What's new

The Terrible Cost of Presidential Racism

DalalErMaNodi

BANNED
Joined
May 12, 2020
Messages
5,290
Reaction score
6
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Kuwait
Recently declassified White House tapes reveal how President Nixon’s racism and misogyny led him to ignore the genocidal violence of the Pakistani military in what is today Bangladesh.

1599307963980.png

President Richard Nixon and his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, in 1972.

As Americans grapple with problems of racism and power, a newly declassified trove of White House tapes provides startling evidence of the bigotry voiced by President Richard M. Nixon and Henry Kissinger, his national security adviser.

The full content of these tapes reveal how U.S. policy toward South Asia under Mr. Nixon was influenced by his hatred of, and sexual repulsion toward, Indians.

These new tapes are about one of the grimmest episodes of the Cold War, which brought ruin to Bangladesh in 1971. At that time, India tilted heavily toward the Soviet Union while a military dictatorship in Pakistan backed the United States. Pakistan flanked India on two sides: West Pakistan and the more populous, and mostly Bengali, East Pakistan.

In March 1971, after Bengali nationalists won a democratic election in Pakistan, the junta began a devastating crackdown on its own Bengali citizens.

Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger staunchly supported the military regime in Pakistan as it killed hundreds of thousands of Bengalis, with 10 million refugees fleeing into neighboring India. New Delhi secretly trained and armed Bengali guerrillas.

The crisis culminated in December 1971 when India defeated Pakistan in a short war that resulted in the creation of an independent Bangladesh.

I documented the violent birth of Bangladesh and the disgraceful White House diplomacy around it in my book “The Blood Telegram,” published in 2013.

Much of my evidence came from scores of White House tapes, which reveal Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger as they really operated behind closed doors. Yet many tapes still had long bleeps.

In December 2012, I filed a legal request for a mandatory declassification review with the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum.

After considerable wrangling, the Nixon archivists at last released a few unbleeped tapes in May 2018 and July 2019, then 28 more in batches from October 2019 to this past May. (There are bleeps still remaining on a couple of the reviewed tapes, some of which I am appealing.)

It was stunning to hear a conversation between Mr. Nixon, Mr. Kissinger and H.R. Haldeman, the White House chief of staff, in the Oval Office in June 1971.

“Undoubtedly the most unattractive women in the world are the Indian women,” said Mr. Nixon. “Undoubtedly,” he repeated, with a venomous tone.

He continued, “The most sexless, nothing, these people. I mean, people say, what about the Black Africans? Well, you can see something, the vitality there, I mean they have a little animallike charm, but God, those Indians, ack, pathetic. Uch.”

On Nov. 4, 1971, during a private break from a contentious White House summit with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India — a rare woman leader at the time — the president harangued Mr. Kissinger about his sexual disgust at Indians.

1599308155863.png

Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and President Nixon at the White House in 1971.

Mr. Nixon said: “To me, they turn me off. How the hell do they turn other people on, Henry? Tell me.” Mr. Kissinger’s response is inaudible, but it did not discourage the president from his theme.

The president, in between bitter sparring matches with Mrs. Gandhi about the danger of war with Pakistan, suggested to Mr. Kissinger that his own sexual neuroses were having an impact on foreign policy: “They turn me off. They are repulsive and it’s just easy to be tough with them.”

A few days later, on Nov. 12, 1971, in the middle of a discussion about India-Pakistan tensions with Mr. Kissinger and Secretary of State William P. Rogers, after Mr. Rogers mentioned reprimanding Mrs. Gandhi, the president blurted, “I don’t know how they reproduce!

Mr. Kissinger has portrayed himself as above the racism of the Nixon White House, but the tapes show him joining in the bigotry, though the tapes cannot determine whether he truly shared the president’s prejudices or was just pandering to him.

On June 3, 1971, Mr. Kissinger was indignant at the Indians, while the country was sheltering millions of traumatized Bengali refugees who had fled the Pakistan army.

He blamed the Indians for causing the refugee flow, apparently by their covert sponsorship of the Bengali insurgency.

He then condemned Indians as a whole, his voice oozing with contempt, “They are a scavenging people.”

On June 17, 1971 — in the same conversation as Mr. Nixon’s outburst at “sexless” Indian women — the president was furious at Kenneth B. Keating, his ambassador to India, who two days earlier had confronted Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger in the Oval Office, calling Pakistan’s crackdown “almost entirely a matter of genocide.”

Mr. Nixon now asked what “do the Indians have that takes even a Keating, for Christ, a 70-year-old” — here there is cross-talk, but the word seems to be “bachelor” or “bastard.” In reply, Mr. Kissinger sweepingly explained: “They are superb flatterers, Mr. President.

They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That’s how they survived 600 years. They suck up — their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.”

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”

These emotional displays of prejudice help to explain a foreign policy debacle. Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger’s policies toward South Asia in 1971 were not just a moral disaster but a strategic fiasco on their own Cold War terms.

While Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger had some reasons to favor Pakistan, an American ally which was secretly helping to bring about their historic opening to China, their biases and emotions contributed to their excessive support for Pakistan’s murderous dictatorship throughout its atrocities.

As Mr. Kissinger’s own staff members had warned him, this one-sided approach handed India the opportunity to rip Pakistan in half, first by sponsoring the Bengali guerrillas and then with the war in December 1971 — resulting in a Cold War victory for the Soviet camp.

For decades, Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger have portrayed themselves as brilliant practitioners of realpolitik, running a foreign policy that dispassionately served the interests of the United States.

But these declassified White House tapes confirm a starkly different picture: racism and misogyny at the highest levels, covered up for decades under ludicrous claims of national security. A fair historical assessment of Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger must include the full truth, unbleeped.



Source
 
. .
I doubt Kissinger had such prejudice, his was too smart to have such views.
 
.
Awami league bluetooth boyz always live 50 years behind, how they can think of or make any progress? That is exactly waht happening today in the "Bangladesh" that was created.
TODAY, Awami league cheer leaders trying to hide the facts
  • Awami league regime and its cadre killing of son know freedom fighter and ex army officer.
  • Awami league youth wing terrorists fatally attacked and injured, daughter of another freedom fighter daughter and local govt official.
  • Another 75 years old freedom fighter when cried for treatment of his wife was beaten along with family.
  • .......list goes on.
Nixon was from a different country, not really a matter, not a bit in the year 2020. Any rational person should ask the question why anyone should give a hoot to 50 years old saga when current regime is acting against Bangladesh sovereignty and people who fought to achieve it???
 
.
It is very revealing that Nixon administration was very aware of Indian nature to suck up and flatter, subtly and overtly, as needed. This coupled with natural talent of story telling, outright distortions and lies, mimicry are perhaps their strongest suit. A true indian superhero would have a prized tongue and his/her kryptonite, a duct tape.
It should be equally humiliating(subjective) that the world actually knows or is averse to this Indian talent...
 
Last edited:
.
While I realize - most of the views Nixon held about Indians and Pakistanis are generalized and filled with ignorant personal bias, the point is, one cannot take them seriously.

At the time, a woman leader of any capability (much less Indian) was a rarity, and I have to say judging by Indira Gandhi's education and background, she was a far more capable leader than Nixon. This is my view, and that does not mean I agreed with what she did in Amritsar or even concerning Bangladesh.

Nixon was just spewing unneeded venom because he thought Indira Gandhi would be an easy person to walk over and bully (being a woman).

Incidentally - his views about Pakistanis, wasn't too flattering either. But as we all know, Karma is a b1tch...
 
.
While I realize - most of the views Nixon held about Indians and Pakistanis are generalized and filled with ignorant personal bias, the point is, one cannot take them seriously.

At the time, a woman leader of any capability (much less Indian) was a rarity, and I have to say judging by Indira Gandhi's education and background, she was a far more capable leader than Nixon. This is my view, and that does not mean I agreed with what she did in Amritsar or even concerning Bangladesh.

Nixon was just spewing unneeded venom because he thought Indira Gandhi would be an easy person to walk over and bully (being a woman).

Incidentally - his views about Pakistanis, wasn't too flattering either. But as we all know, Karma is a b1tch...







Is there any credible evidence of him having made racist comments about Pakistanis? If so please post the links here.
 
.
Is there any credible evidence of him having made racist comments about Pakistanis? If so please post the links here.

Well I don't recall where, but Kissinger sure did right here. See the first post. It's common knowledge that both Nixon and Kissinger saw both Pakistan and India as pawns.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It's logical not to expect any less....Nixon was not a friend of either country. He used Pakistani folks to build relationships and detente with China during the cold war.

I don't consider supplying surplus obsolete fighters like F86's and M24/M3 tanks to Pakistan as too friendly a gesture, which were heavily underwhelming against what India wielded at the time. But what do I know?

Look at the following, you may find something of interest,

https://www.brownpundits.com/2014/07/31/eye-in-sky-us-pakistan-u2-and-so-on/

Look in the timeline about 51:30 in the tape here,

 
Last edited:
.
Well I don't recall where, but Kissinger sure did right here. See the first post. It's common knowledge that both Nixon and Kissinger saw both Pakistan and India as pawns.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It's logical not to expect any less....Nixon was not a friend of either country. He used Pakistani folks to build relationships with China past the cold war.

I don't consider supplying surplus obsolete fighters like F86's and M24/M3 tanks to Pakistan as too friendly a gesture, which were heavily underwhelming against what India wielded at the time. But what do I know?

Look at the following, you may find something of interest,

https://www.brownpundits.com/2014/07/31/eye-in-sky-us-pakistan-u2-and-so-on/









Didn't say anything about Pakistanis being the ugliest race on the planet like he said about indian people.


PS In all honesty, unlike indians and other non-whites, I and nearly all other Pakistanis could not care less what white people and other foreigners think or say about me or my people...........:lol:..........it doesn't bother or phase us in the slightest..........:lol:.............we don't seek the approval or validation of the white race like nearly all other non-whites do..........:azn:
 
.
Mr. Nixon now asked what “do the Indians have that takes even a Keating, for Christ, a 70-year-old” — here there is cross-talk, but the word seems to be “bachelor” or “bastard.” In reply, Mr. Kissinger sweepingly explained: “They are superb flatterers, Mr. President.

They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That’s how they survived 600 years. They suck up — their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.” Will
Now that is an undeniable truth. :lol:

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”
also true
I doubt Kissinger had such prejudice, his was too smart to have such views.
bottomless basket
Didn't say anything about Pakistanis being the ugliest race on the planet like he said about indian people.


PS In all honesty, unlike indians and other non-whites, I and nearly all other Pakistanis could not care less what white people and other foreigners think or say about me or my people...........:lol:..........it doesn't bother or phase us in the slightest..........:lol:.............we don't seek the approval or validation of the white race like nearly all other non-whites do..........:azn:
half of Pakistanis migrated from India and were Indians until 1947... by effect still associated with them... no matter how much pseudoethnic identity one might try to pose
 
.
Didn't say anything about Pakistanis being the ugliest race on the planet like he said about indian people.


PS In all honesty, unlike indians and other non-whites, I and nearly all other Pakistanis could not care less what white people and other foreigners think or say about me or my people...........:lol:..........it doesn't bother or phase us in the slightest..........:lol:.............we don't seek the approval or validation of the white race like nearly all other non-whites do..........:azn:

LOL.

You can't be serious.
 
.
LOL.

You can't be serious.

I find some younger folks in PDF to be a bit immature.

All Indians aren't ugly, and all Pakistanis aren't models.

Same goes for Bangladeshis.

I am amazed that we are even discussing such things....this is 2020, the age of the Internet.

Whether you like or dislike someone's looks is your own personal opinion, and no more.
 
.
Now that is an undeniable truth. :lol:


also true

bottomless basket

half of Pakistanis migrated from India and were Indians until 1947... by effect still associated with them... no matter how much pseudoethnic identity one might try to pose





That half were Punjabis from a specific group who now make less than 2% of india's population. In contrast, 45% of Pakistanis are racially and genetically related to over 75% of Afghans and 30% of Iranians. Pakistanis are not indians just as we are not Afghans or Iranians. Pakistanis are racially and genetically different to at least 98% of indians.


Here is the genetic map of Pakistanis compared to indians:

 
.
What does it matter, me a brown skinned Bangladeshi was made to feel more at home in Germany by my German friends than the slightly fair skinned Pakistanis.


Was invited to many a parties whilst the fair skinned Pakistanis were not, they're mistaken for Arabs which has certain repercussions in Europe.

Not that their own reputation is great, whether that is justified or not is another issue, which I don't need to comment on.

While they would face racism day in and day out, there wasn't a single instance where I felt hard done by because of my skin colour.


Our reputation and the reputation of Bangladesh in Europe is quite good (excluding the UK, there we have a special kind of reputation), many people do not know much about Bangladesh and those who do have positive views about us.

We are seen as industrious and dedicated to our work, indeed you can notice this spirit in the grassroots level of our society, the rickshaw pullers, making sacrifices everyday for a better tomorrow, same for our expatriate brothers in middle East (the labourers) and same for the ones in Europe, who come as farmhands and then go from rags to riches through decades of hard work, you think people don't notice but they do; it shapes perceptions.

So in that context, I'd rather be a brown Bengali than a supermodel Pakistani with 3 shades of lighter skin.



But then again, this is just my experience, and speaking of seeking validation and acknowledgement from whites, that is more prevalent in Pakistan and India than in Bangladesh, hell whites barely visit Bangladesh.


A white woman got involved in reporting about Pakistani politics (forgot her name but she made a lot of rape accusations against Pak politicians and what not - Cynthia Richie) and PDF went Gaga for her, so that goes to shows who is actually seeking validation.

Trying to be Turkish and Arab doesn't exactly scream : I'm at peace with myself either.

The point I'm trying to illustrate is: it doesn't make a difference what skin colour you are, your actions define you and your people and others perception of your people, it's quite naive to think you'd get brownie points for being a few shades lighter whilst living among actual Caucasians who'd call you brown all the same.


But I believe this Particular pakistani user, I have observed his posts and it checks out, he probably doesn't really care what people think but I won't say the same for the majority of Pakistanis abroad.
this is wrong , I have been in Germany for some time now , Germans are nice people and dont discrimiate on personal level , if they know you and be friend with you , they will treat you equally speically if someone is educated as well and try to assimilate into their culture. Germans mistake Pakistanis as latinos lots of time, since Pakistanis have big presence in German univerisites like latinos , while arabs are barely present in academia. Also Pakistanis come in various shades , there is not one Pakistani color.
 
.
this is wrong , I have been in Germany for some time now , Germans are nice people and dont discrimiate on personal level , if they know you and be friend with you , they will treat you equally speically if someone is educated as well and try to assimilate into their culture. Germans mistake Pakistanis as latinos lots of time, since Pakistanis have big presence in German univerisites like latinos , while arabs are barely present in academia. Also Pakistanis come in various shades , there is not one Pakistani color.


Could be, but what I'm trying to say is skin colour doesn't matter but some of your countrymen think otherwise.


And every Pakistani I've known here has told me they get mistaken for North Africans and Arabs all the time and that people are racist to them, I've even seen this with my own eyes. Never heard of them being mistaken for latinos but I could see that happening.


Islamophobes target Pakistanis all the time, it also depends where in Germany you reside, some cities are more liberal than others, some not so.


As for Pakistanis coming in all shades and colours, I agree, never said otherwise, it is your countrymen who try to pander the line that Pakistanis are white and are more Arab and Persian than they're South Asian.


They uphold the fair skinned Pakistanis, whilst relegating the millions of darker ones to the back seat, if that doesn't say inferiority complex, I don't know what does.


You can see some Pakistanis on here regularly berate others for being darker, some are even unabashedly praising Nixon's remarks, whilst others try to portray themselves as rare district white race just propped up in the middle brown people by some miracle.

It doesn't work that way, you're innately related to your neighbours and South Asia was one region and millions of people from former Raj live in the pakistan of today, so attempting to say that Pakistanis are racially different from Indians is laughable.
 
Last edited:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom