What's new

The sikh rule in Hazara Division

New Recruit

Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Panama
this article by abid shah is about the sikh period in hazara division,KPK province,Pakistan.
With the death of Emperor Aurangzeb Alamgir in 1707 the inhabitants of the Sub continent witnesses some drastic changes in the country. During the closing days of the 18th century A.D. the escalation in the militant Sikh power in the areas now known as Punjab, K.P.K and Kashmir was also a visible change in this regard. It was about this time that the famous Sikh chief Ranjet Singh (1776-1838) son of Mahan Singh rose to the prominence, and proclaimed himself independent of the Kabul regime. He organises his Khalsa Army on modern lines and subjugated extensive areas. Upto 1818, a large territory of the so called now a days Punjab was captured by his army , but the Sikh rule was not extended to Hazara until the above mentioned date.
After consolidating his military strength Ranjit Singh wished to extend his sway over other area. In Hazara the opportunity for interference in the internal affairs of the region was provided to him by the Turk Chief Hashim Khan of Mankarai in 1818. About the event it is reported that in 1816 Hashim khan had murdered his fellow chief Kamal khan. The latter was a friend of Muhammad Khan, The Tareen chief. Kamal Khan,s cause was espoused by the Tareen chief and he to-gather with Faith Khan son of Kamal Khan took revenge from Hashim Khan. The later, after a crushing defeat met Hukma Singh, the Sikh Governor of Attock and to save himself betrayed his country to the Sikhs.
The latte was a friend of Muhammad Khan, The tareen chief Kamal khan’s cause was espoused by the tareen chief and he together with Faith Khan Son of Kamal khan took revenge from Hashim Khan. The latter after a crushing defeat met Hukma Singh the Sikh Governor of Attock and to save himself betrayed his country to the Sikhs. At his (Hashim khans) invitation Makhan Singh the Sikh governor of Rawalpindi, invaded lower Hazara with 500 horsemen in 1818, built a fort at Sarai Salah and collected taxes from the Haripur plain.
By 1820 Ranjit Singh reigned supreme from Sutlej to the Indus but his hold on Hazara was weak, and within a short period his three prominent general Mahan Singh, Diwan Ramdial and Sardar Amar Singh Majethia were killed in this area.
At least Maharajah Ranjit Singh summoned his commander Hari Singh Nalwa (after whom the Haripur town is named ) from Kashmir. At the same time the people of this area rose in open revolt against the shaky Singh Government. Hari Singh after his arrival took drastic measures in this area, besides construction of a fort at Nawashr erection of the Haripur fort (where tehsil offices and police station Haripur are housed now a days) which known as Hari Kishangar and was strongly constructed was a important step of the Sikh General and largely contributed to the establishment of Sikh power in this area.
Besides being a man of unbounded energy and courage, the Sikh general was cruel man, and ruthless in his treatment of those who crossed his path. During his more than fourteen years rule with some intervals, he burnt as well as. Tamed several villages and tool many steps to intimidate the people of this area. Besides his other atrocious actions and measures levy of the land revenue amounting to one half of the total value of the crops was absolutely an action of cruelty. He (Hari Singh) was so merciless in his actions that up to the beginning of the 20thcentury he remained an ogre invoked by mothers to frighten their naughty children. Throughout the 31 years of Sikh rule over Hazara the people of the area harbored great hatred in their hearts for their rulers. They never accepted the Sikh rule by heart and missed no opportunity to over throw them. In a short period of three years after the advent of the Sikh in this area besides several hundred Sikh soldiers, three capable Sikh General were murdered. The opposition by some 20,000 Jadoons and Tawawalies against Hari Singh at Mangal in 1822, a battle between the Sikhs and the Mashwanies and the Utmanzaies at Nara in 1824 and a revolt against Diwan Molrah Dilwalia in 1846 are some of the instances of the hostility o the people against the Sikhs.
Establishing a viable system of administration over those people who were constantly in a state of bitter hostility against their rulers was a difficult task for the Sikhs, to some extent Hari Singh with an iron hand succeeded in this purpose but no one among the rest of 13 Sikhs Governors, during the 31 years Sikh rules was able to establish a firm control over Hazara.
Beside the fact the area was divided into several estates among them several were directly controlled by the Sikhs themselves while the others were leases to some powerful persons of the area. People were administered by their respective chiefs among whom several were paid large allowances as well as Jagirs. Unlike the Duranies the Sikhs collections of land revenue was of more systematic nature which was collected in the usual Sikh fashion viz either direct from the land lord, by appraisement of the crop value (the share of the government being one half the total crop value) of through the farmers, to whom the land of the villages was leased. Though Diwan Molraj during his tenure i.e. from 1843 to 1846. Made systematic revision but his rule was harsh and harassing to the people due to which many of them evacuated their villages to escape his extortions.
In the early days of 1837, Mahan Singh succeeded Hari Singh as Governor of Hazara, but was recalled in October 1837 and Sardar Teja Singh was sent from Lahore to replace him. During the latter’s period of governorship nothing happened worth mentioning except the great flood in the Indus of the 2nd and 4th of June 1841. This flood was caused by the bursting of Dam which a land slid has caused across the river in the higher reaches. At the time of the flood the Sikhs were busy fighting with the Army of Painda Khan the Tawawal chief in the hills to the east of river Indus. The water rushed down with a mighty roar sweeping away the Sikhs fort at Darband and Tarbela. Numerous villages on either side of the river and the whole of the Sikh encampment with baggage, magazine and several guns. At site the remaining forces stopped their fighting and on receipt of Painda Khan’s message to the Sikh leader saying that “GOD has judged them and made each side as helpless as the other. They disengaged themselves and marched back to their camps. Tanawal and Haripur respectively.
In the winter if 1841 Ghulab Singh was appointed governor of this District by Kunwar Partab Singh, but after the murder of the latter in September 1843 Lahore Darbar took over charge of Punjab on behalf of the boy Dulip Singh and sent Diwan Molraj Deilwalia distinct from Diwan Molraj (Governor of Multan) as the governor of this area. Through like Hari Singh he also took some drastic measures in this District but was met with much resistance from the natives.
The disintegration of the Sikh government of Lahore, after the death of Ranjit Singh paved the way for the annexation of the Punjab by the British. Thus the weakened Sikh rule also gave the tribes of Hazara an opportunity of regaining their power of the Pre Sikh rule. Disturbances starts in the area during February 1846 and several tribes rose in open revolt. The Dhunds, headed by their religious leaders pirs of Palasi were the first to rise. They stormed several areas and defeated two Sigh detachments sent against them. Mean while a remnant of the Mujahidin of Balakot, declaring that Khalifa Syed Ahmed was not dead and would soon reappear collected at Kawai in Kaghan area a large Mujahid force attack several forts and slew their garrisons.
The same was done by the Mashwanies the Tanawalies and other tribes in their respective area.
During the same time Molraj desire to put down these disturbances had been thwarted by the refusal of his spare troops to march into Northern Hazara. The Jadoons and the Tareens also assembled under their respective chiefs and on 7th March 1846 attacked the Haripur town. Though after some times order was restores in the area especially in the lower Hazara but in reality Diwan Molraj had lost heart and evacuated the Haripur Fort on 16th of April 1846.
At the time Diwan Molraj left Haripur an attempt was made throughout the District to restore its status as it had existed prior to the Sikh rule. For this purpose the chiefs of different tribes of the area assembled at Haripur and appointed Syed Akbar Shah of Sithana (a village situated in the left bank of driver Indus) as their ruler with Nawab khan Tanawli and Ghulam Khan Tareen as his minister. This period was popularly spoken if in Hazara as the Lundi Maslamani the term Lundi Signifies incomplete.
But the hopes of the people were doomed to almost immediate frustration when on 19th Of March
1846 a peace was concluded between the Sikhs and the British government. A peace treaty was signed and according to its 12th article all the hilly and mountainous country with its dependencies, situated East ward of the river Indus and West ward of River Ravi were ceded to Raja Ghulab Singh. Their transfer to Kashmir was intensely distasteful to the people of this area. Resistance started on a large scale to the nominee of Raja Ghulab Singh. Through over its lower part of the Sikh had some control but in the upper Hazara people collectively made things uncomfortable for their new ruler and the Sikh Army was defeated at many places.
Thus finding his newly acquired territory a veritable hornets he (Raja Ghulab Singh) was only too ready to get rid of it if a suitable exchange could be agreed upon. Early in 1847 he induced the Lahore Darbar to take over from him all the hilly country west of river Jehlum in return for a tract near Jammu. This request of the Raja was accepted by the Lahore Darbar and a Tract near Jammun, in exchange for the hilly region of Hazara was awarded to him.
 
Terrible period in history. I'm glad the Pakhtun tribes in Hazara fought them and gave them no rest, as did the people of Azad Kashmir.
 
Terrible period in history. I'm glad the Pakhtun tribes in Hazara fought them and gave them no rest, as did the people of Azad Kashmir.
sikh rulers weren,t much different from aurangzeb when it came to cruelty,i am also glad they were defeated.
 
Terrible period in history. I'm glad the Pakhtun tribes in Hazara fought them and gave them no rest, as did the people of Azad Kashmir.
I'm aware of the brave Pathans of KPK resisting the Sikhs. They resisted everyone including the Mughals and even Durani/Afghan rule they would rebel, so Sikh rule was no different. Later they resisted the British and today they are doing it again in the form of TTP.

By the way, what resistance did the Mirpuris put up against Punjabi rule? after the Sikhs, they were ruled by the Dogras weren't they?
 
Last edited:
Only Pashtun tribes of hazara resisted against sikh occupation. E.g read about these guy

Muhammad Khan Tarin
Bostan Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sardar Ghulam Khan Tarin

Sir Olaf Caroe writes about mashwani tribe of hazara,

"The people of central and lower Hazara are some of them Pathans, but most of these, including the Yusufzais, Jaduns, and Tarins, have adopted the ways and language of the northern Panjab. The so-called `Swatis' of Mansehra in the north are descendants of the older inhabitants of Swat driven across the Indus when the Pathans conquered Swat just before Babur's time. The Hazara Yusufzais of Kalabhat and Torbela are true Pathans in blood, but their proximity to Panjabi tribes has caused them to lose their language and something of their Pakhtunwali. There remains, however, the client tribe of Mashwanis who had so much troubled Hari Singh, true Pathans living in the Gandghar mountain between the Indus and the Hazara Valley. Their centre is at a group of villages named Srikot, tucked away in the recesses of this range of hills. Here these Mashwanis have preserved a picaresque Pathan life of their own, changing little over the decades and even the centuries. To visit Srikot is to reverse the process undergone by Rip Van Winkle, and to live again in the Pathan world of Babur's time. The traveller, struggling up one of the glens on a stumbling horse — there are no carriage-ways into Gandghar — will find himself greeted by a fusillade, and surrounded by groups of tribesmen who look like marauders, but are in fact pensioner subadars of the army. They are a lovable and a loyal folk.
 
Last edited:
I'm aware of the brave Pathans of KPK resisting the Sikhs. They resisted everyone including the Mughals and even Durani/Afghan rule they would rebel, so Sikh rule was no different. Later they resisted the British and today they are doing it again in the form of TTP.

By the way, what resistance did the Mirpuris put up against Punjabi rule? after the Sikhs, they were ruled by the Dogras weren't they?

Hello Jaggu. Resistance was quite a great deal actually and throughout the ages.


Kashmiriat and the illusion of Kashmiri independence | Hard News

The Mirpuris had a long history of resistance and rebellion long before that. When the Dogra ruler, Gulab Singh, took over Mirpur, the Mirpuris, led by local rajas, staged several revolts, which were cruelly crushed. Raja Sultan Khan of Bhimber, a Chibb Rajput, was captured, brutally tortured and blinded. He died in prison. The Gakkhar Rajputs of Mirpur and the Mangral Rajputs in Kotli also rose up in revolt. So did several others. Although these local resistance movements were forcibly put down, the fires of revolt continued to simmer, as the Mirpuris regarded the Dogra rulers as oppressive foreigners and invaders and they hated them. - See more at: Kashmiriat and the illusion of Kashmiri independence | Hard News


Another thing is that the Dogras were never able to put down revolts themselves but had to rely on significant British army assistance.

To suppress the movement, the Maharaja of Kashmir called in British troops who unleashed a wave of terror. - See more at: Kashmiriat and the illusion of Kashmiri independence | Hard News



Once they left they (Dogras) were pretty much smashed up by the people of Azad Kashmir. Here is a detailed account from the book

KASHMIR - THE UNTOLD STORY
By Christopher Snedden

KASHMIR - THE UNTOLD STORY - Christopher Snedden - Google Books



Conflicts against the Sikhs.

Wіth the rise оf Sikh power іn Punjab, Maharaja Ranjit Singhestablished hіs supremacy аnd set hіs eyes оn the Chibh states оf Bhimber аnd Khari Khariyali. Іn 1810, а force wаs sent against Raja Sultan Khan оf Bhimber аnd wаs met wіth fierce resistance. However, іn 1812 another Sikh army under prince Kharak Singh defeated Sultan Khan аnd the Bhimber state wаs annexed аs Jagir оf Kharak Singh. Around the same time, Ranjit Singh acquired Gujrat аnd invaded Khari Khariyali ruled by Raja Umar Khan. Raja Umar Khan made peace wіth Ranjit Singh. But before а settlement cоuld be made, he died аnd the state аnd Mirpur became part оf Ranjit Singh's territories.

Mirpur


By the way the 1810 battle is remembered by many people from my region as the day we beat back a far larger and better equipped Sikh army. Sultan Khan Bhimberi is a hero and legend to us all.

Sikh armies did eventually conquer Azad Kashmir, but this was inevitable as they were the best equipped, trained and ideologically (Khalsa) driven army in the sub-cotinent, that also benefited from many European advisors.


Two things also, the Mirpuris make up a part of Azad Kashmir and much of the revolts and wars were led by the people of Kotli, Bhimber, Muzzaffrabad and tribes like the Sudhans.
Also the TTP are terrorists and have no wholesale support and therefore is not comparable to the noble Pakhtun conflicts of the past.
 
Only Pashtun tribes of hazara resisted against sikh occupation. E.g read about these guy

Muhammad Khan Tarin
Bostan Khan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sardar Ghulam Khan Tarin

Sir Olaf Caroe writes about mashwani tribe of hazara,

"The people of central and lower Hazara are some of them Pathans, but most of these, including the Yusufzais, Jaduns, and Tarins, have adopted the ways and language of the northern Panjab. The so-called `Swatis' of Mansehra in the north are descendants of the older inhabitants of Swat driven across the Indus when the Pathans conquered Swat just before Babur's time. The Hazara Yusufzais of Kalabhat and Torbela are true Pathans in blood, but their proximity to Panjabi tribes has caused them to lose their language and something of their Pakhtunwali. There remains, however, the client tribe of Mashwanis who had so much troubled Hari Singh, true Pathans living in the Gandghar mountain between the Indus and the Hazara Valley. Their centre is at a group of villages named Srikot, tucked away in the recesses of this range of hills. Here these Mashwanis have preserved a picaresque Pathan life of their own, changing little over the decades and even the centuries. To visit Srikot is to reverse the process undergone by Rip Van Winkle, and to live again in the Pathan world of Babur's time. The traveller, struggling up one of the glens on a stumbling horse — there are no carriage-ways into Gandghar — will find himself greeted by a fusillade, and surrounded by groups of tribesmen who look like marauders, but are in fact pensioner subadars of the army. They are a lovable and a loyal folk.

I'm not sure about the whole "adopting" customs of Northern Punjab. Sure they speak Hindko, but the vast majority are also fluent in Pashto. Regarding Pakhtunwali, it depends on the family. But they still are Pakhtuns to everyone.
 
:) Hazara is one such area which still retains the old names of that Sikh/Brit/ xyz era .

and swatis resisted ? lolzz well no they dint .

It always the internal mir jaffars who brought attacks upon own Muslims even to end their rule.


anyway Hazara still have traces of Sanskrit in its local languages
 
:) Hazara is one such area which still retains the old names of that Sikh/Brit/ xyz era .

and swatis resisted ? lolzz well no they dint .

It always the internal mir jaffars who brought attacks upon own Muslims even to end their rule.


anyway Hazara still have traces of Sanskrit in its local languages

You mean Hindko language? Its indo-aryan language and dialect of punjabi. And since original indo-aryan language was Sanskrit, so of course it will have traces of Sanskrit.
 
Back
Top Bottom