Koovie
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,288
- Reaction score
- 6
Either you are an ignorant fool and arguing about something you know very little, or trying to play the devil's advocate..
There are laws against such activities in civilized societies, provided one chooses to exercise those provisions. Freedom of speech does not come without clauses to maintain civility, for without that it will be complete anarchy.Quoting a few :
BS. For the millionth time, I dont give a **** about your interpretation out of an old book if you wanna stop me from saying what I want. Its simple as that.
Tell me, why should I not be able to criticize someone who used violence to spread his religious views? Somebody who used jihad to achieve his aim!?
Now you wanna tell that I am not allowed to do so because some stone age people might get offended by it?
And how is this defamation? Is drawing a cartoon of somebody defamation in the US? Did Obama sue anyone for depicting him in ridiculous poses? Did the pope do it? Or did the thousands of others do it who appeared in cartoons?
The critics are attacking their beliefs, their customs, Muahamds actions etc and are not degrading a certain group as racists would do it.
No... we only see a bunch of sad fundamentalists going nuts about such things... people who do not understand our way of thinking.
And I deliberately ignored the Indian law here... you cant compare it to a developed nation anyways. You wont have misguided mobs of religiously motivated braindead fundamentalists hacking at each other with knifes and similar things.