What's new

State-of-art New battle tanks to replace India’s ageing T-72 MBT

so you'll have about 100 of them by 2045 :azn:

It is not clear whether we're going to JV with foreign partners on platforms like Centauro or PL-01,if they can be changed into similar platforms mentioned...

Centauro01.JPEG


Domestic companies showed a lot of prospects,they patched up with foreign companies to make Arty..I'd vote fore something like TATA or L&T as their FICVs are quite good.sure they can come up with good products..

url


FICV_Future_Infantry_Combat_Vehicle_tracked_version_at_DefExpo_2012_Defence_Exhibition_India_New_Delhi_002.jpg


Though their capabilities are unknown..
 
View attachment 229892

AK is much more indigenous Rab even your failed Arjun most of which you still import from other countries..:lol:

AK is as indigenous as JF-17 , which is next to nill.... your contributions is to look above the chinese to see what they are doing .

Butt hurt at what ?? Pakistan ...... believe me nobody will be butt hurt at Pakistan .... not even Somalia .... :rofl:

You guys are big mouth....afterall you an indians.

url.jpg
 
AK is as indigenous as JF-17 , which is next to nill.... your contributions is to look above the chinese to see what they are doing .

Butt hurt at what ?? Pakistan ...... believe me nobody will be butt hurt at Pakistan .... not even Somalia .... :rofl:



url.jpg


Son, talk with facts .. Not farts!


P.S:
image.jpg
 
“The Indian Army is planning to design and develop a new generation, state-of-the-art combat vehicle platform for populating its armoured fighting vehicle fleet in the coming decade. This vehicle, which will be called the future ready combat vehicle (FRCV), will form the base platform for the main battle tank which is planned to replace the existing T-72 tanks in the Armoured Corps,”

Probably will cooperate with Russia and make something like armata.

OP doesnt suggest so.

But it may happen, so we should wait for more news and sources regarding FRCV.

Personally, I think FRCV will be based on Armata, product of JV between Russia and India.
 
OP doesnt suggest so.

But it may happen, so we should wait for more news and sources regarding FRCV.

Personally, I think FRCV will be based on Armata, product of JV between Russia and India.
your right but not just russia but israel france and even japan as france , india , japan , israel all have simmilar needs for a light yet robust and battle tested platform an an upgraded yet slightli bigger yet lighter T72 chassis with a better suspension and a bigger ( feul efficient 1200 BHP ) engine fits like a T into it and if given better protection with kanchan armour and israeli trophy type systemits gonna be pretty light(advanced mettalergy-here japnese will play there part)i wonder they can even make a armata like system with overall wieght of some 50 tonnes
 
your right but not just russia but israel france and even japan as france , india , japan , israel all have simmilar needs for a light yet robust and battle tested platform an an upgraded yet slightli bigger yet lighter T72 chassis with a better suspension and a bigger ( feul efficient 1200 BHP ) engine fits like a T into it and if given better protection with kanchan armour and israeli trophy type systemits gonna be pretty light(advanced mettalergy-here japnese will play there part)i wonder they can even make a armata like system with overall wieght of some 50 tonnes

@Capt.Popeye @sancho @MilSpec
 
T72's have a lot of life left, some of them have barely clocked 50K miles.
 
T72's have a lot of life left, some of them have barely clocked 50K miles.

Yes sir. Those upgraded T72 can be workhorse for IA for a dacade & half atleast. Seems like IA is fixed on Armata. Its just a surogate RFI to hide their intension.
 
View attachment 229892




AK is much more indigenous Rab even your failed Arjun most of which you still import from other countries..:lol:
lol Arjun -2 is in production , but i heard your army rejected the AK-2 tank..... Oh i forget a Failed AK-2 tank.

Might be AK-1 is also a failed, but like all the missiles test are successful in PAK, in the same way AK-1 is also a success .

If DRDO is doing it, that means it is not doing it.
Dont worry India has good trank record, as far as i know Arjuna -2 is in production and AK-2 is rejected by PA, Moreover if AK-2 is rejected then on what basis AK-1 is qualified ? or It is also failed tank but has not other option but buy and declare successful like a missile tests which successful even missile fall in half way?
 
lol Arjun -2 is in production , but i heard your army rejected the AK-2 tank..... Oh i forget a Failed AK-2 tank.


So they failed a tank that's still under development? Butthurt much ?:rofl:
Might be AK-1 is also a failed, but like all the missiles test are successful in PAK, in the same way AK-1 is also a success
.
Yes 500 in service and exported to several countries ..:rofl:

Dont worry India has good trank record, as far as i know Arjuna -2 is in production and AK-2 is rejected by PA, Moreover if AK-2 is rejected then on what basis AK-1 is qualified ? or It is also failed tank but has not other option but buy and declare successful like a missile tests which successful even missile fall in half way?

119-24 in service which remain grounded due to lack of spares .. Not even counting the flawed design .. Arjun 2 another dead project :lol:



image.jpg




Somebody give this kid a Burnol..:lol:
 
So they failed a tank that's still under development? Butthurt much ?:rofl:
May be someone need eductated , in 2014 , order of MK-2 released and production started.

.
Yes 500 in service and exported to several countries ..:rofl:

First time in history is happened when the upgraded version is failed ..:omghaha:.. 500 in services is like the PAK missiles in Services , when each blowing in mid way, but they was successful because due to numbers , it is your way to judge the thing successful ? :haha::haha:

Your missiles is also in service but with faulty guidance system ...... lol

.
119-24 in service which remain grounded due to lack of spares .. Not even counting the flawed design .. Arjun 2 another dead project :lol:

View attachment 230240

that all different issues , like your F-16 was grounded due to lack of spares, so dose that make the F-16 a failed plane? If Yes , then i accept Arjun is failed tank. use common logic for all things..


lol height of desperation,

Not rejected, it'll be another rebranded Chinese product.
AK-2 Models is not goes into production due to the failure find is AK-1 is not rectified in Ak-2. so its dropped all together.

People of PDF is criting High cost of tank but when asked the cost of tank vs Budget ..... they dont have any answer . They are trying to hide their failed tank in number and cost.
 
May be someone need eductated , in 2014 , order of MK-2 released and production started.

:rofl:

How does someone need "educated"... :lol:


Arjun mk2 it's dead .. Haven't you heard recent news?:lol:


And how many are in service ?:lol:
.
First time in history is happened when the upgraded version is failed ..:omghaha:.. 500 in services is like the PAK missiles in Services , when each blowing in mid way, but they was successful because due to numbers , it is way you count the thing successful ? :haha::haha:

Your missiles is also in service but with faulty guidance system ...... lol

The rantings of a frustrated loser..:lol:

Retired how does a tank fail that is still under development ? indian logic?:lol:


AK-I 500 in service - exported (low end - export model) to several countries for almost 4 million $ a unit.
image.jpg

.
that all different issues , like your F-16 was grounded due to lack of spares, so dose that make the F-16 a failed plane? If Yes , then i accept Arjun is failed tank. use common logic for all things..


lol height of desperation...
The missile bursting happened in india not Pak:lol:


That was in 1990s when Pak was sanctioned and we still managed to get the spares from brotherly nations like Turkiye..

P.S: Are you comparing F-16 with a dead skunk Arjun ? A failed tank ... A flawed design that Evn your military didn't accept and was capped at 119-24 for face saving ?:lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom