What's new

The Looming ISIS Threat and Pakistan's state of denial

pak-marine

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
11,639
Reaction score
-22
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Looming ISIS Threat and Pakistan's state of denial
http://www.dawn.com/news/1296575/reaping-the-whirlwind
http://www.dawn.com/news/1296575/reaping-the-whirlwind

ZAHID HUSSAIN — PUBLISHED about 15 hours ago





THE targets may be different but the perpetrators of the two deadly attacks carried out in Balochistan in the space of one month are the same. The responsibility of the carnage at the shrine in Khuzdar as well as the slaughter of police cadets in Quetta have been claimed by the militant Islamic State group and its affiliates.

In August this year, militants wiped out almost an entire generation of senior lawyers in the province in a suicide bomb attack inside a hospital. The restive province seems to have become the main battleground of the militants. Some recent sectarian terrorist attacks in upper Sindh have also been traced to militant groups based in Balochistan.

It is not for the first time that a terrorist attack in Pakistan has carried the IS footprint. Last year’s bus massacre of over 40 members of the Ismaili community in Karachi was among the most gruesome of its kind. There have also been reports of security agencies busting militant cells affiliated with the group in other parts of the country. But it is Balochistan which is in the cross hairs.

Islamic State’s apparent involvement in the latest attacks shows it has gained a foothold in the region.
What is more troubling is the emerging nexus between local sectarian outfits and the lethal global jihadi group. We, however, are still in a state of denial about the looming threat. IS is not present in Pakistan; the idea is just a part of our enemies’ conspiracy to isolate the country — this is the patent response by government officials after every attack.

It may be true that the Middle Eastern jihadi group does not have a formal organisational structure in Pakistan, but over the past years it has found allies among Sunni extremist groups such as the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi (LJ) and some splinter factions of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan. What has brought them together is the strong anti-Shia bent of their jihadist ideology.

Most of these local militant groups were earlier affiliated with Al Qaeda which has lost its appeal after losing ground in Pakistan’s tribal areas and in Afghanistan. The spectacular advances of IS and its territorial control in Iraq and Syria have now made it much more attractive to militants in search of a new and more radical identity.

Although IS has now lost much of the territory under its control and is on the retreat in the Middle East, it has maintained links with its allies in Pakistan. These groups operate more like a franchise than a formal centralised structure. Hence it is not surprising that the pictures of the Quetta police academy attackers were posted on the group’s official website hours after the incident.

Some radicalised, educated young Pakistanis, influenced by its powerful online propaganda, have also pledged allegiance to IS. Quite a few were involved in attacks in Karachi and have recently been convicted by military courts. But some of these cells are still actively forming a nexus with sectarian groups, raising fears of continuing terrorist attacks across the country despite crackdowns by law-enforcement agencies. The breakdown of governance and an increasingly ineffective policing system, especially in Karachi, provide space for such groups.

However, it is the rise of sectarian militancy in Balochistan over the last few years that has provided a foothold for IS in the province. A major factor in the ascent of violent sectarian outfits is the mushrooming of foreign-funded radical madressahs in the province. Seen to be primarily financed by Gulf donors, they are largely concentrated in Mastung and Khuzdar districts, the latter being the site of the latest attack on a remote shrine.

While travelling on the RCD highway some 15 years ago, I remember seeing madressahs dotting the area where no other amenities were available. The administration either approved of them or looked the other way, boosting foreign-funded Sunni radicalisation. There is also strong evidence of a nexus between sectarian groups and the militias allegedly sponsored by the intelligence agencies to counter Baloch separatists. Such tacit support has allowed the militants to spread their tentacles.

Over the years Mastung has emerged as the main centre of sectarian militancy. There is still a madressah complex set up by anti-Shia groups operating in the region. It is serving as one of the bastions of religious extremism in the province. Dawood Badani, a relative of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was responsible for the first major sectarian terrorist attack on an imambargah in Quetta in 2004.

The trail of most of the attacks on Hazara Shias in Quetta that have claimed hundreds of innocent lives over the last decade leads to this district. Many top LJ leaders have reportedly been killed in the latest crackdown by security agencies, but the recent surge in violence indicates that sectarian networks are still capable of launching high-profile terrorist attacks. Meanwhile, Pakistani sectarian militants have also found sanctuaries in Afghanistan, allowing them to move about freely on both sides of the border and making it much harder for Pakistani law-enforcement agencies to track them down.

Just a few months ago, Pakistan’s chief military spokesman declared that IS plans to expand into the country had been thwarted. But the group’s apparent involvement in the latest attacks shows that it has gained a foothold in the region despite the crackdown.

It is not just for publicity’s sake that the banner of IS is being used by various factions of the LJ; there is strong evidence of organisational links between them. The latest wave of terrorist attacks in Balochistan appears to be part of the strategy to hit soft targets as IS suffers huge setbacks in its strongholds in the Middle East.

Surely, one must not exaggerate the IS threat, but it is also unwise to underestimate the growing influence of the group, especially given the surge in sectarian militancy and the weakened authority of the state. We are reaping the whirlwind of our misplaced policies.

The writer is an author and journalist
 
Anyone can pledge alligence to ISIS. The Lej and IMU have done that. That is a re-branding and nothing else.
They don't and won't have any real link with ISIS leadership in the ME.
 
every country has threat from ISIS including the ones who created it
The other day on CBS interview Tony Blair shamelessly admitted they created ISIS to create problem for Saddam Hussain and further Shamelessly said but ISIS was leter defeated in Iraq and That we have to fight this mindset of fundamentalism in Muslim countries...shame has no Low
 
Same shit different label. ISIS as we know it doesn't exist in Pakistan.
 
Anyone can pledge alligence to ISIS. The Lej and IMU have done that. That is a re-branding and nothing else.
They don't and won't have any real link with ISIS leadership in the ME.
the writer thinks other wise and claims there are strong ties / links btw these militants , he also says it will be unwise to underestimate the threat
 
the writer thinks other wise and claims there are strong ties / links btw these militants , he also says it will be unwise to underestimate the threat
My opinion is different. These groups were already killing Pakistanis, now they've pledged their allegiance to ISIS. This changes....almost nothing....they'll continue killing Pakistanis and will maybe get a pat on their back from those in Iraq and Syria.

They won't get any financial, military or advisory support from ISIS as those are much needed in Iraq where they're under pressure.
 
Same people different name. We are not in a state of denial we're on a slow and effective hunt till the last one is alive.
 
the writer thinks other wise and claims there are strong ties / links btw these militants , he also says it will be unwise to underestimate the threat

No one is Undermining anything , ISIS and other banned Organization been hunted as we talk here .. they are on run and looking for soft targets , this is best way to recruit more Jihadist to show that ISIS is established their Caliphate in Pakistan blah blah .. Even MQM tomorrow can pledge with ISIS , that does not mean anything , its just " Old Wine in New Bottle "
 
No one is Undermining anything , ISIS and other banned Organization been hunted as we talk here .. they are on run and looking for soft targets , this is best way to recruit more Jihadist to show that ISIS is established their Caliphate in Pakistan blah blah .. Even MQM tomorrow can pledge with ISIS , that does not mean anything , its just " Old Wine in New Bottle "

many in pakistan's hippocrat society are not concerned as they are not directly targeted because of their beliefs /sect .. they try and give different colors to any event call it a raws conspiracy and all sorts of stupid fcking garbage they can pull out from their chuddies only when the snakes & rats bite them in their arse than they realize .. wtf .. so carry on believing your old bottle & new chaddi theory ..
 
Pakistan have seen/rides/dealt more lethal organization then ISIS in past decades; No matter what ISIS impact in the longer run would be minimum.
 
every country has threat from ISIS including the ones who created it
The other day on CBS interview Tony Blair shamelessly admitted they created ISIS to create problem for Saddam Hussain and further Shamelessly said but ISIS was leter defeated in Iraq and That we have to fight this mindset of fundamentalism in Muslim countries...shame has no Low

You are an elite member in PDF, and don't you feel ashamed to twist facts ?? What did Tony Blair actually said ??

"without the Iraq war there would be no Islamic State (Isis)."

This is exactly what he told. He never told that U.S, U.K or NATO created them. :(
 
You are an elite member in PDF, and don't you feel ashamed to twist facts ?? What did Tony Blair actually said ??

"without the Iraq war there would be no Islamic State (Isis)."

This is exactly what he told. He never told that U.S, U.K or NATO created them. :(

Did you watch the interview he gave to Peter Manbridge on CBC or you just blabbering, Being Indian doesnt mean you have speak out in favor of anyone doing anti-muslim acts even if you have to speak from your ***
 
TTP members changed their name to ISIS in Afghanistan. Same people same horrific crimes same ideology, different name.
 
Did you watch the interview he gave to Peter Manbridge on CBC or you just blabbering, Being Indian doesnt mean you have speak out in favor of anyone doing anti-muslim acts even if you have to speak from your ***


This is what you are talking about right ?? Yes I did saw that. Mr. Peter Manbridge tried to put word's in Mr. Blair's mouth. What did he asked ?? He was mentioning about the alleged claim made by Mr. Trump during his election campaign. Now can you enlighten me where in this above mentioned interview does Mr. Blair accept that they created ISIS ??

Sorry sir, I'm never anti-muslim and I'm really proud to be friends with some really good Muslims.

I'm also proud to represent a country who had never thought twice or even debated while making a Mulsim as our president in the past, nor did we hesitated to appoint great Muslims in key posts such as our IB chief (former) or permanent UN representative (Incumbent) that too in a country predominantly Hindu. I guess it will be hard to digest for you. :)
 

Back
Top Bottom