That is not a response, it is a classic logical fallacy: responding to criticism with criticism.
Would he have gone out of his way to imitate an accent in the condition he was in? He was giving up everything else, but he still had the conscience to imitate an accent?
Are you denying that the incident happened or that it was significant enough to cause a problem?
When incidents like these happen in Pakistan, everyone jumps with theories about how the fully country and the military was involved because they didn't kill the terrorists in five seconds like Indian forces would'e done. Sure, there's no doubt it was difficult, but the point questions the
ability and
narrative of the forces, not their intent.
The political benefit remained, regardless of who won in the elections. And BJP won now, so you can chalk it up to the long term effects of the gradual change of political mindset in India.
If a Lashkar e Tayiba exists, it's not Hafeez Saeed that leads it. That's what he meant to say.
Since when did the Times of India become Pakistani?
Dead, jailed terrorists still CBI's most wanted - The Times of India
The sources were true enough for your media and several politicians to pay heed.
RSS & 26/11: Digvijaya flags it off again, this time in Mumbai - Indian Express
Most 'Islamic' attackers do try to present themselves in that way : look at the Paris shooters and Sydney hostage taker. But the point is that 'extremist Muslims' wouldn't go drink alcohol in a bar, even if they wanted to 'unobtrusively sneak in'.
It seems to be pretty effective at blowing up random boats it doesn't like the look of. Same point about ability and narrative of the forces, as before. You people keep parroting criticisms of our forces, why so defensive when we criticise yours?
''Chaotic situation'' doesn't mean ignore every discrepancy in the story.
The point is about VoIP and identification, not visas and passports.
ISI is a super evil and super competent demonic organization whose agents never sleep and spend their time mind controlling pigeons when the idea fits India's narrative, but then suddenly they're so incompetent (when it fits the narrative of course).
Your sarcasm and occasional strawmen show the opposite of what you're trying to show here.
Made for interestingly humorous discussion.
And we have better things to do than prove that the sun rising from the East isn't a Pakistani conspiracy.
What about it? Correct meaning is struggle. Contemporary usage among normal Muslims is still the same. It's not uncommon to hear stuff like 'this is our Jihad' in reference to normal stuff like praying in difficult conditions or charity work etc.
Only misguided non-Muslims and extremist Muslims consider Jihad to just be 'War'.
Not. I cited* a group of Pakistani journalists (Daily Mail is not a Pakistani paper. It's British.) who claim they went to Kasab's village and identified his family.
I'm not arguing that Kasab is not Pakistani. He could've been. I'm challenging both sides' stories, just for the sake of getting a clearer picture. But obviously it shouldn't be expected when Indians and their defensive outbursts are involved.
So you mean to say that the terrorists don't know that the people in the mosques they bomb are Muslim? Didn't they know that the students of APS were Muslim? Don't they know that all the Syrians and Iraqis they regularly massacre are Muslim?
What a nonsensical argument.
First it's Indians shouting about Pakistanis being conspiracy theorists, then we have such bull coming from the same side.
Firstly, the school was a military school. The children there were mostly the children of PA and ISI themselves. We don't need any 'sympathy from world'. PA was doing its job perfectly without any of the world's sympathy. Their 'sympathy' has done enough, they dragged us into the 'War on Terror' in the first place.
The Taliban lost their public support years ago. They couldn't care less about public support in Pakistan, they have enough recruits in the tribal areas and Afghanistan. This was, according to the Taliban themselves, a desperate revenge attack to demoralize the PA by attacking their children.
As for military courts, they could have been established without such an attack. Majority would have supported it anyways. But then we'd have people like you shouting about how ''rogue'' PA is, but we have that anyways don't we.
PA and ISI are not ''rogue''. The whole of Pakistan supports them, especially the 'moderate and innocent' citizens. So if you want to make the whole of Pakistan ''pay'', just come out and say it, no need to sugar-coat it with nonsense like that.
One thing that seems to be very unclear for most people is the simple fact that both India and Pakistan are involved in proxy warfare. That fact alone would clear up most of the confused and misguided opinions around here.
