with the government of Pakistan on these issues," the statement added.

Sources here said "the ADB management was embarrassed by the government's premature announcement about the ongoing discussions on loan programme which the bank had not even taken up with its board of directors and had to take an extraordinary step to downplay the discussions".

Therefore all the conjecture comes from you yourself and other Indians "sources", while the bare facts coming from the statements of ADB tell a different story.

Lies and fake news made baby Jesus cry.

Your opinion here is based upon the opinion of Indian unnamed and unspecified "sources". Your opinion is not based on the raw text of ADB's statement. You and Indian "sources" have literally taken an innocent statement "ADB is pleased with the progress of discussions with the government of Pakistan on these issues," or "discussions are ongoing" and decided for yourselves that this counters Pak govt claims.

You could easily get a job at Economic Times, what with your remarkable talent for extracting bs from thin air.

What was the need for ADB to issue ANY statements ?

They usually keep quite and let politics play out. But this time they choose NOT to keep quite.

You don't find that unusual or embarrassing ?

You keep claiming its my opinion, but I have only posted a news report, not expressed any opinion.

You are the one with an opinion.
 
.
The news report you quoted stated "sources here said..." which makes what follows AN OPINION. You then based your opinion of it being unusual for ADB to issue a statement "out of the blue that counters Pak govt claims" on that opinion.

Strange that you continue to deny the distinction.
 
.
The news report you quoted stated "sources here said..." which makes what follows AN OPINION. You then based your opinion of it being unusual for ADB to issue a statement "out of the blue that counters Pak govt claims" on that opinion.

Strange that you continue to deny the distinction.

ALL news reports quotes sources and all journalists keep their sources secret.

That makes it NEWS not Opinions.

Do you understand the difference between the two ? They are not the same.
 
.
ALL news reports quotes sources and all journalists keep their sources secret.

That makes it NEWS not Opinions.

Do you understand the difference between the two ? They are not the same.
For real? So I can put my thoughts/interpretations/opinions on a website or a paper, without evidence, and pass it off as true analysis?

Btw your report did state one thing about its sources ... It said "sources here", which at the very least means sources in India (but hey, it could be Sunil or Raj sitting on the next desk over, who fancies himself as a bit of an analyst). The indian sources are vulnerable to the same biases in their opinions that you demonstrate in your own. This is why sources need to be neutral, reputable and free from bias, not just "sources here".
 
.
For real? So I can put my thoughts/interpretations/opinions on a website or a paper, without evidence, and pass it off as true analysis?

Btw your report did state one thing about its sources ... It said "sources here", which at the very least means sources in India (but hey, it could be Sunil or Raj sitting on the next desk over, who fancies himself as a bit of an analyst). The indian sources are vulnerable to the same biases in their opinions that you demonstrate in your own. This is why sources need to be neutral, reputable and free from bias, not just "sources here".

Now I think you are deliberately being obtuse.

There is someone called an Editor who verifies your story.

Or you can post your OPINIONS in the OPINION section of the news paper.

Or if you are the Editor, you could write an Editorial.

Otherwise its NEWS.

BTW "sources here " could also mean the reporter was in Philippines and was referring to her sources there.

I doubt the leaders newspapers of this day and age is seeking your stamp of approval or certification.
 
.
Who is going to fund it ?

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...-of-3-4-billion-loan/articleshow/69821105.cms

ADB distances itself from Pakistan's 'premature' claim of $3.4 billion loan

In a huge embarrassment for the Pakistan government, the ADB has distanced itself from the "premature announcement" of Prime Minister Imran Khan's adviser that the global lender would provide a loan of USD 3.4 billion to the cash-strapped nation, saying "discussions are ongoing".

The rare rebuff by the Philippines-headquartered institution came a day after Khan's adviser on finance Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms Khusro Bakhtiar announced that the country would get a loan of USD 3.4 billion for budgetary support, out of which USD 2.1 billion would be released within a year.

What sources? This is brain fart from analysts

Sources here said "the ADB management was embarrassed by the government's premature announcement about the ongoing discussions on loan programme which the bank had not even taken up with its board of directors and had to take an extraordinary step to downplay the discussions".

Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/69821105.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
 
.
BTW "sources here " could also mean the reporter was in Philippines and was referring to her sources there.
Plausible but no more credible unless I know who the source is and I can verify it myself.

If my doctor prescribes me a pill, I hope he does so on the basis of a credible research paper, with named (unless naming them causes a verifiable risk to them) sources, and free from bias or conflicts of interest, not just on the back of some "sources here".

I doubt the leaders newspapers of this day and age is seeking your stamp of approval or certification.

Depends who reads it. If the reader paying for the article settles for "opinions" without verification and robust referencing, so be it - the editor has no need to do so. But if I pay for a news article, I expect it to be free from bias/conflict of interest and be verifiable. This adds credibility to the article, which adds value, hence people like me will pay for it, hence the editor will take note of my demands otherwise he will lose my custom.

Are we learning economics today as well as correct referencing?

What a day you're having!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom