Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jiang zemin was actually very pro west, and he was a weak leader when it comes to foreign policies.Xi leadership need to outlive Jiang zemin. He still remain a very influential figure despite being in the background.
I think you are pretty much speaking from mainstream white american point of view, they love to see Xi go to be replaced by a chinese lapdog to US, but, they are only dreaming by making up all those faults of Xi.He does need to go. His second term is a disappointment.
- Started focusing on building cult of personality
- Increased censorship and surveillance
- Crashing the economy with his continued Zero COVID policy
Guy is like China's version of Brezhnev.
After all what's happening in Ukraine you seriously want someone like Putin ?China needs a leader like Putin, Xi is too soft.
We don't need a leader like Putin.After all what's happening in Ukraine you seriously want someone like Putin ?
Don't you think that you are what you described in your post?We don't need a leader like Putin.
Putin is like a little girl who sells nuclear bombs. If we don't buy her nuclear bombs, she will light them and send us all to see her grandmother.
For a country like China, the threat of frequent use of nuclear bombs like Putin is the real fear. And always stick to your own path and attitude, not being tough, and not yielding, which is called self-confidence.Don't you think that you are what you described in your post?
I can smell fear of west and greed for more western money in your very post.
Not that much of self confidence my friend.For a country like China, the threat of frequent use of nuclear bombs like Putin is the real fear. And always stick to your own path and attitude, not being tough, and not yielding, which is called self-confidence.
WowHowever, if Wang Yang takes over, it may not be a good thing for Pakistan. He has deep personal relations with modi.
On the contrary, it shows that we are full of confidence in the future.Not that much of self confidence my friend.
I have always seen China as a friendly country but your reaction to what Pelosi did was not what i expected. She came, she threatened, she did everything to undermine China and she left. After her leaving even bombing Taiwan to ashes won't make slightest difference but only makes a hero of USA and American puppets in Taiwan. Westerners be like, oh the hero Americans tried to save innocent puppets in Taiwan from evil China.
Completely disappointing
Well i hope so. An strong China means stronger Asia.On the contrary, it shows that we are full of confidence in the future.
Indeed. They are scared of China's economic capability, and PLA's strong position strikes fear in their hearts. They will do whatever they can to avoid losing that position. History has taught us, when you choose peace with them like the case with JCPOA, they come closer to inflict their desired damage, when you talk to them with strong punches, they retreat and look for puppets and allies for help.As a world leader, the USA should have the responsibility to avoid World War. And its current behavior just shows its anxiety about the future.
They did what they wanted and planned for.Moreover, after this incident, we obtained the right to freely enter Taiwan's airspace and territorial sea. And what practical benefits have the USA and Taiwan gained?
What do you want china to do regarding pelosis visit ? Seriously, stop her plane on the way to taiwan ? She is in international airspace, try to intercept her government plane and force it go away from taiwan, then its a serious provocation to us and violation of international laws on china part and the action could end in serious collision and tragedy for the planes involved. In that case, china will have to be prepared to go to war with us. When her plane was in taiwanese airspace, thereotically, chinese airforce could intercept and chase her plane out and away since the airspace is chinese as china claims, but, then taiwanese air force has the full control of taiwanese airspace, unless china first go to war with taiwan and take over control of taiwanese airspace , then, this action of chasing her plane away is possible, but, its unrealistic for the time being.Not that much of self confidence my friend.
I have always seen China as a friendly country but your reaction to what Pelosi did was not what i expected. She came, she threatened, she did everything to undermine China and she left. After her leaving even bombing Taiwan to ashes won't make slightest difference but only makes a hero of USA and American puppets in Taiwan. Westerners be like, oh the hero Americans tried to save innocent puppets in Taiwan from evil China.
Completely disappointing
Chinese gov and military just said that china will not stand by idle on her visit, said china will take actions. All the hypes of intercepting her and shooting down the plane are from netizens and journalists.Well i hope so. An strong China means stronger Asia.
But if you ask for my personal opinion, the threats before her visits and the show of exteinsive sensitivity from your side says otherwise.
Indeed. They are scared of China's economic capability, and PLA's strong position strikes fear in their hearts. They will do whatever they can to avoid losing that position. History has taught us, when you choose peace with them like the case with JCPOA, they come closer to inflict their desired damage, when you talk to them with strong punches, they retreat and look for puppets and allies for help.
They did what they wanted and planned for.
You shouldn't have allowed her land in Taiwan as per previous threats before her visit. Or else you should have looked the other way from the beginning. Thats what im trying to say.
Unfortunately. If I'm not mistaken. The Xi won the third term. Wang Yang will become the new premier.Wow
Elect that guy Hu chunhua then
Two term limit should have been respected, it was something that worked for China since late 1980sHe should leave, for whatever reason the two term limit shouldn't be broken, it's not a good example for future leaders.
Putin was a massive failureYou cannot have "good military" without a vibrant economy and creative environment for innovation. Look at what Juche ideology has done to North Korea, because that's where Xi is headed. Soviet Union had a powerful military, and how did that go? Funny enough, majority of the advancement in military technology were started by Hu and Jiang.
Xi is ruining the foundation of a stable political structure, suppressing thoughts and mismanaging the economy with his zero COVID policy. Being in power for 10 years is more than enough for any leader.
A corrupt oligarch that assassinate his political opponents and failed to diversify Russia's economy even though he was in power for over 20 years? Spent 70 billion a year on military and yet could not take 1/3 of Ukraine?
Sure thing, send China on a downward spiral. The Putin worship here is just silly.