What's new

Ties with Pakistan not at India’s cost: Vladimir Putin's envoy to Kabul

India is Randi enough for Russia


Pakistan simply is a growing state and interests of Pakistan, China and Russia and even some other states are converging

These are thus being discussed and geo strategic relations being made

We have a upcoming meeting between Russia-China-Pak in the next few weeks to discuss Afghanistan but you can bet your money other things will be discussed also india was completely ignored for this meeting but once again being the insecure whiny trash you are the last I heard you were begging the Russians for a invite

Source of our invite proposal or is it just another momin moment. We don't want to talk with anyone to do things for Afghanistan. We work according to our interests.

Pakistan is not simply a growing state. It is a working ground for other countries to experiment. Your growth never came from the inside. Daddy China is giving toffees and you are just showing off the wrappers.
 
. .
Source of our invite proposal or is it just another momin moment. We don't want to talk with anyone to do things for Afghanistan. We work according to our interests.

Pakistan is not simply a growing state. It is a working ground for other countries to experiment. Your growth never came from the inside. Daddy China is giving toffees and you are just showing off the wrappers.

Our growth comes from the sane place where any other countries growth comes from.

Pakistan for most of its history has been a more successful state then india right through the 50s 60s 70s and 80s we still are better than india on many indicators like Sanitation


We are a nation of 200 million which has enormous potential for growth, WOT, corruption, energy issues were curtailing our growth

But major energy, infrastructure projects are being completed

We are 5% growth at the moment dont be surprised if Pakistan exceeds 7% amd keeps going the potential and prospects are massive

CPEC is just a start
 
.
Our growth comes from the sane place where any other countries growth comes from.

Pakistan for most of its history has been a more successful state then india right through the 50s 60s 70s and 80s we still are better than india on many indicators like Sanitation


We are a nation of 200 million which has enormous potential for growth, WOT, corruption, energy issues were curtailing our growth

But major energy, infrastructure projects are being completed

We are 5% growth at the moment dont be surprised if Pakistan exceeds 7% amd keeps going the potential and prospects are massive

CPEC is just a start

Your growth comes from China. Without China you'd only be dreaming about a project like CPEC.

Unfortunately sanitation won't increase your GDP nor improved your economy. And this is the umpteenth time I'm hearing a Pakistani say "great potential, unlimited resources, bla bla bla".
 
.
dont waste ur time on bhangis, they themselve know they were behind Pakistan 65 out of 70 years on per capita. Problem is that this filthy kind have got first time higher per capita then Pakistan due to instibility and energy crisis hence now they want to showoff and lecture their baap.. 2nd their bharat mata spend 50 years in isolation with her soviet bf and now relaying on western fdi its not a problem, but if Pakistan who were getting investement from west started getting from east is like we have raped bharat mata..
Pretty funny coming from a Pakistani. A country can only run by zero interest loans. & aids...
http://www.economictimes.com/news/i...rs-to-rs-74-trillion/articleshow/53924032.cms
 
.
.
Im not sure indians can tell the difference between reality and diplomatic statements especially those made to sooth the Indian ego and media:lol:

If you look deeper
Russia siding with China at brics and ignoring India's shrill display
The increasing ties with Pakistan
Upcoming conferences on regional issues
Spy chief and military meetings

The writing is on the wall,

When a diplomat is cornered in India, What do you expect him to sayo_O

India had already mastered the art of keeping the Wolf and Lamb in the same cage.

We will maintain same relationship with Russia as we had for the last 70 years while enhancing deep cooperation with their traditional foe's. But you can keep on reading whatever is written on the wall. :)
 
.
Who is this kabulov? Looks like he is on Afghan poppy. Can someone please tell him that Russia has been allowed to access CPEC and history has been made.

This is preposterous. He is trying to break the rectangle. PDF has approved the construction of rectangle from triangle.

What they say, proof is in the pudding?

Truck_on_the_kkh.jpg
 
.
AMRITSAR: Russia is not strengthening ties with Pakistan at India’s cost and it has explained its position to India at the highest level, senior Russian diplomat and President Vladimir Putin’s envoy to Afghanistan
Zamir Kabulov said on Sunday.
“Russia has a different history with Pakistan. We are trying to explore cooperation with Pakistan primarily to counter terror. But Russia’s ties with Pakistan will not be at the cost of our special and privileged strategic partnership with India. This has been explained by our highest leadership to India’s topmost leadership,” Kabulov told ET on the sidelines of the
Heart of Asia meet in Amritsar.
Kabulov was leading the Russian delegation at the Heart of Asia meet, where Russia is one of the 14 stakeholders. He was answering a question on Russia’s emerging ties with Pakistan and recent reports of Pakistan’s “secret talks” with Russia on the use of Gwadar Port and joining China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which were denied by Russia’s foreign ministry. “I myself drafted that rebuff. I am also in charge of South Asia desk in the Russian foreign ministry and I am not aware of it. I do not know from where the suggestion to use either Gwadar or CPEC emerged. There is no such proposal,” Kabulov said.
Kabulov said, “Russia-Pakistan military ties are commercial in nature. With India our military partnership is deep and we offer long credit to India for acquiring military supplies. Therefore the nature of two relationships is different.” Kabulov, an old Afghanistan hand, stressed that Islamic State or Daesh is emerging as the main terrorist group not only in Afghanistan but across regions and suggested that India should remain cautious against this threat.

http://www.economictimes.com/news/d...utins-envoy-to-kabul/articleshow/55799153.cms
who cares..... Russia has to come to us if he wants good relation with Muslim world...... and if he wants to reach in warm water rather through turkey or cepc.... and mind you we did not force Russia that cut off with India and come with us... it is India who wants us be isolated.. we want relations with every1 on equal respect
 
.
AMRITSAR: Russia is not strengthening ties with Pakistan at India’s cost and it has explained its position to India at the highest level, senior Russian diplomat and President Vladimir Putin’s envoy to Afghanistan
Zamir Kabulov said on Sunday.
“Russia has a different history with Pakistan. We are trying to explore cooperation with Pakistan primarily to counter terror. But Russia’s ties with Pakistan will not be at the cost of our special and privileged strategic partnership with India. This has been explained by our highest leadership to India’s topmost leadership,” Kabulov told ET on the sidelines of the
Heart of Asia meet in Amritsar.
Kabulov was leading the Russian delegation at the Heart of Asia meet, where Russia is one of the 14 stakeholders. He was answering a question on Russia’s emerging ties with Pakistan and recent reports of Pakistan’s “secret talks” with Russia on the use of Gwadar Port and joining China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which were denied by Russia’s foreign ministry. “I myself drafted that rebuff. I am also in charge of South Asia desk in the Russian foreign ministry and I am not aware of it. I do not know from where the suggestion to use either Gwadar or CPEC emerged. There is no such proposal,” Kabulov said.
Kabulov said, “Russia-Pakistan military ties are commercial in nature. With India our military partnership is deep and we offer long credit to India for acquiring military supplies. Therefore the nature of two relationships is different.” Kabulov, an old Afghanistan hand, stressed that Islamic State or Daesh is emerging as the main terrorist group not only in Afghanistan but across regions and suggested that India should remain cautious against this threat.

http://www.economictimes.com/news/d...utins-envoy-to-kabul/articleshow/55799153.cms

Happy now? I hope your insecurity and inferiority complex has been addressed now.
 
.
India must come out of Indo-Russia friendship hang over. Every country has the right to look for its national interest first. If Russia is doing changes in their foreign policy towards India, Its their right to do so. We should also calibrate our ties with Russia accordingly!!!!!

russia not changing its foreign policy toward india....like india trade with US , why their is so much noise if russia like to trade with pakistan...
 
.
AMRITSAR: Russia is not strengthening ties with Pakistan at India’s cost and it has explained its position to India at the highest level, senior Russian diplomat and President Vladimir Putin’s envoy to Afghanistan
Zamir Kabulov said on Sunday.
“Russia has a different history with Pakistan. We are trying to explore cooperation with Pakistan primarily to counter terror. But Russia’s ties with Pakistan will not be at the cost of our special and privileged strategic partnership with India. This has been explained by our highest leadership to India’s topmost leadership,” Kabulov told ET on the sidelines of the
Heart of Asia meet in Amritsar.
Kabulov was leading the Russian delegation at the Heart of Asia meet, where Russia is one of the 14 stakeholders. He was answering a question on Russia’s emerging ties with Pakistan and recent reports of Pakistan’s “secret talks” with Russia on the use of Gwadar Port and joining China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which were denied by Russia’s foreign ministry. “I myself drafted that rebuff. I am also in charge of South Asia desk in the Russian foreign ministry and I am not aware of it. I do not know from where the suggestion to use either Gwadar or CPEC emerged. There is no such proposal,” Kabulov said.
Kabulov said, “Russia-Pakistan military ties are commercial in nature. With India our military partnership is deep and we offer long credit to India for acquiring military supplies. Therefore the nature of two relationships is different.” Kabulov, an old Afghanistan hand, stressed that Islamic State or Daesh is emerging as the main terrorist group not only in Afghanistan but across regions and suggested that India should remain cautious against this threat.

http://www.economictimes.com/news/d...utins-envoy-to-kabul/articleshow/55799153.cms

if you have to ask that question!!
 
.
But-but, Russia suoported Pakistan in heart of Asia confrence...
How can do this...
LOL.
russia is still a powerfull army who hasa saying in internatinal matters.....
russia do not support pakistan at the cofrence but just commented that india pakistsn should resolve issues biletrally and not to use a international forum for this.....isnt that the indian stand till now , when pakistan used to do in past in every international forum...only difference now is that modi govt is going retaliatery mode.....
 
.
Why?

Let's not put all our eggs in one basket, I think we are playing the card well! We need Russia as much as Russia needs us! The fact of the matter is that we need to ensure that we maintain neutrality with all stakeholders. The relationship is a tried and tested one.

Russia is looking after its own economic interests, having said that, I believe there is little to fear from them! The Russians know our position quite well. There is no benefit is leaning towards one from another!

The disadvantages of upsetting our relationship is far worse off for Russia than it is for India!
really?LOL, your entire fleet of air force is Russian and you think you have the upper hand
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom