What's new

Surgical strike on Pak terrorists not first time

ito

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
9,177
Reaction score
-33
Country
India
Location
India
http://www.freepressjournal.in/india/surgical-strike-on-pak-terrorists-not-first-time/945467

New Delhi :
Former Home Minister P Chidambaram has gone on record to assert that the much-hyped surgical strike for punitive action against the terrorists crossing the Line of Control last Wednesday night was not for the first time.

He says a similar “major strike took place in January 2013, when the UPA government was in power but it chose not to go public in keeping with its policy of strategic restraint.”

He says it would be premature to describe the strike as a “paradigm shift” in the country’s policy towards Pakistan as claimed by the government. “We need to evaluate over a period of time whether this leads to a decline in cross border terror and deters Pakistan, before passing any judgment,” Chidambaram asserted, adding that in any case the government will have to own up the consequences of its decision.

He, however, made it clear that the Congress is fully behind the Modi government on the issue nd will continue to support it in the matters related to nation’s security.

Meanwhile, the retired Army generals say the Indian Army has been carrying out attacks on the Pakistan Army and the terrorist camps consequent to Islamabad’s continuing proxy war in Jammu and Kashmir. They cited one such attack on the Pakistani post across the Line of Control (LoC) 17 years ago, just six months after the Kargil wear, on January 22, 2000 in which 16 Pakistani soldiers were killed in the Chhamb sector.

They said the Pakistan Army too has been carrying out similar attacks on the Indian positions after cross the LoC. These trans-LoC attacks by both Armies stopped for a while after the November 2003 ceasefire, but there have been occasions even after the ceasefire when the India conducted retaliatory attacks across LoC such as one in response to decapitation of two Indian soldiers by the Pakistan Army in January 2013.

The Indian Army reportedly beheaded some five to 10 Pakistani soldiers in retaliation. The retired Army officers say it is for the first time that the government has officially acknowledged what the Indian Army has been doing for many years now by going public on the shallow-distance strikes carried out in the wee hours of September 29.

The strikes directly against the terrorists and not against the Pakistan Army has made known India’s resolve and capability to cross the LoC to strike at the terrorists at will, they said.

Most of these retirees want the government to make it a policy to conduct the preemptive surgical strikes on Pakistani terror factories on a relentlessly continuous basis to truly make it expensive for the terrorists and its Pakistani patrons. They said prevention, rather than cure, is ideally the answer to the problem but this requires both human and electronic intelligence to obtain real time actionable information. They say the well-equipped Special Forces will have to be on permanent stand-by to work in conjunction with the intelligence agencies.
 
.
But this is the first time at MULTIPLE locations -- Four places to be precise

Then declaring it openly is also a first

And above all we have proved that we are ready for an escalation
as we see the firing going on the LOC
 
.
Now Congress too has been claiming that it has conducted surgical strikes since 26/11, but never publicized. Now this is an interesting twist to the whole episode of surgical strikes.

But this is the first time at MULTIPLE locations -- Four places to be precise

Then declaring it openly is also a first

And above all we have proved that we are ready for an escalation
as we see the firing going on the LOC

Seem this is the first time India owned up the surgical strikes. As on multiple strikes, according to Congress, it has conducted a major one in 2013. So I think even the multiple strikes could have happened before.
 
.
Now Congress too has been claiming that it has conducted surgical strikes since 26/11, but never publicized. Now this is an interesting twist to the whole episode of surgical strikes.

That was after the beheading of one of our soldiers. The army chief of that time did say that they had avenged his death. So it was not exactly a secret but the govt chose to remain silent. The shift in policy is not the attack itself but the acknowledgement that it happened. Isn't it ironic that Pakistan is trying to prove that it did not happen instead of accusing India of aggression which is what they usually do?
 
.
Seem this is the first time India owned up the surgical strikes. As on multiple strikes, according to Congress, it has conducted a major one in 2013. So I think even the multiple strikes could have happened before.

No ; it is a first as far as Multiple locations and simultaneous strikes are concerned

This was evident by former chief Gen Bikram Singh when he said that the
Difference is the Political Backing and the " Complete Freedom " to the Army

This means that to hell with the Escalation ; we will take care of that too

Bikram SIngh was very emotional about this on TV

Because he did nt get any freedom from MMS
 
.
The news which he was quoting was ours : https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/154330-Indian-lies-exposed-all-over-the-world. fake " Sir G Kal " :rofl::lol:

2ikqkoz.jpg
 
.
The guys who attacked Baramulla were same who were attacked in "sir ji kal" strikes ?
 
.
That was after the beheading of one of our soldiers. The army chief of that time did say that they had avenged his death. So it was not exactly a secret but the govt chose to remain silent. The shift in policy is not the attack itself but the acknowledgement that it happened. Isn't it ironic that Pakistan is trying to prove that it did not happen instead of accusing India of aggression which is what they usually do?

Now with Congress's claim, the recent surgical seem even more plausible.

No ; it is a first as far as Multiple locations and simultaneous strikes are concerned

This was evident by former chief Gen Bikram Singh when he said that the
Difference is the Political Backing and the " Complete Freedom " to the Army

This means that to hell with the Escalation ; we will take care of that too

Bikram SIngh was very emotional about this on TV

Because he did nt get any freedom from MMS

I don't think with out Government backing, the army would have done it. The difference between this government and the older was, to own up the attacks.
 
.
Still that doesn't make a difference in stopping "terrorist" attacks in India....... How else do you define failure?
 
. . . .
Look at the Indians, when Pakistan make any thread on Sir-Ji-Kal strikes, they all go crazy and mock us Pakistanis why we are concerned. Indians preparing the strikes to prove them without any proof is just acceptable.

Hypocrisy at its best!

I have a question to you guys, are you feeling that the strikes were fake that's why you guys are trying hard to defend them by opening these kind threads on PDF? :-)

To me, Pakistan's desperation to prove it false is a telltale sign. PA was outsmarted on this occasion and their reaction has been even amusing.

Oye look who opened the thread to prove a fake event "real". :omghaha:
 
.
To me, Pakistan's desperation to prove it false is a telltale sign. PA was outsmarted on this occasion and their reaction has been even amusing.

Pakistan Army knows it that recent surgical strikes are not the first time. Where is was stumped was when India publicly announced that India conducted the strikes and owned up.
 
.
Now Congress too has been claiming that it has conducted surgical strikes since 26/11, but never publicized. Now this is an interesting twist to the whole episode of surgical strikes.



Seem this is the first time India owned up the surgical strikes. As on multiple strikes, according to Congress, it has conducted a major one in 2013. So I think even the multiple strikes could have happened before.

There is no twist, cross border operations are not new to both countries, the only reason this govt. went public is cuz of public anger and need of the hour for overt actions.

More like an physiological effect than changing ground realities much.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom