Taiwan will become the first country in Asia to recognize Gay Marriage

[VALKRYIE]

Taiwan Could Be The First Country In Asia To Have Marriage Equality

July 24, 2015

Dan Avery

Weeks after marriage equality came to the U.S, legislators in Taiwan are drafting a new same-s*x partnership law, LGBT site Fridae reports.

If it passes, it could create a road map for Taiwan to become the first country in Asia to recognize marriage equality

Both of Taiwan’s major political parties support the measure, with DPP chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen saying same-s**x marriage upholds human rights, and Hung Hsiu-chu, deputy head of the KMT, stating she maintains an “open and optimistic” attitude toward the LGBT community.

While attitudes about sexual expression are conservative, Taiwan is one of the most gay-friendly countries in the region: A 2013 poll showed 53% of Taiwanese people support marriage equality.

The exact details of the bill have yet to be released, though, and LGBT advocates are concerned it will create a separate-but-equal divide between gay and straight couples.

“The fact that the government decided to set a new same-s**x partnership law discriminates against homosexuals and it shows that homos**xual couples are different from heteros**xuals,” activist Chen Ling told The Global Times

Chen and her partner, Lu Hsin-chieh, tried to get married in Taiwan last year but were unsuccessful.

Taiwan Could Be The First Country In Asia To Have Marriage Equality | NewNowNext

 

[Aepsilons]

Well the civil rights practice in Taiwan is actually one of the best in the region. Taiwan is a Liberal Democracy, centered in the rule of law. Anyways, we shouldn't persecute people based on their sexual preference; so long as they obey the laws and pay taxes.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

This is yet another cultural revolution and it will turn very ugly.

There will be around 10% of Taiwanese become vector of diereses. HIV is predominantly a gay disease. The cases of asxhole breaking up will hike dramatically and Taiwanese having free healthcare need pay more tax to stitch these asxhole back to shape.

The "no boy no girl" in all studies shows a very significant domestic violence, depression compared to straight couples.and I expect more people checking in to mental hospital.

 

[Aepsilons]

This is yet another cultural revolution and it will turn very ugly.

There will be around 10% of Taiwanese become vector of diereses. HIV is predominantly a gay disease. The cases of asxhole breaking up will hike dramatically and Taiwanese having free healthcare need pay more tax to stitch these asxhole back to shape.

The "no boy no girl" in all studies shows a very significant domestic violence, depression compared to straight couples.and I expect more people checking in to mental hospital.

That's really quite harsh, Lux. I happen to have friends who are gay and they are in no way fit your description. If the law is to be passed in Taiwan then it would secure marriage perks , particularly economic benefits that usually are afforded for marriage couples, one example would be filing taxes , marriage tax discounts. You don't have to be gay to appreciate that people should be afforded the same rights as other people that are in the majority.

The "no boy no girl" in all studies shows a very significant domestic violence, depression compared to straight couples.and I expect more people checking in to mental hospital.

Do you happen to understand the complications of psychological bullying ? Do you understand that there are youth that may happen to be gay and are bullied outrightly in schools? Do you understand that this is the cause of high suicide rates in gay and lesbian youths? I am actually in support of counseling services for people , especially for the youth , for a host of reasons. This is not something you should just joke about --- be open minded. You don't have to be gay to understand the error in bullying behavior; and the importance of protecting people from harmful toxic condoned abuses.

Please be more considerate, buddy.

 

[Lux de Veritas]

That's really quite harsh, Lux. I happen to have friends who are gay and they are in no way fit your description. If the law is to be passed in Taiwan then it would secure marriage perks , particularly economic benefits that usually are afforded for marriage couples, one example would be filing taxes , marriage tax discounts. You don't have to be gay to appreciate that people should be afforded the same rights as other people that are in the majority.

You are taking your friends and I am taking in general and statistic from research paper.

The gay can fuc themselves in private and no on cares and no one harass them in Taiwan. But these people are really parasitic if society allows more room.

We know gay lied and lied about HIV being a straight diesease because gay figure out that everyone will think God punish them, if people figure out that HIV strike only gay.

Indeed.

And I got a suspicious that women got HIV from their husband because these husband are actually Bi.

There are a lot of toxic of gay culture. I may write them if I have chance,

 

[Aepsilons]

You are taking your friends and I am taking in general and statistic from research paper.

The gay can fuc themselves in private and no on cares and no one harass them in Taiwan. But these people are really parasitic if society allows more room.

We know gay lied and lied about HIV being a straight diesease because gay figure out that everyone will think God punish them, if people figure out that HIV strike only gay.

Indeed.

And I got a suspicious that women got HIV from their husband because these husband are actually Bi.

There are a lot of toxic of gay culture. I may write them if I have chance,

Well you point out valid points, especially about the transmission of HIV in certain population groups. I'm not arguing about the 'error' or 'right' of gay behavior, that's up to them. All I'm saying is that it makes sense to streamline tax-related benefits and / or economic-related benefits regarding partners (heterosexual/ homosexual).

You're arguing from the sexual transmission / social perception vantage point; I'm talking about the economics of marriage.

Given, you do have valid point(s). I don't disagree with you on those points.


Regards,

 

[Lux de Veritas]

Well you point out valid points, especially about the transmission of HIV in certain population groups. I'm not arguing about the 'error' or 'right' of gay behavior, that's up to them. All I'm saying is that it makes sense to streamline tax-related benefits and / or economic-related benefits regarding partners (heterosexual/ homosexual).

You're arguing from the sexual transmission / social perception vantage point; I'm talking about the economics of marriage.

Given, you do have valid point(s). I don't disagree with you on those points.


Regards,

Also gay like to lie, lying about a binary fallacy that everyone is either congenital gay or straight. So people must pity gay because they got it from God.

Few people 100% gay or 100% straight

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual

The above is most likely the case. And there is strong evidence that some weak heterosexual are converted to gay through childhood experience.

Giving a society more gay culture will also make those happily bisexual more opportunity to fuc man and become a menace to the health of their wives.

Also gay are far far far more promiscuous than straight women. Anyone who get conscript to army know that. Gay is always shamelessly looking to seduce man.

 

[TheTruth]

. The cases of asxhole breaking up will hike dramatically .

Changing marriage laws won't change that, Lux.

 

[Providence]

Also gay like to lie, lying about a binary fallacy that everyone is either congenital gay or straight. So people must pity gay because they got it from God.

Few people 100% gay or 100% straight

100-0: Maximum heterosexual, minimum homosexual
90-10: Maximum heterosexual, incidental homosexual
80-20: Maximum heterosexual, significant homosexual
70-30: Maximum heterosexual, strong homosexual
60-40: Maximum heterosexual, very strong strong homosexual
50-50: Maximum heterosexual, maximal homosexual
40-60: Maximum homosexual, very strong heterosexual
30-70: Maximum homosexual, strong heterosexual
20-80: Maximum homosexual, significant heterosexual
10-90: Maximum homosexual, incidental heterosexual
0-100: Maximum homosexual, minimal heterosexual

The above is most likely the case. And there is strong evidence that some weak heterosexual are converted to gay through childhood experience.

Giving a society more gay culture will also make those happily bisexual more opportunity to fuc man and become a menace to the health of their wives.

Also gay are far far far more promiscuous than straight women. Anyone who get conscript to army know that. Gay is always shamelessly looking to seduce man.

Can I have a link to the "research paper" you are quoting ?

 

[Lux de Veritas]

Can I have a link to the "research paper" you are quoting ?

Truth is straight has to fuckk 8000 HIV women to get HIV, statistically. For speaking the truth, the gay bash Dr Padian like nobody, and she has to apologize many times to save her asx.

So how does HIV get transmitted? The answer is due to gay fuccking backside causing rupture.

Dirty gay is literally and figuratively a dirty scummbag, a mobile diseases vector, a time bomb.

Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. - PubMed - NCBI

Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals | Psych Central

 

[大汉奸柳传志]

Advocating gay rights is considered as changing the status quo and will be met with our Zubrs.

 

[Aepsilons]

Truth is straight has to fuckk 8000 HIV women to get HIV, statistically. For speaking the truth, the gay bash Dr Padian like nobody, and she has to apologize many times to save her asx.

So how does HIV get transmitted? The answer is due to gay fuccking backside causing rupture.

Dirty gay is literally and figuratively a dirty scummbag, a mobile diseases vector, a time bomb.

Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. - PubMed - NCBI

Higher Risk of Mental Health Problems for Homosexuals | Psych Central

Again, thanks for the data. Valid points again.

 

[Maxtini]

Again, thanks for the data. Valid points again.

No~ the point is not valid. Lux de Veritas misrepresented and misintrepreted the number 0.01-0.38% of transmission rate into "the number is so low, it's not heteresexual transmitted disease. It's homosexual transmitted disease

This is not valid conclusion as comparatively speaking anal intercourse would also have "low" transmission rate of 0.03% (without condom). Both heterosexual and homosexual interaction have chances to spread HIV disease in significant way. Just multiply the rate with the current population and it translates into significantly large numbers.

Blaming certain subgroup of population for spreading certain disease is disgusting! Lux de Veritas is the one who is "scumbbag".

It's like blaming black people for spreading ebola.

 

[Aepsilons]

No~ the point is not valid. Lux de Veritas misrepresented and misintrepreted the number 0.01-0.38% of transmission rate into "the number is so low, it's not heteresexual transmitted disease. It's homosexual transmitted disease

This is not valid conclusion as comparatively speaking anal intercourse would also have "low" transmission rate of 0.03% (without condom). Both heterosexual and homosexual interaction have chances to spread HIV disease in significant way. Just multiply the rate with the current population and it translates into significantly large numbers.

Blaming certain subgroup of population for spreading certain disease is disgusting! Lux de Veritas is the one who is "scumbbag".

It's like blaming black people for spreading ebola.

He is citing one academic source, which does some what support his (Lux's) hypothesis (tho the way he presents his hypothesis is very disrespectful, the verbiage is very poor taste, imho).

Perhaps we can find more quantitative data from other research findings that can contest ? Or even find data that may even support.

 

[powastick]

I have nothing against homosexuals, they can do their thing, I don't care as they don't involve me. Gay marriage? No way, I won't support.