What's new

The Terrible Cost of Presidential Racism

Recently declassified White House tapes reveal how President Nixon’s racism and misogyny led him to ignore the genocidal violence of the Pakistani military in what is today Bangladesh.

View attachment 666884
President Richard Nixon and his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, in 1972.

As Americans grapple with problems of racism and power, a newly declassified trove of White House tapes provides startling evidence of the bigotry voiced by President Richard M. Nixon and Henry Kissinger, his national security adviser.

The full content of these tapes reveal how U.S. policy toward South Asia under Mr. Nixon was influenced by his hatred of, and sexual repulsion toward, Indians.

These new tapes are about one of the grimmest episodes of the Cold War, which brought ruin to Bangladesh in 1971. At that time, India tilted heavily toward the Soviet Union while a military dictatorship in Pakistan backed the United States. Pakistan flanked India on two sides: West Pakistan and the more populous, and mostly Bengali, East Pakistan.

In March 1971, after Bengali nationalists won a democratic election in Pakistan, the junta began a devastating crackdown on its own Bengali citizens.

Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger staunchly supported the military regime in Pakistan as it killed hundreds of thousands of Bengalis, with 10 million refugees fleeing into neighboring India. New Delhi secretly trained and armed Bengali guerrillas.

The crisis culminated in December 1971 when India defeated Pakistan in a short war that resulted in the creation of an independent Bangladesh.

I documented the violent birth of Bangladesh and the disgraceful White House diplomacy around it in my book “The Blood Telegram,” published in 2013.

Much of my evidence came from scores of White House tapes, which reveal Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger as they really operated behind closed doors. Yet many tapes still had long bleeps.

In December 2012, I filed a legal request for a mandatory declassification review with the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum.

After considerable wrangling, the Nixon archivists at last released a few unbleeped tapes in May 2018 and July 2019, then 28 more in batches from October 2019 to this past May. (There are bleeps still remaining on a couple of the reviewed tapes, some of which I am appealing.)

It was stunning to hear a conversation between Mr. Nixon, Mr. Kissinger and H.R. Haldeman, the White House chief of staff, in the Oval Office in June 1971.

“Undoubtedly the most unattractive women in the world are the Indian women,” said Mr. Nixon. “Undoubtedly,” he repeated, with a venomous tone.

He continued, “The most sexless, nothing, these people. I mean, people say, what about the Black Africans? Well, you can see something, the vitality there, I mean they have a little animallike charm, but God, those Indians, ack, pathetic. Uch.”

On Nov. 4, 1971, during a private break from a contentious White House summit with Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India — a rare woman leader at the time — the president harangued Mr. Kissinger about his sexual disgust at Indians.

View attachment 666886
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and President Nixon at the White House in 1971.

Mr. Nixon said: “To me, they turn me off. How the hell do they turn other people on, Henry? Tell me.” Mr. Kissinger’s response is inaudible, but it did not discourage the president from his theme.

The president, in between bitter sparring matches with Mrs. Gandhi about the danger of war with Pakistan, suggested to Mr. Kissinger that his own sexual neuroses were having an impact on foreign policy: “They turn me off. They are repulsive and it’s just easy to be tough with them.”

A few days later, on Nov. 12, 1971, in the middle of a discussion about India-Pakistan tensions with Mr. Kissinger and Secretary of State William P. Rogers, after Mr. Rogers mentioned reprimanding Mrs. Gandhi, the president blurted, “I don’t know how they reproduce!

Mr. Kissinger has portrayed himself as above the racism of the Nixon White House, but the tapes show him joining in the bigotry, though the tapes cannot determine whether he truly shared the president’s prejudices or was just pandering to him.

On June 3, 1971, Mr. Kissinger was indignant at the Indians, while the country was sheltering millions of traumatized Bengali refugees who had fled the Pakistan army.

He blamed the Indians for causing the refugee flow, apparently by their covert sponsorship of the Bengali insurgency.

He then condemned Indians as a whole, his voice oozing with contempt, “They are a scavenging people.”

On June 17, 1971 — in the same conversation as Mr. Nixon’s outburst at “sexless” Indian women — the president was furious at Kenneth B. Keating, his ambassador to India, who two days earlier had confronted Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger in the Oval Office, calling Pakistan’s crackdown “almost entirely a matter of genocide.”

Mr. Nixon now asked what “do the Indians have that takes even a Keating, for Christ, a 70-year-old” — here there is cross-talk, but the word seems to be “bachelor” or “bastard.” In reply, Mr. Kissinger sweepingly explained: “They are superb flatterers, Mr. President.

They are masters at flattery. They are masters at subtle flattery. That’s how they survived 600 years. They suck up — their great skill is to suck up to people in key positions.”

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”

These emotional displays of prejudice help to explain a foreign policy debacle. Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger’s policies toward South Asia in 1971 were not just a moral disaster but a strategic fiasco on their own Cold War terms.

While Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger had some reasons to favor Pakistan, an American ally which was secretly helping to bring about their historic opening to China, their biases and emotions contributed to their excessive support for Pakistan’s murderous dictatorship throughout its atrocities.

As Mr. Kissinger’s own staff members had warned him, this one-sided approach handed India the opportunity to rip Pakistan in half, first by sponsoring the Bengali guerrillas and then with the war in December 1971 — resulting in a Cold War victory for the Soviet camp.

For decades, Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger have portrayed themselves as brilliant practitioners of realpolitik, running a foreign policy that dispassionately served the interests of the United States.

But these declassified White House tapes confirm a starkly different picture: racism and misogyny at the highest levels, covered up for decades under ludicrous claims of national security. A fair historical assessment of Mr. Nixon and Mr. Kissinger must include the full truth, unbleeped.



Source
America is muted on genocide in Indian occupied Kashmir have you any answer pseudo intellectual
 
. .
Could be, but what I'm trying to say is skin colour doesn't matter but some of your countrymen think otherwise.


And every Pakistani I've known here has told me they get mistaken for North Africans and Arabs all the time and that people are racist to them, I've even seen this with my own eyes. Never heard of them being mistaken for latinos but I could see that happening.


Islamophobes target Pakistanis all the time, it also depends where in Germany you reside, some cities are more liberal than others, some not so.


As for Pakistanis coming in all shades and colours, I agree, never said otherwise, it is your countrymen who try to pander the line that Pakistanis are white and are more Arab and Persian than they're South Asian.


They uphold the fair skinned Pakistanis, whilst relegating the millions of darker ones to the back seat, if that doesn't say inferiority complex, I don't know what does.


You can see some Pakistanis on here regularly berate others for being darker, some are even unabashedly praising Nixon's remarks, whilst others try to portray themselves as rare district white race just propped up in the middle brown people by some miracle.

It doesn't work that way, you're innately related to your neighbours and South Asia was one region and millions of people from former Raj live in the pakistan of today, so attempting to say that Pakistanis are racially different from Indians is laughable.
some Pakistanis might equate fair skin with beauty , but not all , I for one think that many darker **** girls are prettier than lighter ones.Pakistanis are Pakistanis, we dont want to associate with arabs or middle easterners , we just say we have distinct identity from other south asians as well.
 
.
some Pakistanis might equate fair skin with beauty , but not all , I for one think that many darker **** girls are prettier than lighter ones.Pakistanis are Pakistanis, we dont want to associate with arabs or middle easterners , we just say we have distinct identity from other south asians as well.


Then you're as your username suggest : Progressive. :-)


Distinct identity and culture, yes perhaps, 75 years together is enough to form your own identity as a nation.
 
.
What does it matter, me a brown skinned Bangladeshi was made to feel more at home in Germany by my German friends than the slightly fair skinned Pakistanis.


Was invited to many a parties whilst the fair skinned Pakistanis were not, they're mistaken for Arabs which has certain repercussions in Europe.

Not that their own reputation is great, whether that is justified or not is another issue, which I don't need to comment on.

While they would face racism day in and day out, there wasn't a single instance where I felt hard done by because of my skin colour.


Our reputation and the reputation of Bangladesh in Europe is quite good (excluding the UK, there we have a special kind of reputation), many people do not know much about Bangladesh and those who do have positive views about us.

We are seen as industrious and dedicated to our work, indeed you can notice this spirit in the grassroots level of our society, the rickshaw pullers, making sacrifices everyday for a better tomorrow, same for our expatriate brothers in middle East (the labourers) and same for the ones in Europe, who come as farmhands and then go from rags to riches through decades of hard work, you think people don't notice but they do; it shapes perceptions.

So in that context, I'd rather be a brown Bengali than a supermodel Pakistani with 3 shades of lighter skin.



But then again, this is just my experience, and speaking of seeking validation and acknowledgement from whites, that is more prevalent in Pakistan and India than in Bangladesh, hell whites barely visit Bangladesh.


A white woman got involved in reporting about Pakistani politics (forgot her name but she made a lot of rape accusations against Pak politicians and what not - Cynthia Richie) and PDF went Gaga for her, so that goes to shows who is actually seeking validation.

Trying to be Turkish and Arab doesn't exactly scream : I'm at peace with myself either.

But I believe this Particular pakistani user, I have observed his posts and it checks out, he probably doesn't really care what people think but I won't say the same for the majority of Pakistanis abroad.






Could be, but what I'm trying to say is skin colour doesn't matter but some of your countrymen think otherwise.


And every Pakistani I've known here has told me they get mistaken for North Africans and Arabs all the time and that people are racist to them, I've even seen this with my own eyes. Never heard of them being mistaken for latinos but I could see that happening.


Islamophobes target Pakistanis all the time, it also depends where in Germany you reside, some cities are more liberal than others, some not so.


As for Pakistanis coming in all shades and colours, I agree, never said otherwise, it is your countrymen who try to pander the line that Pakistanis are white and are more Arab and Persian than they're South Asian.


They uphold the fair skinned Pakistanis, whilst relegating the millions of darker ones to the back seat, if that doesn't say inferiority complex, I don't know what does.


You can see some Pakistanis on here regularly berate others for being darker, some are even unabashedly praising Nixon's remarks, whilst others try to portray themselves as rare district white race just propped up in the middle brown people by some miracle.

It doesn't work that way, you're innately related to your neighbours and South Asia was one region and millions of people from former Raj live in the pakistan of today, so attempting to say that Pakistanis are racially different from Indians is laughable.







So Pusthun Pakistanis who make up 40% of Pakistan's population are racially the same as tamil south indians or ANY other indian group?.............:disagree:.............:lol:


Even Pakistani Punjabis who make up 50% of Pakistan's population have ONLY a marginal link to no more than 2% of indian's population.


Pakistan was only ever a part of a "united" south asia for about 150 years during the British Raj. That's it. The area that is now modern day Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran were one nation/empire for over 1500 years. That doesn't make us all the same people just as it doesn't make us indian or related to them...........:lol:


Here is the gentic map of Pakistanis compared to indians:

 
Last edited:
.
some Pakistanis might equate fair skin with beauty , but not all , I for one think that many darker **** girls are prettier than lighter ones.Pakistanis are Pakistanis, we dont want to associate with arabs or middle easterners , we just say we have distinct identity from other south asians as well.





Even dark skinned Pakistanis have different features and a different physiology compared to indians.
 
.
Even dark skinned Pakistanis have different features and a different physiology compared to indians.

In 20-25 years time do you want to live in a Mars settlement which will have people from various Earth countries and races i.e if Earth peoples don't form into a single nation by then ?
 
Last edited:
.
Could be, but what I'm trying to say is skin colour doesn't matter but some of your countrymen think otherwise.


And every Pakistani I've known here has told me they get mistaken for North Africans and Arabs all the time and that people are racist to them, I've even seen this with my own eyes. Never heard of them being mistaken for latinos but I could see that happening.


Islamophobes target Pakistanis all the time, it also depends where in Germany you reside, some cities are more liberal than others, some not so.


As for Pakistanis coming in all shades and colours, I agree, never said otherwise, it is your countrymen who try to pander the line that Pakistanis are white and are more Arab and Persian than they're South Asian.


They uphold the fair skinned Pakistanis, whilst relegating the millions of darker ones to the back seat, if that doesn't say inferiority complex, I don't know what does.


You can see some Pakistanis on here regularly berate others for being darker, some are even unabashedly praising Nixon's remarks, whilst others try to portray themselves as rare district white race just propped up in the middle brown people by some miracle.

It doesn't work that way, you're innately related to your neighbours and South Asia was one region and millions of people from former Raj live in the pakistan of today, so attempting to say that Pakistanis are racially different from Indians is laughable.









If as you say Pakistanis are "innately related to their neighbours" then Pakistanis are related to Afghans and Iranians as Pakistan shares significant borders with these two nations. We are not over 2500 kms away from them like we are from bangladesh.
 
.
In 20-25 years time do you want to live in a Mars settlement which will have people from various Earth countries and races i.e if Earth peoples don't form into a single nation by then ?

Even in the future, a Pakistani will still be Pakistani, and an Indian or BD will not be a Pakistani.

Why you guys try to dilute our identity? We have problems as it is due to Hindus trying to steal IVC and ancient Pakistani history.

Now Pakistan is attempting to brand itself, but Indian and BD retrogressives are still stuck trying to make us South Asian and Indian.

We are not, we are Eurasian and share genetics more with Iranians and Afghans than anyone East of our border.
 
.
Even in the future, a Pakistani will still be Pakistani, and an Indian or BD will not be a Pakistani.

Why you guys try to dilute our identity? We have problems as it is due to Hindus trying to steal IVC and ancient Pakistani history.

Now Pakistan is attempting to brand itself, but Indian and BD retrogressives are still stuck trying to make us South Asian and Indian.

We are not, we are Eurasian and share genetics more with Iranians and Afghans than anyone East of our border.






The term "south asian" was first used by the British colonialists to bunch a whole region together so it would be easier for them to rule. That's it. Nothing more. Contrary to indian propaganda and myths, there NEVER was a "united south asian" heritage or people.
 
.
Now Pakistan is attempting to brand itself, but Indian and BD retrogressives are still stuck trying to make us South Asian and Indian.

We are not, we are Eurasian and share genetics more with Iranians and Afghans than anyone East of our border.

Bhai, then nationalist Pakistanis should appeal to the UNO to remove you from "South Asia" category and put you and Afghanistan into "Central Asia" or "West Asia". :)

Even in the future, a Pakistani will still be Pakistani, and an Indian or BD will not be a Pakistani.

In 25 years Earth will be communist, without current national borders and with even more intermingling of races / peoples. This is logical. This is progress.

And please answer to my point about Mars settlement that I said to @PAKISTANFOREVER.
 
Last edited:
.
The term "south asian" was first used by the British colonialists to bunch a whole region together so it would be easier for them to rule. That's it. Nothing more. Contrary to indian propaganda and myths, there NEVER was a "united south asian" heritage or people.

Then please appeal to the UNO to remove Pakistan from "South Asia" category and include you into "Central Asia" or "West Asia".
 
.
Well I don't recall where, but Kissinger sure did right here. See the first post. It's common knowledge that both Nixon and Kissinger saw both Pakistan and India as pawns.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Kissinger voiced prejudices about Pakistanis, too. On Aug. 10, 1971, while discussing with Mr. Nixon whether the Pakistani junta would execute the imprisoned leader of the Bengali nationalists, Mr. Kissinger told the president, “I tell you, the Pakistanis are fine people, but they are primitive in their mental structure.” He added, “They just don’t have the subtlety of the Indians.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It's logical not to expect any less....Nixon was not a friend of either country. He used Pakistani folks to build relationships and detente with China during the cold war.

I don't consider supplying surplus obsolete fighters like F86's and M24/M3 tanks to Pakistan as too friendly a gesture, which were heavily underwhelming against what India wielded at the time. But what do I know?

Look at the following, you may find something of interest,

https://www.brownpundits.com/2014/07/31/eye-in-sky-us-pakistan-u2-and-so-on/

Look in the timeline about 51:30 in the tape here,


Although he didn't use the right word, we Pakistanis do have a different mentality than other nations. We have a more religious and black/white view of the world than others, however our hospitality is well known, even to Indians.

Now that is an undeniable truth. :lol:


also true

bottomless basket

half of Pakistanis migrated from India and were Indians until 1947... by effect still associated with them... no matter how much pseudoethnic identity one might try to pose

Anytime there is a chance to abuse Pakistanis, there you are. Is 1971 replaying in your mind nonstop?

LOL.

You can't be serious.

Again, same topic, and he you are again putting down Pakistani identity. Can't say I am surprised. Difficult to stay out?

I find some younger folks in PDF to be a bit immature.

All Indians aren't ugly, and all Pakistanis aren't models.

Same goes for Bangladeshis.

I am amazed that we are even discussing such things....this is 2020, the age of the Internet.

Whether you like or dislike someone's looks is your own personal opinion, and no more.

Pakistanis have every right to frame our identity. BD is no longer is part of Pakistan, so you do not have that right.

I don't know why you guys want us to identify as Indian and Sourh Asian, when clearly we are not. 1971 was a natural event, it was going to happen regardless.

Let us just accept we are different countries with different mentalities and move on.

You don't see Pakistanis passing judgement on what BD think of themselves. We don't care.

You also should not care how we view ourselves and our culture.
 
.
Bhai, then nationalist Pakistanis should appeal to the UNO to remove you from "South Asia" category and put you and Afghanistan into "Central Asia" or "West Asia".

Slowly but surely some organizations have begun shifting our designation to Central Asian, based on our genetics and our geography.

In 25 years Earth will be communist, without current national borders and with even more intermingling of races / peoples. This is logical. This is progress.

And please answer to my point about Mars settlement that I said to @PAKISTANFOREVER.

Pakistani has now become a marker for our identity and it will stay.

I expect this of Hindus who have Pakistan obsession, but Indian and BD Muslim Brothers should leave framing of Pakistani identity to us Pakistanis.

I wish we Pakistanis on PDF atleast can be left to discuss who we are, without judgement from outsiders.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistani has now become a marker for our identity and it will stay.

I expect this of Hindus who have Pakistan obsession, but Indian and BD Muslim Brothers should leave framing of Pakistani identity to us Pakistanis.

I wish we Pakistanis on PDF atleast can be left to discuss who we are, without judgement from outsiders.

Well, I would like your view on the below poster from the 2020 Aurat March in Islamabad. You can see the globalist / transnational sentiment in it :

5c8b90bcdb270.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom