What's new

Sri Lanka lifts unofficial ban on singing national anthem in Tamil

What do u mean? Does your word have any sense at all? SL and TN are barely separated at all. Its easily accessible by the simplest of boats.
Do you mean to say SL tamils should have a separate identity jus cos they lived in a separate island for 1000's of years is really idiotic particularly, when the distance btw TN and SL is not much.

Then how come Sinhalese were able to retain their identity for the past 2500 years. If your theory is right Sri Lanka should have been a Tamil nation.

Distance means nothing when it comes to shaping the cultural identity.

Also you claim that SL Tamils were lived had close contacts with Tamilnadu Tamils just because the distance between Jaffna and Tamilnadu is so small. Then why not these Jaffna Tamils did not have any contacts with Sinhalese living just few miles down the island? Did Tamils lived in total isolation like an undiscovered tribe?
 
.
This was a request made by former ealamist mano ganeshan.
By encouraging these type of Tamil nationalism, Colombo will surely lose the control of Northern council.
Rather than promoting domestic languages, it is beneficial to promote a mutual understandable language.

you have three choices
English
Sinhalese
some mix of Sinhalese/Tamil
 
.
Then how come Sinhalese were able to retain their identity for the past 2500 years. If your theory is right Sri Lanka should have been a Tamil nation.

Distance means nothing when it comes to shaping the cultural identity.

Also you claim that SL Tamils were lived had close contacts with Tamilnadu Tamils just because the distance between Jaffna and Tamilnadu is so small. Then why not these Jaffna Tamils did not have any contacts with Sinhalese living just few miles down the island? Did Tamils lived in total isolation like an undiscovered tribe?

Why the hell would the tamils would want to assimilate into a culture far down south with the Sinhalese when the tamils were separated by less than 10km from the Indian mainland.?

What identity did the Sinhalese maintain? They were hindus in the past, and the identity got changed to Buddhism again due to Indian influence. We are maintaining the same identity.
 
.
you have three choices
English
Sinhalese
some mix of Sinhalese/Tamil

Sinhalese only. English can be accepted. Others who need Tamil can f*ck themselves or can go to Tamilnadu. This is high time that Sinhalese take a tougher stand on separatist.
 
.
Sinhalese only. English can be accepted. Others who need Tamil can f*ck themselves or can go to Tamilnadu. This is high time that Sinhalese take a tougher stand on separatist.
:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Sinhalese only. English can be accepted. Others who need Tamil can f*ck themselves or can go to Tamilnadu. This is high time that Sinhalese take a tougher stand on separatist.

It's already there dumb a$s.. And had been since 1949, Nobody really cared.. So you can go fcuk your self
 
.

Don't beat yourself to death. It is only Sinhalese that think about the country and the minorities. Tamils and Muslims do not think likewise. They think only about themselves. This fact is shown abundantly clear in the last election. Sinhalese divided on the fact good governance and political stability but Tamil and Muslims made a block vote to over throw Mahinda.

Actually I'm not blaming the majority Tamil and Muslim populace. It is their leaders who corrupt the minds of the innocents. We as a nation is divided politically on ethnicity basis. Sinhalese alone cannot make Sri Lanka a true multi cultural nation. We seriously need to take out the race based political parties like TNA and Muslim congress. It is high time now.

It's already there dumb a$s.. And had been since 1949, Nobody really cared.. So you can go fcuk your self

What is wrong is wrong. Whether it is done today or 66 years ago. Besides you don't live in Sri Lanka. But I do. What ever happens in SL has a effect on my life. But it has no effect on your life.

Why the hell would the tamils would want to assimilate into a culture far down south with the Sinhalese when the tamils were separated by less than 10km from the Indian mainland.?

What identity did the Sinhalese maintain? They were hindus in the past, and the identity got changed to Buddhism again due to Indian influence. We are maintaining the same identity.

First of all. The shortest possible distance between Sri Lanka and India is 32 km.

And the closest kingdom for the Jaffna Tamils were at Anuradhapura not Tanjore or Madurai. So there was ample reason for Tamils to mingle with Sinhalese other than Tamils who lived far away.

There is no evidence to believe that early Sinhalese were Hindu other than the fact that you believe any one worship a religion except the 4 main ones to be Hindu.
 
.
h time now.



What is wrong is wrong. Whether it is done today or 66 years ago. Besides you don't live in Sri Lanka. But I do. What ever happens in SL has a effect on my life. But it has no effect on your life.

Why yes.. Some thing as innocuous and had been in practice for 66 years now suddenly will be the cause for
separation, Funny enough it that endorses patriotism not separation.. Are you born stupid or just brainwashed to be a bigot ?
 
.
Why yes.. Some thing as innocuous and had been in practice for 66 years now suddenly will be the cause for
separation, Funny enough it that endorses patriotism not separation.. Are you born stupid or just brainwashed to be a bigot ?

Yes. No one gave a hoot about it for the past 60 or so years. And it didn't stop the growth of separatism. Why suddenly anyone need to revoke the decision that has taken 5-6 years ago to unofficially ban it?

No Tamil asked for this nor they fought for it. Just because Mano Ganeshan the LTTE sympathizer proposed it no one need to revoke something that is useless.
 
.
Yes. No one gave a hoot about it for the past 60 or so years. And it didn't stop the growth of separatism. Why suddenly anyone need to revoke the decision that has taken 5-6 years ago to unofficially ban it?

No Tamil asked for this nor they fought for it. Just because Mano Ganeshan the LTTE sympathizer proposed it no one need to revoke something that is useless.

You dumb arse, That ban itself is illegal just like most of the things your closeted racist Rajapaksa regime did, Only brain dead bigots like you would endorse illegal bans, Because it suits your racist agenda
 
.
You dumb arse, That ban itself is illegal just like most of the things your closeted racist Rajapaksa regime did, Only brain dead bigots like you would endorse illegal bans, Because it suits your racist agenda

Just curious. What is my racist agenda? I wanna clear it out from you.
 
.
Don't beat yourself to death. It is only Sinhalese that think about the country and the minorities. Tamils and Muslims do not think likewise. They think only about themselves. This fact is shown abundantly clear in the last election. Sinhalese divided on the fact good governance and political stability but Tamil and Muslims made a block vote to over throw Mahinda.

Actually I'm not blaming the majority Tamil and Muslim populace. It is their leaders who corrupt the minds of the innocents. We as a nation is divided politically on ethnicity basis. Sinhalese alone cannot make Sri Lanka a true multi cultural nation. We seriously need to take out the race based political parties like TNA and Muslim congress. It is high time now.
Sinhalese or others, no one seems to care about the country but their own agenda whether its personal or communal. That's what wrong with Sri Lanka today. People are obsessed with their own short sighted worlds that they have created for themselves but not one person to care for the well-being of the country and its people. That seems to be the only thing in common between minorities and majority. :lol:

MR used to care about the country but after his 2nd election he started caring about his own personal goals rather than the country. That's what sets him apart from leaders of other developed SE/East Asian countries. If he kept him humbleness and didn't engage in corruption or marking his name on every damm thing in the country, he would still be in the temple trees.
 
.
Sinhalese or others, no one seems to care about the country but their own agenda whether its personal or communal. That's what wrong with Sri Lanka today. People are obsessed with their own short sighted worlds that they have created for themselves but not one person to care for the well-being of the country and its people. That seems to be the only thing in common between minorities and majority. :lol:

MR used to care about the country but after his 2nd election he started caring about his own personal goals rather than the country. That's what sets him apart from leaders of other developed SE/East Asian countries. If he kept him humbleness and didn't engage in corruption or marking his name on every damm thing in the country, he would still be in the temple trees.

It seems that you have taken Sinhalese far lighter than required. Sinhalese has always stood up to the threats of their mother land. But majority Tamils and Muslims don't. I'm just curious. Why have you thought that Sinhalese also only thinks about their own well being rather than the country. Can you give me some examples?

I do agree with you on certain parts about the MR's second reign as the president. But he was much better than the rest of the leaders put together. Also those leaders you mentioned were more corrupted than MR.
 
.
It seems that you have taken Sinhalese far lighter than required. Sinhalese has always stood up to the threats of their mother land. But majority Tamils and Muslims don't. I'm just curious. Why have you thought that Sinhalese also only thinks about their own well being rather than the country. Can you give me some examples?

I do agree with you on certain parts about the MR's second reign as the president. But he was much better than the rest of the leaders put together. Also those leaders you mentioned were more corrupted than MR.
You are kidding right?!! Look at the Muslims who sacrificed their life in the war against LTTE. Nizam Muthaliff who was exposed by a Sinhalese traitor (Ranil) comes to my mind. So are the Tamils like Lakshman Kadiragaman. The issue with Muslims is the current trend of isolation otherwise historically (when they were liberal), they have contributed to the country. There's plenty of such people if you want to find. If we discriminate against all minorities, then the chances will be that we will not find anyone from a minority background who will be loyal to the country and we will create a mess where we can forever stay as a 3rd world shithole. So this is why I am saying, we should provide equality every loyal loyal Sri Lankan citizen given that he/she contributes to the interest of the country and at the same time we severely punish those who work against the interest of the country.

I am Sinhalese and I have experienced this by myself. Sinhalese are very selfish.

If MR ruled even longer, he would have become even worse given the trend at which he started working for himself.

.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom