What's new

Tillerson hints at Air strikes in Pakistan; will the US find...

any attack on Pakistan will exert public pressure on the military to retaliate, which it may not cave into owing to various logical reasons. This would help the US and India to discredit the Army, causing a compelling effect


Anti Aircraft Guns should be placed all over Pakistan.. if this time Pak Army did not defended or retaliated than.. we should do air strikes in indian and indian occupied kashmir...
 
.
There have been, what, about 340 drone attacks inside Pakistan to this date? And yet Pakistani security situation has improved greatly and the economy is on upward stick. It's the US led economic sanctions and a designation of 'terrorist state' which will hurt Pakistan the most.
CPEC will be fine. It's as much for Pak as it is for China.
Finally, it will make Pakistanis unite--I bet a force of 20 million can be raised in a relative short time frame. India and the Afghan rulers will not be spared for their collusion in destroying Pakistan. Gloves will be truly off.

China agreed to invest in CPEC only after drone strikes ended and security situation improved. If drones are back, we are back to square one as Chinese are shrewd financiers would never want to their money go to waste.

Also annoying US would only hurt Pakistan exports as both US and EU are traditional export markets for Pakistan. Also even with Cpec, you cannot out produce China so to export your products there. This results in a larger debt which you cannot sustain.

So it is imperative for a small country like Pakistan to balance out its foreign policy and not put all its eggs in one basket. Hopefully, they will learn.
 
.
.
Did we even know about Abbotabad and Salala attack? there is nothing wrong in getting ready for any misadventure by our enemies. Its time to wake up and make our house in order.
what i meant that Trump admin's policy is same as Obama, nothing extraordinary, we shouldnt worry a bit if we dont have safe heavens. that would be best prevention instead of deploying Air defence.
 
.
There is no doubt..that Trump will conduct air strikes on Pakistan if US has credible information on terrorists on Pak soil
 
.
what i meant that Trump admin's policy is same as Obama, nothing extraordinary, we shouldnt worry a bit if we dont have safe heavens. that would be best prevention instead of deploying Air defence.

Iraq doesnt had WMDs. but they did attack them. if they have any bad plans in coop with india they will put blame on us. So we should b ready for any thing. Doesnt mean we should ask them to attack us. But better b prepared than saying sorry and bending over.
 
.
China agreed to invest in CPEC only after drone strikes ended and security situation improved. If drones are back, we are back to square one as Chinese are shrewd financiers would never want to their money go to waste.

Also annoying US would only hurt Pakistan exports as both US and EU are traditional export markets for Pakistan. Also even with Cpec, you cannot out produce China so to export your products there. This results in a larger debt which you cannot sustain.

So it is imperative for a small country like Pakistan to balance out its foreign policy and not put all its eggs in one basket. Hopefully, they will learn.

Read my post above--Pakistanis will have to eat the proverbial grass if America-led big economic sanctions are enforced. But I insist the Chinese will not back away from CPEC--it is a strategic project for them too.

As for 'balance out', yes, that's the need in Pakistan: Cooler heads unlike the Qaddafis and Husseins. And I think that's what Pakistan has been doing: Calibrated responses to provocations. Good approach.
 
. .
Kabul must burn ... go after airbases and stored ammunition fuel and food dumps...

Retaliate we must.... there is no other option

Once the stored ammunition is gone supply lines will do the rest

That leaves strikes from Arabian sea to counter.... is this even a winnable war for US????
 
.
let me be the devils advocate here.why can't we act against the haqani network why are these guys still sacred and we still classifying terrorist as good or bad even after all we went through in last 12 years .
i am not asking this for the american sake but for our future's sake how long are we going to defend the good terrorists and when are we going to change our mindset.
it doesn't matter who is asking if it is the right thing (which i think it is) why don't we just do it?
and let me play the not so street nigga :D bro they frigging want us to exterminate every pakhtoon out there in Afghanistan as they all look like talibuny to em

Bottom line: Barking dogs seldom bite.
:undecided:
 
.
They already doing it with pure immunity by drones so expect nothing just they close NATO supplies and wait for SORRY word, and that is all.


with drones they are only taking out suspected terrorist, the confirmed ones they know and they keep
 
.
Pakistan should activate all their sources in AF and give bloody nose to occupier .
 
.
Once long ago we were backing Taliban and USA was financially supporting them.
Jalaluddin Haqqani with Ronald Reagan Time Magazine.jpg
 
.
If Taliban has office in Qatar next to US base, who is America fighting in Afghanistan? - Journalist Shahid Qureshi
 
.
Drone strikes in FATA area on TTP is more then welcome or any other hardcore outfits.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom