Saif al-Arab
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 8,873
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Iran's reputation got worse than that of Israel. It is Iran's own fault for this reputation. They profit from conflict. Iran supported the massacre of 300k women and children in Syria. I think Iran won't be able to recover from this. They screwed up big time for short term gains but on long term there will the grave consequences.
I would say that Iran is more loathed in the Arab world nowadays than Israel. People are realizing who the real enemy is. Any future relationship with them will be strictly business related.
Besides 21% of Israel's population are Arabs and over 2/3's of all Israeli Jews are of Arab Jewish or partial Arab Jewish origin. There is really no need to dislike them at all once the Palestinian question has been settled.
In any case the antipathy was always against the Israeli state and Zionism and not Jews per se.
Yup, it should have been done long long time ago, we should not depend on the west. Indonesia in the past even invaded East Timor for geopolitical reason ( fighting the communist ) under a calm leader (Soeharto) while USA lost war in Vietnam. We also helped Malaysia and sent special force to deal with its communist rebel during Soeharto regime.
Another reason of why ground troops should be prepared for Syria case is to learn what is happening in Libya currently. Situation in Libya could have been more controllable if GCC put troops there in the past to kick Gaddafi out instead of relying on rebel who is consisted of different group and different agenda.
The problem here is that Syria unlike East Timor is not a tiny island country but a nation of 25 million people located in the heart of the MENA region almost. Also you have to remember that there is the Russian factor. It is basically what stops USA and regional powers from moving into Syria. The Americans and Russia already wage a war on the Ukrainian front. They don't need another. For them Syria is not important. It has little geopolitical importance, there is no oil and gas and quite frankly they probably consider all sides in that conflict to be bad. After all it's just Muslims and then a few Christian Arabs. This is something that the regional players have to solve. I still hope that the upcoming joint Arab military force together with our Turkish neighbors and the international community (more likely only limited to political support which is fair enough) will deal with Syria or at least stabilize it. This civil war cannot go on.
GCC had little to do with Libya. It was a NATO operation. Also Libya is far from everyone. A huge country geographically with just 8 million people, all mostly located in the coastal regions. It gets less attention because of its geographical location and lack of influence. Hopefully things will stabilize if not then divide Libya into two (Western and Eastern Libya) or 3 parts. The three historical parts were/are Tripolitania, Fezzan and Cyrenaica.
As I see it then it's all part of a power vacuum. People have to find their feet post revolution and find their right place in the region and world community. Such things tend to take a LOOONG time historically everywhere. Especially after being ruled by a madman for 40+ years who although had good sides was mostly a bad/incompetent leader.
2011 military intervention in Libya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
P.S: Did you know that the first East Timorian (?) prime minister was of Arab (Hadhrami) ancestry like around 15 million South East Asians?
Mari Alkatiri - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Apparently dozens of Sultans, prime ministers, presidents, military generals in South East Asia have been of Arab ancestry. Including the current Sultan of Brunei and his family. I found this out yesterday after additional research.
Going head to head with Iran and Hezbollah, I don't think so remember Saudis were humiliated when US rejected bombing Syria for you. You had 4 years to do so if you could you would. 10 countries ganging up on the poorest Arab country is nothing to be proud of. Remember your royals barely cling on to Bahrain, you wouldn't want external forces overtly disturbing Bahrain like what Qatar and KSA did in Syria.
Nobody begged anybody for anything. Likewise the current coalition will do just fine without Pakistan. It was always about political support. Not troops. The US themselves invented "red lines" that if crossed would lead to consequences for the murderous Al-Assad regime. Obama failed to deliver on his own words. Not of that of anybody else.
President Obama and the ‘red line’ on Syria’s chemical weapons - The Washington Post
In any case he will be gone in precisely 21 months. Likely to be replaced by Republicans. Thank God.
Nobody has intervened in Syria directly. Did you ever bother to think why that is so?
Bahrain is 100% fully in control of KSA and the GCC and no external (read Iranian Mullah's) are able to do anything about it. If they could they would have done so LOOONG ago. You are fooling nobody.