What's new

The Philippines' Greatest Mistake About China

striver44

BANNED
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
4,832
Reaction score
-16
Country
Indonesia
Location
Indonesia
OPINION
The Philippines' Greatest Mistake About China

by MARIO ALVARO LIMOS | 10 HOURS AGO
941 Shares


PHILIPPINES-GREATEST-MISTAKE-ABOUT-CHINA.jpg

Four years ago, the Philippines made a very unconventional gamble: It decided to abandon its traditional allies and made a very publicized pivot to China.
Read more

For many observers, the move was initially seen as a masterstroke: Leveraging the rivalry between the two superpowers, the Philippines was suddenly in the international spotlight, as the U.S. attempted to win it back with soft power. But America’s oldest Asian ally had decidedly fallen out of its orbit and into its rival’s arms.

In the last four years, the Philippines has kowtowed to China in the face of issues surrounding the West Philippine Sea. Little has been done to assert the country’s sovereign rights in its own waters.

In 2019, the most violent incident occurred in the West Philippine Sea: A Chinese ship rammed a Filipino fishing boat in Reed Bank, a shoal within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone. The Philippines, afraid to displease China, merely shrugged off the incident. “I’m sorry but that’s how it is,” President Rodrigo Duterte told the Filipino fishermen, who were rescued not by China or the Philippine Coast Guard, but by Vietnamese fishermen who witnessed the attack.

china-philippines-relations.jpg

A Chinese Coast Guard Ship

Throughout his presidency, Duterte has made four trips to China, the latest was in April 2019. The trips were seen as opportunities to secure investments for the Philippines. Mere months after Duterte took office, the Philippines trumpeted China’s pledges, which are now worth P1 trillion. But as Duterte nears the end of his presidency, most of China’s promises have not materialized.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Four years on, it seems the gamble has not paid off. The belief in not displeasing China in exchange for investments was an amateur mistake of someone with a poor grasp on Chinese foreign policy.

Until now, the Philippines has yet to receive the much-awaited COVID-19 vaccines from China, and has not even closed a deal with the Chinese as of this writing.

In contrast, Indonesia, which has taken a very strong stance against China on its sea disputes and even sunk a number of confiscated Chinese vessels, has already received 1.2 million initial doses of the vaccine delivered from China last week. Another 1.8 million doses are going to be delivered in January.

Where did the Philippines go wrong in its pivot to China?
“Chinese statecraft has contempt for the weak and the naive,” political analyst Richard Heydarian tells Esquire Philippines. “But China grudgingly respects those with strategic dignity and courage.”

It is ironic how the Philippines saw a significant decrease in Chinese investments in the last four years compared to the previous administration, which successfully took China to court and won.

“People forget that the past administration, which had the audacity to take China to international court and liken their imperial tendencies to those of Nazi Germany, oversaw an increase in Chinese investments,” said Heydarian. “There was no war, skirmishes, or any form of aggression after we filed the arbitration case.”

Former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario shares the same opinion. “China has continued to move forward with its unlawful agenda. Why? Because we allow them to do so,” he told CNN Philippines. Retired Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, who was one of the legal luminaries who laid the groundwork for the Philippines’ case against China, agrees. “Our problem today is that our own government simply doesn't want to displease China,” said Carpio.

Unfortunately, the Philippines burned its most valuable trump card when it decided not to enforce the 2016 ruling in favor of the Philippines. The Philippines was too eager to give up leverage without ensuring strategic reciprocity.

Why China snubbed the Philippines

PHOTO BY PCOO/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. PCOO/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
Utang na loob (debt of gratitude) is a very Filipino concept that Duterte thought would work on China. Utang na loob has been a tenet of this administration, from appointing people to key positions in government to refusing to punish erring officials.

Despite the Philippines’ trumpeted pivot to China, its undignified kowtowing did not produce as many visible results in investments or grants. The lesson, which government leaders seemed to have learned late into night, is that China does not reward favorable foreign policy toward it. It does not think in terms of utang na loob, but in terms of self-interest, like any mature state would.

"We haven't seen a single major concession from China on the West Philippine Sea. And then, China snubbed the Philippines for Indonesia, a country that has taken a much tougher stance against Beijing over maritime disputes, for the first batch of COVID-19 vaccines," said Heydarian.

The Philippines' warm approach toward China did not pay off because China did not need to bargain anything for it. We gave our leverage away for free.

More important, the Chinese Communist Party, which thinks in terms of centuries, knows this sudden shift in foreign policy is not sustainable and will likely end once Duterte steps down from office.

The Philippines has a very long history of standing up to China (while gaining from it), and this has dazzled the international community to a great extent. It is up to the next batch of leaders to correct the misguided pivot to China and assert what is just and equitable for the sake of Filipinos.

++++++++

Indonesia is a perfect case in which you could have all the benefits of having a burgeoning trade with China while not kowtowing with China when it comes to sovereignity.

Kowtowing with China just don't work.
@maverick1977
 
Last edited:
.
Isn't the Philippines, along with Vietnam, the very vocal against against China in the SCS?
Did Duterte actually cancel the US military agreement? NOPE. Just made a show about doing it in order to try and revieve goodies. Like a beggar.
Who has the tiny Catholic Philippine dragon bought warships from? South Korea, Taiwan?, Indonesia?
Fighter jets/Helicopters? South Korea, UK?

In others words there was no pivot. Just an attempt to get some of what the Chinese had accumulated.

Most Filipino men belong to the same y dna haplogroup as the majority of Han Chinese. Those men are Han Chinese. Wonder why Filipinos cannot easily whip Covid? Perhaps it is the centuries of Spanish/American occupation and use of women which made those descendents vulnerable.
 
.
In contrast, Indonesia, which has taken a very strong stance against China on its sea disputes and even sunk a number of confiscated Chinese vessels, has already received 1.2 million initial doses of the vaccine delivered from China last week. Another 1.8 million doses are going to be delivered in January.
At least Philippines has gut to occupy some of disputed islands.
 
Last edited:
.
Philippines should ask for compensation from US which occupied and colonized Philippines for hundred years.
That's the great mistake Philippines ever made in history. If Philippines follow her former master, I will not be surprised that Philippines will be colonized again by US.
 
.
Philippines should ask for compensation from US which occupied and colonized Philippines for hundred years.
That's the great mistake Philippines ever made in history. If Philippines follow her former master, I will not be surprised that Philippines will be colonized again by US.
Hundred of years lmao.
The US entered the Philippines in late 1890s and gave the country independence after ww2.
At least Philippines has gut to occupy some of disputed islands.
Indonesia doesn't have disputed island in the SCS.
 
Last edited:
.
OPINION
The Philippines' Greatest Mistake About China

by MARIO ALVARO LIMOS | 10 HOURS AGO
941 Shares


PHILIPPINES-GREATEST-MISTAKE-ABOUT-CHINA.jpg

Four years ago, the Philippines made a very unconventional gamble: It decided to abandon its traditional allies and made a very publicized pivot to China.
Read more

For many observers, the move was initially seen as a masterstroke: Leveraging the rivalry between the two superpowers, the Philippines was suddenly in the international spotlight, as the U.S. attempted to win it back with soft power. But America’s oldest Asian ally had decidedly fallen out of its orbit and into its rival’s arms.

In the last four years, the Philippines has kowtowed to China in the face of issues surrounding the West Philippine Sea. Little has been done to assert the country’s sovereign rights in its own waters.

In 2019, the most violent incident occurred in the West Philippine Sea: A Chinese ship rammed a Filipino fishing boat in Reed Bank, a shoal within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone. The Philippines, afraid to displease China, merely shrugged off the incident. “I’m sorry but that’s how it is,” President Rodrigo Duterte told the Filipino fishermen, who were rescued not by China or the Philippine Coast Guard, but by Vietnamese fishermen who witnessed the attack.

china-philippines-relations.jpg

A Chinese Coast Guard Ship

Throughout his presidency, Duterte has made four trips to China, the latest was in April 2019. The trips were seen as opportunities to secure investments for the Philippines. Mere months after Duterte took office, the Philippines trumpeted China’s pledges, which are now worth P1 trillion. But as Duterte nears the end of his presidency, most of China’s promises have not materialized.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Four years on, it seems the gamble has not paid off. The belief in not displeasing China in exchange for investments was an amateur mistake of someone with a poor grasp on Chinese foreign policy.

Until now, the Philippines has yet to receive the much-awaited COVID-19 vaccines from China, and has not even closed a deal with the Chinese as of this writing.

In contrast, Indonesia, which has taken a very strong stance against China on its sea disputes and even sunk a number of confiscated Chinese vessels, has already received 1.2 million initial doses of the vaccine delivered from China last week. Another 1.8 million doses are going to be delivered in January.

Where did the Philippines go wrong in its pivot to China?
“Chinese statecraft has contempt for the weak and the naive,” political analyst Richard Heydarian tells Esquire Philippines. “But China grudgingly respects those with strategic dignity and courage.”

It is ironic how the Philippines saw a significant decrease in Chinese investments in the last four years compared to the previous administration, which successfully took China to court and won.

“People forget that the past administration, which had the audacity to take China to international court and liken their imperial tendencies to those of Nazi Germany, oversaw an increase in Chinese investments,” said Heydarian. “There was no war, skirmishes, or any form of aggression after we filed the arbitration case.”

Former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario shares the same opinion. “China has continued to move forward with its unlawful agenda. Why? Because we allow them to do so,” he told CNN Philippines. Retired Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, who was one of the legal luminaries who laid the groundwork for the Philippines’ case against China, agrees. “Our problem today is that our own government simply doesn't want to displease China,” said Carpio.

Unfortunately, the Philippines burned its most valuable trump card when it decided not to enforce the 2016 ruling in favor of the Philippines. The Philippines was too eager to give up leverage without ensuring strategic reciprocity.

Why China snubbed the Philippines

PHOTO BY PCOO/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. PCOO/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
Utang na loob (debt of gratitude) is a very Filipino concept that Duterte thought would work on China. Utang na loob has been a tenet of this administration, from appointing people to key positions in government to refusing to punish erring officials.

Despite the Philippines’ trumpeted pivot to China, its undignified kowtowing did not produce as many visible results in investments or grants. The lesson, which government leaders seemed to have learned late into night, is that China does not reward favorable foreign policy toward it. It does not think in terms of utang na loob, but in terms of self-interest, like any mature state would.

"We haven't seen a single major concession from China on the West Philippine Sea. And then, China snubbed the Philippines for Indonesia, a country that has taken a much tougher stance against Beijing over maritime disputes, for the first batch of COVID-19 vaccines," said Heydarian.

The Philippines' warm approach toward China did not pay off because China did not need to bargain anything for it. We gave our leverage away for free.

More important, the Chinese Communist Party, which thinks in terms of centuries, knows this sudden shift in foreign policy is not sustainable and will likely end once Duterte steps down from office.

The Philippines has a very long history of standing up to China (while gaining from it), and this has dazzled the international community to a great extent. It is up to the next batch of leaders to correct the misguided pivot to China and assert what is just and equitable for the sake of Filipinos.

++++++++

Indonesia is a perfect case in which you could have all the benefits of having a burgeoning trade with China while not kowtowing with China when it comes to sovereignity.

Kowtowing with China just don't work.
@maverick1977
Very misleading post. In fact , indonesian restrain alot when dealing with China in SCS. They talk of sending warship to deal with Chinese CMS ship but never do it. Even at height of SCS clashed, indonesian never threaten to cancel the HSR deal or other ongoing project with Chinese companies unlike India.

Those Chinese fishing boat under indonesia coast guard are indeed caught illegal stray into indonesia water and it's indonesia law right to do whatever they want with them. While those Chinese fisher boat fish at natunas island are all protected by CMS ship. And indonesian not able to capture one of them.
 
.
Very misleading post. In fact , indonesian restrain alot when dealing with China in SCS. They talk of sending warship to deal with Chinese CMS ship but never do it. Even at height of SCS clashed, indonesian never threaten to cancel the HSR deal or other ongoing project with Chinese companies unlike India.

Those Chinese fishing boat are indeed caught illegal stray into indonesia water and it's indonesia law right to do whatever they want with them. Those Chinese fisher boat fish at natunas island are all protected by CMS ship. And indonesian not able to capture one of them.
We never threaten to cancel anything, but if there's something the Philippines could learn from us, that you don't have to be Beijing's lackey to have preferable trade. We have better trade deals with China while having a harder stance with China.

Oh yes we do send warships to deal with you, name me another ASEAN country to send their entire fleet to challenge you in the high seas.
 
Last edited:
. . .
We never threaten to cancel anything, but if there's something the Philippines could learn from us, that you don't have to be Beijing's lackey to have preferable trade. We have better trade deals with China while having a harder stance with China.

Oh yes we do send warships to deal with you, name me another ASEAN country to send their entire fleet to challenge you in the high seas.
BS article try to claim indonesia take rougher stance against China compare to Philippine. Jokowi in fact claim he never take stance against any side unlike philippine who has many defence pact with US and even host their armed forces.
We never threaten to cancel anything, but if there's something the Philippines could learn from us, that you don't have to be Beijing's lackey to have preferable trade. We have better trade deals with China while having a harder stance with China.

Oh yes we do send warships to deal with you, name me another ASEAN country to send their entire fleet to challenge you in the high seas.
Philippine under previous president who act tough against China didn't even won a single trade deal, never recovered a single islet back. Durterte at least managed to get pinoy fisherman back to scarborough bay to fish and has good economy trade with China until the covid-19 happened which the writer purposely omit it. He is more or less hire by western to write those selective argument.
 
.
BS article try to claim indonesia take rougher stance against China compare to Philippine. Jowoki in fact claim he never take stance against any side unlike philippine who has many defence pact with US and even host their armed forces.
The Philippines just realize one thing. Nobody can help them in territory disputes issue. In that year of kangaroo court, America send two aircraft carriers staying close to SCS, meanwhile China send all fleet to SCS, finally the American fleet withdrew and disappeared. The Philippines even pay several millions dollar for the kangaroo court.
 
.
Very misleading post. In fact , indonesian restrain alot when dealing with China in SCS. They talk of sending warship to deal with Chinese CMS ship but never do it. Even at height of SCS clashed, indonesian never threaten to cancel the HSR deal or other ongoing project with Chinese companies unlike India.

Those Chinese fishing boat under indonesia coast guard are indeed caught illegal stray into indonesia water and it's indonesia law right to do whatever they want with them. While those Chinese fisher boat fish at natunas island are all protected by CMS ship. And indonesian not able to capture one of them.

Also hasn't Indonesia taken a very hard line stance against Vietnam and Vietnamese poacher fishermen? I seem to remember ships colliding and sailors throwing garbage at each other. or something like that.

Vietnamese have been trying to cozy up to Japan, India and the US, in order to annoy the Chinese, right?
 
.
Also hasn't Indonesia taken a very hard line stance against Vietnam and Vietnamese poacher fishermen? I seem to remember ships colliding and sailors throwing garbage at each other. or something like that.

Vietnamese have been trying to cozy up to Japan, India and the US, in order to annoy the Chinese, right?
In fact, vietnamese has toned down a lot of their action against China. Their economy are closely tie with China.
U see, recently. They are very quiet. They also don't bother to drill any new oil field in 9 dash line. They are more keen to maintain mutual status with China now. The trade with China is worth more than a few oil field. Vietnamese coast guard realise, they can't outmatched Chinese fleet in numbers and size.

7427ea210acc17fee0da10.jpg
 
.
You must be a hardcore follower of QAnon.
LOL. You are just less informed.
Other president candidate were interviewed by US ambassador in Manila, while Duterte is the only one rejected the invitation.
US is basically running the Philippine like a colonization.
Everyone knows.
 
.
Duterte has certainly made the Philippines more independent. Being master's dog means you get fed something and given some sort of shelter. Being a free wild animal means you have to find your own food and shelter. Difficult and frightening.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom