What's new

Sweden says it built a Russian fighter jet killer — and stealth is totally irrelevant

A.P. Richelieu

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
7,724
Reaction score
4
Country
Sweden
Location
Sweden
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/...er-and-stealth-is-irrelevant-2019-2?r=US&IR=T

Sweden says it built a Russian fighter jet killer — and stealth is totally irrelevant

upload_2019-2-8_23-6-14.jpeg


Sweden's Saab Gripen in flight.
Oleg V. Belyakov - AirTeamImages
  • Sweden's Air Force says its Gripen E fighter jets are designed to kill Russia's fearsome Sukhoi fighter jets, and that they have a "black belt" in that type of combat.
  • The Gripen E can't carry the most weapons, has no real stealth, isn't the longest-range, fastest, or even cheapest jet, but has a massive and respected electronic warfare capability.
  • The Gripen E is Sweden's cheap solution to killing Russia's fighter jets and surface-to-air missiles, and Russia probably can't do much about it.
The commander of Sweden's air force, Mats Helgesson, recently made the bold statement that his country's Saab Gripen E fighter could beat Russia's formidable fleet of Sukhoi jets with none of the expensive stealth technology the US relies on.

"Gripen, especially the E-model, is designed to kill Sukhois. There we have a black belt," Helgesson told Yle.fi at a presentation in Finland, where Sweden is trying to export the jets.

Russia's Sukhoi fighters have achieved a kind of legendary status for their ability to out-maneuver US fighter jets in dogfights and pull off dangerous and aggressive stunts in the air, but Gripen may have cracked the code.

The Gripen can't carry the most weapons, has no real stealth, isn't the longest-range, fastest, or even cheapest jet, but it has a singular focus that makes it a nightmare for Russia's fighter jets.


Justin Bronk, an aerial combat expert at the Royal United Services Institute, told Business Insider that like the A-10 Warthog was built around a massive cannon, the Gripen was built around electronic warfare.

Virtually all modern jets conduct some degree of electronic warfare, but according to Bronk, the Gripen E stands above the rest.

upload_2019-2-8_23-6-48.jpeg


Montage showing the different phases of an acrobatic maneuver performed by a Sukhoi Su-35 piloted by Sergey Bogdan at the 2013 Paris Air Show.
M0tty via Wikimedia Commons
Gripen pilots don't like to show their cards by demonstrating the full power of the jet's jamming in training, but according to Bronk, the one time they did, it completely reversed the course of the mock battle in training.

"Several years ago the Gripen pilots got tired of being made fun of by German Typhoon pilots and came to play with their wartime electronic warfare and gave them a hell of a hard time," said Bronk. One of the Gripens was "reportedly able to appear on the left wing of a Typhoon without being detected" by using its "extremely respected" jamming ability, said Bronk.

"It would be fair to assume the Gripen is one of the most capable electronic warfighters out there," he went on, adding that the Gripens that baffled the Typhoons were of the C/D series, which have much less powerful electronic warfare capabilities than the E series Gripens Helgesson described.

Who needs stealth?

upload_2019-2-8_23-7-29.jpeg


The Gripen E series fully armed.
Saab
To defeat Russia's fearsome fighters and surface-to-air missiles, the US has largely turned to stealth aircraft. Stealth costs a fortune and must be built into the shape of the plane.

If Russia somehow cracks the code of detecting stealth-shaped fighters, the US's F-35, the most expensive weapons system in history, is cooked.

Read more: A US Air Force F-16 painted like Russia's Su-57 could give the US a major combat advantage

But Saab took a different, and cheaper, approach to combating Russia's fighters and missiles by focusing on electronic attack, which gives them an advantage over stealth as they can evolve the software without a ground-up rebuild, according to Bronk.

upload_2019-2-8_23-7-59.jpeg


2016 map showing Russian air defense deployments.
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty

Saab plans to update the software on the Gripen E every two years, giving it more flexibility to meet evolving challenges, according to Bronk.

But, "the problem with basing a survival strategy around an electronic warfare suite is you don't really know if it's going to work," he said. "Even if it does, it's going to be a constant battle between your adversary and you" to get the edge on the enemy fighters as wave forms and methods of attack continuously change.

However, Sweden benefits from a Russian focus on US fighters. "Sweden is too small really to optimize your counter-electronic warfare capabilities against," said Bronk.

Read more: F-35s train in air-combat 'beast mode' in the Pacific after China deploys 'carrier-killer' missiles

If war broke out between Russia and the West, Russia would likely try hardest to push back on US electronic warfare rather than against Sweden's Gripen Es, which there would only be a few dozen of.

Flankers beware
upload_2019-2-8_23-8-56.jpeg


An armed Russian Flanker.
Screenshot/

The whole concept of the Gripen E is to "operate in Swedish territory, take advantage of all sorts of uneven terrain under cover of friendly surface-to-air missiles with a superb EW suite which should in theory keep it safe from the majority of Russian missiles and air to air threats," said Bronk.

Additionally, the Gripen E can fire almost any missile made in the US or Europe.

"If you couple a very effective radar with excellent EW and a Meteor, the most effective longest range air-to-air missile which is resistant against [Russia's] jammers... There's no reason not to assume it wouldn't be pretty damn effective," said Bronk. "If you're a flanker pilot, it's probably a very scary thing to face."
 
. .
Hi,

So true---. One who rules the electronic waves---rules the roost---.
https://nordic.businessinsider.com/...er-and-stealth-is-irrelevant-2019-2?r=US&IR=T

Sweden says it built a Russian fighter jet killer — and stealth is totally irrelevant

View attachment 537872

Sweden's Saab Gripen in flight.
Oleg V. Belyakov - AirTeamImages
  • Sweden's Air Force says its Gripen E fighter jets are designed to kill Russia's fearsome Sukhoi fighter jets, and that they have a "black belt" in that type of combat.
  • The Gripen E can't carry the most weapons, has no real stealth, isn't the longest-range, fastest, or even cheapest jet, but has a massive and respected electronic warfare capability.
  • The Gripen E is Sweden's cheap solution to killing Russia's fighter jets and surface-to-air missiles, and Russia probably can't do much about it.
The commander of Sweden's air force, Mats Helgesson, recently made the bold statement that his country's Saab Gripen E fighter could beat Russia's formidable fleet of Sukhoi jets with none of the expensive stealth technology the US relies on.

"Gripen, especially the E-model, is designed to kill Sukhois. There we have a black belt," Helgesson told Yle.fi at a presentation in Finland, where Sweden is trying to export the jets.

Russia's Sukhoi fighters have achieved a kind of legendary status for their ability to out-maneuver US fighter jets in dogfights and pull off dangerous and aggressive stunts in the air, but Gripen may have cracked the code.

The Gripen can't carry the most weapons, has no real stealth, isn't the longest-range, fastest, or even cheapest jet, but it has a singular focus that makes it a nightmare for Russia's fighter jets.


Justin Bronk, an aerial combat expert at the Royal United Services Institute, told Business Insider that like the A-10 Warthog was built around a massive cannon, the Gripen was built around electronic warfare.

Virtually all modern jets conduct some degree of electronic warfare, but according to Bronk, the Gripen E stands above the rest.

View attachment 537873

Montage showing the different phases of an acrobatic maneuver performed by a Sukhoi Su-35 piloted by Sergey Bogdan at the 2013 Paris Air Show.
M0tty via Wikimedia Commons
Gripen pilots don't like to show their cards by demonstrating the full power of the jet's jamming in training, but according to Bronk, the one time they did, it completely reversed the course of the mock battle in training.

"Several years ago the Gripen pilots got tired of being made fun of by German Typhoon pilots and came to play with their wartime electronic warfare and gave them a hell of a hard time," said Bronk. One of the Gripens was "reportedly able to appear on the left wing of a Typhoon without being detected" by using its "extremely respected" jamming ability, said Bronk.

"It would be fair to assume the Gripen is one of the most capable electronic warfighters out there," he went on, adding that the Gripens that baffled the Typhoons were of the C/D series, which have much less powerful electronic warfare capabilities than the E series Gripens Helgesson described.

Who needs stealth?

View attachment 537874

The Gripen E series fully armed.
Saab
To defeat Russia's fearsome fighters and surface-to-air missiles, the US has largely turned to stealth aircraft. Stealth costs a fortune and must be built into the shape of the plane.

If Russia somehow cracks the code of detecting stealth-shaped fighters, the US's F-35, the most expensive weapons system in history, is cooked.

Read more: A US Air Force F-16 painted like Russia's Su-57 could give the US a major combat advantage

But Saab took a different, and cheaper, approach to combating Russia's fighters and missiles by focusing on electronic attack, which gives them an advantage over stealth as they can evolve the software without a ground-up rebuild, according to Bronk.

View attachment 537875

2016 map showing Russian air defense deployments.
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty

Saab plans to update the software on the Gripen E every two years, giving it more flexibility to meet evolving challenges, according to Bronk.

But, "the problem with basing a survival strategy around an electronic warfare suite is you don't really know if it's going to work," he said. "Even if it does, it's going to be a constant battle between your adversary and you" to get the edge on the enemy fighters as wave forms and methods of attack continuously change.

However, Sweden benefits from a Russian focus on US fighters. "Sweden is too small really to optimize your counter-electronic warfare capabilities against," said Bronk.

Read more: F-35s train in air-combat 'beast mode' in the Pacific after China deploys 'carrier-killer' missiles

If war broke out between Russia and the West, Russia would likely try hardest to push back on US electronic warfare rather than against Sweden's Gripen Es, which there would only be a few dozen of.

Flankers beware
View attachment 537876

An armed Russian Flanker.
Screenshot/

The whole concept of the Gripen E is to "operate in Swedish territory, take advantage of all sorts of uneven terrain under cover of friendly surface-to-air missiles with a superb EW suite which should in theory keep it safe from the majority of Russian missiles and air to air threats," said Bronk.

Additionally, the Gripen E can fire almost any missile made in the US or Europe.

"If you couple a very effective radar with excellent EW and a Meteor, the most effective longest range air-to-air missile which is resistant against [Russia's] jammers... There's no reason not to assume it wouldn't be pretty damn effective," said Bronk. "If you're a flanker pilot, it's probably a very scary thing to face."
iran also claim it build an everything is killer

did nt expect such BS from the Swedish but hey they are desperate to fight off the f35..as it stands the NG has no hope in front of f35..f35 is both cheaper and far far superior than anything remote that NG has to offer,
the gripen is already obsolete, its a generation behind the F35..
 
. . .
iran also claim it build an everything is killer

did nt expect such BS from the Swedish but hey they are desperate to fight off the f35..as it stands the NG has no hope in front of f35..f35 is both cheaper and far far superior than anything remote that NG has to offer,
the gripen is already obsolete, its a generation behind the F35..

Hi,

Come on please---. Iran's claims cannot be matched to those of Sweden's---. There is a difference of day and night---.

Flankers an Fulcrums has very big to big RCS receptively and whereas Gripen has low RCS even with weapons with 4 AIM-120 AMRAAM Flankers and Fulcrums story is over easily @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:

Hi,

It is primarily the EW package that the russians would possibly not be able to compete against---.
 
.
Marketing article.. nothing more:

- How did Sweden get its black-belt.. did they confront the SU-35 in real situations..
- The electronics they are talking about are networked air combat systems.. but so are the Russians doing now with the latest Su-35 and Mig-35..
- Comparing to the F-35 unveiled their marketing scheme clearly..
 
.
China should build AI UAVs that can't be 'jammed', has its own independent GPS. Program the device and let it go.
 
Last edited:
.
Sweden realizes electronic warfare is superior to stealth. Any SAM can destroy a stealth fighter at very long range. Stealth is good for defensive purposes on own turf. Strike capabilities is lacking.

What Sweden failed to mention is the Russian have all electronic warfare the Swedes have and then some more.
 
.
Sweden realizes electronic warfare is superior to stealth. Any SAM can destroy a stealth fighter at very long range. Stealth is good for defensive purposes on own turf. Strike capabilities is lacking.

What Sweden failed to mention is the Russian have all electronic warfare the Swedes have and then some more.

Hi,

I doubt the russian ability very much---You statement is not correct---"not any sam can destroy a stealth fighter at very long range---".

First of all---stealth is not visible at very long ranges---secondly---it is next to impossible to get a lock on it---.
 
.
"Black belt" :lol: This thread is just a copy paste advertisement for Saab jets (coming from a swede at that). Useless waste of bandwidth. I hope they paid him for his trouble.
 
.
they can only jam a jet if they are able to detect it but sweden gripen lack capability to detect stealth fighter jets
 
.
Sweden says it built a Russian fighter jet killer — and stealth is totally irrelevant.

It seems that the "West" has a fatal flaw in their supposed technological edge. Claims to stealth have been so high, the Zionist-America bet the ranch on it. Then a small nation (Serbia) manage to shoot down not just any American air force aircraft, the F-117 Knighthawk, their most advance aircraft in the 1990s, was shot down with old tech radar, Serbian enginuity and Cold War Era Surface-to-Air Missile. The same attitude was exhibited with claims of ABM Systems (Anti-Ballistic Missile). Where the Zionist-Americans double-down on their shield with deployments in Japan, Romania, Poland, Alaska, Hawaii. In response, the Russian Federation developed super weapons designed to outmatch, out-class and out-smart the Zionist-American ABM System. If anyone remembers the Cold War, this was the case in every decade, between the Soviets, Zionist-America, Britain and France. Each trying to out do the other. Yet technologically they were out matched by one and the same by another.

The point I am trying to make is that the problem isn't technology, rather those nations who use "threat" as a means to justify their need for weapons. This diseased mentality stems at the ones whose ambitions have always been conquest and domination. This is inherent in colonial powers of the 17th-18th centuries. Such mentality seems to not have dissipated at all, rather evolved and refined it's "modus operandi" to broadly carry on with the same objectives. Hence it's only probable destination is global conflict and that is all which can be accredited to the Western Civilization which has been responsible for the first two World Wars. And if history is in any way teaching us anything, it shows the origin point is Europe and it's consequential british colonial off-spring, namely america, canada, australia, new zealand.

The Gripen can't carry the most weapons, has no real stealth, isn't the longest-range, fastest, or even cheapest jet, but it has a singular focus that makes it a nightmare for Russia's fighter jets.

Swedes think they're the only ones who have brains, that their strategy is somehow more tactically sound. They probably have short term memory loss, because the americans have already embarked upon upgrading their F-15s to have AESA radars. Their tactical planning is suppose to employ AESA F-15s to overwhelm the adversary aircraft, conducting electronic warfare with the F-15s, while the F-22s lead the assault. The only purpose the Gripen-Es, is that of being small component of NATO, that engages the Russians. Therefore it's capabilities are to be considered as "addtional" rather than exclusive.

Any country hoping to make Gripen-E the backbone of its air force would find it largely lacking against an air force which has AEWs, EWAs, AESA fighters and heavy duty, long range BVR missiles.

One thing is for certain though, Swedes are afflicted with similar "Superiority Complex" as their american, british, dutch and french cousins.
 
.
Hi,

Come on please---. Iran's claims cannot be matched to those of Sweden's---. There is a difference of day and night---.



Hi,

It is primarily the EW package that the russians would possibly not be able to compete against---.
Unless gora shahib says nothing is true.

We cannot get out of the kiss whiteman's ***
I am not shia or iranian but they laughed at iran when they claimed to have taken over the US drones. And we all knew what happened
 
.
Then a small nation (Serbia) manage to shoot down not just any American air force aircraft, the F-117 Knighthawk, their most advance aircraft in the 1990s, was shot down with old tech radar, Serbian enginuity and Cold War Era Surface-to-Air Missile.
The F-117 was not the 'most advance' aircraft of that time. My F-16 was more advanced in every way other than low radar observability.

The claim that the F-117 was the 'most advance' did not came from US but from sensationalist media seeking to exaggerate the impact of what the Serb did. If what the Serb did worked so good, then why only one F-117 was shot down?

The point I am trying to make is that the problem isn't technology,...
You have no point.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom