What's new

Syria says Russian missile defence system ‘ineffective’

.
Of course S-300 is ineffective against Israeli cruise missiles. Ground radars cant even see low flying objects except in near proximity. What is special about that? What a way of making sensation quoting well known BS site LOL
 
.
Of course S-300 is ineffective against Israeli cruise missiles. Ground radars cant even see low flying objects except in near proximity. What is special about that? What a way of making sensation quoting well known BS site LOL
Yes but the BS article says the Chinese ground radars can (despite the earth's curvature)..While the only best solution to see low flying fast missiles or airplanes from a distance are AWACS..
 
.
You need to look on this for better assessment of Russian true capability.

Really? I see nothing to prove anything.

The Russian air defense system is very good. The most important factor is still its user.
Nonsense. We buy S-400 just to balance trade deficiency. And many of our S-300 needed Chinese upgrade to be potent.
 
. . .
Air defense system is not just the system itself.Can personnel perform at 100% of weapon system capability?Or develop new tactics, even tactics that the manufacturer has not thought of. If only the basic operation of the equipment itself, then it is estimated that 50% of the performance of the equipment can not play out.
The AK47 in the hands of ordinary people and the AK in the hand of special forces are two different guns.
 
. .
Air defense system is not just the system itself.Can personnel perform at 100% of weapon system capability?Or develop new tactics, even tactics that the manufacturer has not thought of. If only the basic operation of the equipment itself, then it is estimated that 50% of the performance of the equipment can not play out.
The AK47 in the hands of ordinary people and the AK in the hand of special forces are two different guns.
Well said
 
.
son, that's not how you spell coffeeeeee :coffee:
Another cope

Air defense system is not just the system itself.Can personnel perform at 100% of weapon system capability?Or develop new tactics, even tactics that the manufacturer has not thought of. If only the basic operation of the equipment itself, then it is estimated that 50% of the performance of the equipment can not play out.
The AK47 in the hands of ordinary people and the AK in the hand of special forces are two different guns.
An AK47 isn't an S-300, air defense systems are supposed to be easy to use, with limited training needed, that's why it only took a few months to train the Syrians.

facts will remain fact either chosen filth agree or not . spyder system fail to intercept PAF plane and instead shot down indian mi17:) .
Coping so hard
 
.
An AK47 isn't an S-300, air defense systems are supposed to be easy to use, with limited training needed, that's why it only took a few months to train the Syrians.
Can you please stop s.hit posting ?
 
.
Another cope


An AK47 isn't an S-300, air defense systems are supposed to be easy to use, with limited training needed, that's why it only took a few months to train the Syrians.


Coping so hard
beny is in copi...copi cabana :bunny:
 
.
The problem I think is putin is a double gamer. You know for usa when you have both black and white pieces on the chessboard you always win. Last time he did nothing almost approved during and after the usa drone murders of Iranian genaral. Maybe it was calculated with usa that Iran would be out of the chessboard after this event. He is somewhat more inclined to the usa side when you analyse conflicts around the globe.

Old habits from being a kgb operative I suppose. putin certainly knew what was about to happen with Turkey. Russia didnt pressure enough to slow down operations in Idlib maybe even allowed it escalate without telling the risks. It was evident that a possible refugee crisis from Idlib operations for Turkey means chain of reactions that cannot be controlled and a very possible-legitimate enough reason of operations against Syria. Yes they can root out the hts out of idlib but it should have been done in a controlled manner. At least they had to intelligently solve out the refugee crisis possibility and explain it to all parties including Turkey before starting the operations.

At least now there is a temporary settle down of issues there and no need to get angry again especially the pyd usa paid guys are posing as good guys demanding fedaration and stuff from Syria which would start another worse chain of reactions for Iraq Turkey and Iran as well in the region.

Also I believe the target selections generally in Idlib was made purposefully by Russia and given to Syrians who dont question the validity of targets which are actually mostly civilian targets. This way after the war Syria can be blamed easily.

But what are the alternatives. Iranian air defence systems seem not to be capable enough. Maybe short range systems can be transferred against israeli cruise missiles and stuff. But after the conflict with Turkey Iran needs to ensure that they wont be used against Turkey and Syria will act in a very controlled manner especially in Idlib. Also they need to not alienate Russia while doing that. The problem is with top guys like putin not Russia.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom