What's new

The REAL reason why the US hates ISIS

Superboy

BANNED
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
-7
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
It's because ISIS does not actively fight Assad. The US hates Russia, because Russia is a superpower and the US is jealous of Russia's huge territory. The US hates Assad because Assad is a puppet of Russia. That's why the US demonizes ISIS but not other Islamist groups like Islamic Front and Nusra Front who fight Assad more. Do you agree?
 
That would translate into saying "The US will fund and support ISIS if it agrees to fight Assad". The answer is no. Maybe 30 years back - not now.
 
That would translate into saying "The US will fund and support ISIS if it agrees to fight Assad". The answer is no. Maybe 30 years back - not now.


If ISIS fights Assad, then yes the US would fund and back ISIS. The US hates Russia and hates Assad who is a puppet of Russia.
 
Go to bed Superboy MOSSAD super troll, we have thousands of zionist ISIS videos attack SAA, and only 1 or 2 fake videos of FSA infighting with zionist ISIS
 
The Islamic Front and Nusra massacred thousands of Alawites in Latakia with the approval and backing from the US. The US hates Russia and China.
 
If ISIS fights Assad, then yes the US would fund and back ISIS. The US hates Russia and hates Assad who is a puppet of Russia.

Russia is not a global threat - ISIS is. The US is capable (after decades of not being capable) of distinguishing their tactical enemies from parasite organizations.
 
Russia is not a global threat - ISIS is. The US is capable (after decades of not being capable) of distinguishing their tactical enemies from parasite organizations.


The US created ISIS to kill Assad. ISIS turned on the US. Just as the US put Saddam in power to kill Iranians, then Saddam turned on the US.
 
Why US hates ISIS??
No one fcking loves ISIS.... You have to be sick and sadistic to love ISIS

What next? Why Indians hate ISIS for no harm done to them?
 
Actually the US created them in the first place- accidentally perhaps, but what did they think would happen when you arm a bunch of militants in an already unstable region to try to overthrow their government? Nothing good, that's for sure.

When the militants saw that they got nothing by fighting a bloody, long war with Assad, they looked at the ripe, juicy landscape of Iraq like a hungry wolf looks at a prey and took advantage of the vulnerability in Iraq, forming ISIS and launching an invasion.

The ISIS militants were all battle-hardened and well equipped (thanks to the US's generous support), giving them an edge over the Iraqis who were probably not sure which side they were on themselves. ISIS's victories may have come as a surprise to the US but they shouldn't have repeated the same mistake as with Afghanistan during the soviet invasion, or as with Iran-Iraq, or every other militant proxy the US has used.
 
Why US hates ISIS??
No one fcking loves ISIS.... You have to be sick and sadistic to love ISIS

What next? Why Indians hate ISIS for no harm done to them?


The Islamic Front and Nusra do horrible things, often more horrible than what ISIS does. The US backs them as long as they kill Alawites. The US hates Russia.
 
Why US hates ISIS??
No one fcking loves ISIS.... You have to be sick and sadistic to love ISIS

What next? Why Indians hate ISIS for no harm done to them?
Emotions and morality have no place in geopolitics, unfortunately. The US would no doubt support ISIS if they would have just fought Assad as the US had intended, these are the same militants funded and supported by the US against the Syrian government. These are the "moderate rebels".
Right now, since ISIS got so much media coverage and all the stuff they did, the US would never support them directly. But they continue to support many of the other rebel groups in Syria, which no doubt have certain ties with ISIS. (trading weaponry, smuggling, communications, that sort of thing - militants co-operate a lot)
 
The Islamic Front and Nusra do horrible things, often more horrible than what ISIS does. The US backs them as long as they kill Alawites. The US hates Russia.


US hates or doesnt hate. It does not matter. It is the duty of Islamic countries to put their house in order not the americans.

When the americans intervene it is the same islamic countries who sideline themselves saying they are not muslims raise the slogans of phuck amreeka
 
The US created ISIS to kill Assad. ISIS turned on the US. Just as the US put Saddam in power to kill Iranians, then Saddam turned on the US.
The US trained members of the Free Syrian Army, some of whom later defected to ISIS. That's very different from saying the US supported ISIS. It never did. I'm not a defender of US foreign policy but some people on this forum need to look at the facts instead of delving into cheap conspiracy theories.
 
US hates or doesnt hate. It does not matter. It is the duty of Islamic countries to put their house in order not the americans.

When the americans intervene it is the same islamic countries who sideline themselves saying they are not muslims raise the slogans of phuck amreeka
When the US funds and supports militants in a misguided attempt to overthrow Assad, it does matter, just like it mattered when the US, via Pakistan, created the Taliban to fight the Soviets or when they supported Saddam Hussein against Iran.

When the americans intervene
When the Americans intervene it is all for their political and strategic goals- never out of goodwill. When America created those problems in the first place, how do you expect Muslims to react?
I agree that us Muslims should get our shit together but lets not forget that America isn't full of angels either.

The US trained members of the Free Syrian Army, some of whom later defected to ISIS. That's very different from saying the US supported ISIS. It never did. I'm not a defender of US foreign policy but some people on this forum need to look at the facts instead of delving into cheap conspiracy theories.
Dude, it's obvious. ISIS formed out of the US aided rebels. They never supported ISIS but they certainly supported extremist militants. Whatever these militants did or however they changed doesn't matter - The US was wrong to support militants. They should have learned that since Afghanistan. But I don't think they care, as long as their goals are fulfilled.
 
When the US funds and supports militants in a misguided attempt to overthrow Assad, it does matter, just like it mattered when the US, via Pakistan, created the Taliban to fight the Soviets or when they supported Saddam Hussein against Iran.


When the Americans intervene it is all for their political and strategic goals- never out of goodwill. When America created those problems in the first place, how do you expect Muslims to react?
I agree that us Muslims should get our shit together but lets not forget that America isn't full of angels either.


Yet again the problem is with Islamic countries. When anything goes wrong you guys play dumb and deaf. Maximum Islamic countries will condone or declare each other unislamic. Thats it.

Now this gives US a free hand to deal with the situation according to their interest. And the very same islamic countries who were playing dumb and deaf will start calling for phuck amreekan. Why should they care if people in afghanistan die and people cry a river in middle east for it? they are not their civilians.

ISIS is not US domestic problem. No islamic country took the initiative of taking action till US took the initiative.

Half of muslims around the world do not go to sleep without saying "Death to israel" devicing stratergies for it. What about ISIS? Muslims are also suffering under them? But no .... no one will speak up or stand upto them on their own. For that they need America to take initiative.
 
Back
Top Bottom