Sri Lanka Cabinet approves proposed ban on burqas in public

[El Sidd]

You did not get it my friend. What is happening in Iraq, Syria and Yemen are civil wars.

Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban etc Jihadi group's motto is defeat west and its allies and establish Shariah in the entire world. This motto is one reason why governments of non Muslim countries are afraid of these radical groups and have taken tough measures.

Will Al Qaeda and ISIS ever attack Saudi? Why would they? It is already a Sharia run state and so the King of Saudi has nothing to fear.

Al Qaeda was formed primarily targeting Saudi Arabia for hosting Western troops on Arabian soil.

If you would tell me your village, i will help restore modern communications to your village so you can have a little bit modern enlightenment.

Questions however you pose is good. I want to ask them too. Why not look East? West is on highway to hell anyhow for them.

Let's look east

 

[Trango Towers]

You did not get it my friend. What is happening in Iraq, Syria and Yemen are civil wars.

Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban etc Jihadi group's motto is defeat west and its allies and establish Shariah in the entire world. This motto is one reason why governments of non Muslim countries are afraid of these radical groups and have taken tough measures.

Will Al Qaeda and ISIS ever attack Saudi? Why would they? It is already a Sharia run state and so the King of Saudi has nothing to fear.

Loooool graduate of fox news I see

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Al Qaeda was formed primarily targeting Saudi Arabia for hosting Western troops on Arabian soil.

If you would tell me your village, i will help restore modern communications to your village so you can have a little bit modern enlightenment.

Questions however you pose is good. I want to ask them too. Why not look East? West is on highway to hell anyhow for them.

Let's look east

If Al Qaeda was formed to fight Saudi, then why their main motto is to wage Jihad against America and Christian west?

 

[El Sidd]

If Al Qaeda was formed to fight Saudi, then why their main motto is to wage Jihad against America and Christian west?

How do you know their motto without wearing a Burqa?

 

[Surya 1]

When will India learn from Sri Lanka?

 

[Buddhistforlife]

How do you know their motto without wearing a Burqa?

@Trango Towers and @El Sidd

Listen minorities cannot have absolute freedom. This is not possible. Not even the most liberal Western nations give 100% freedom to minorities.

Also You guys talk like as if Muslim majority countries give 100% freedom to minorities. In many Muslim majority countries you cannot eat pork, built church and temple and hold government positions. Do not give me secular bullshit because Sri Lanka is a Buddhist country by constitution(Read article 9)

So yes minorities cannot have absolute freedom in any country.

 

[El Sidd]

@Trango Towers and @El Sidd

Listen minorities cannot have absolute freedom. This is not possible. Not even the most liberal Western nations give 100% freedom to minorities.

Also You guys talk like as if Muslim majority countries give 100% freedom to minorities. In many Muslim majority countries you cannot eat pork, built church and temple and hold government positions. Do not give me secular bullshit because Sri Lanka is a Buddhist country by constitution(Read article 9)

So yes minorities cannot have absolute freedom in any country.

So its more about limiting Muslim freedom and nothing to do with measures against terrorism.

Why don't you say it like that? It may help people understand more about the issue than mindless fear mongering.

In what other ways does Buddhism limit freedom?

 

[Trango Towers]

@Trango Towers and @El Sidd

Listen minorities cannot have absolute freedom. This is not possible. Not even the most liberal Western nations give 100% freedom to minorities.

Also You guys talk like as if Muslim majority countries give 100% freedom to minorities. In many Muslim majority countries you cannot eat pork, built church and temple and hold government positions. Do not give me secular bullshit because Sri Lanka is a Buddhist country by constitution(Read article 9)

So yes minorities cannot have absolute freedom in any country.

I think you have a mental issue.
Muslims in Sri Lanka are native not migrants.
Itsvtheir land as much as anyone else land. So if you become a minority should your women be told that you cannot wear sun glasses because some stupid person has decided upon that.
Regarding Muslim majority countries. Take Saudi as an example. Pakistanis are Muslims and they still have the rights of a Sri Lankan buddhist because he isn't Saudi not because he isn't Muslims.
So brain before typing

 

[Buddhistforlife]

I think you have a mental issue.
Muslims in Sri Lanka are native not migrants.
Itsvtheir land as much as anyone else land. So if you become a minority should your women be told that you cannot wear sun glasses because some stupid person has decided upon that.
Regarding Muslim majority countries. Take Saudi as an example. Pakistanis are Muslims and they ill have the rights of a Sri Lankan buddhist because he isn't Saudi not because he isn't Muslims.
So brain before typing

Pakistani Hindus and Christians are also not migrants and they are native of Pakistan. Why don't you allow them to become president and prime minister then? See how logic works.

 

[El Sidd]

It's my personal opinion btw. I believe Muslims are demanding too much freedom meanwhile minority citizens are somewhat discriminated in many Muslim majority countries.

The decade is going to be all about Myanmar and radical Buddhist monk terror.

It will be interesting warfare as man goes back to the jungle.

Good stuff.

Sri Lanka should think twice if it wants to be collateral again after relative short term peace from internal strife. Sri Lanka saw the most organized effort by terrorist organisation spanning decades.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

So its more about limiting Muslim freedom and nothing to do with measures against terrorism.

Why don't you say it like that? It may help people understand more about the issue than mindless fear mongering.

In what other ways does Buddhism limit freedom?

So what is wrong In limiting freedom for Muslims?

As I told you Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Cambodia and Bhutan are Buddhist countries and not secular states(at least not as secular as India and West). Bhutan is a strict Buddhist country where preaching other faith is prohibited. So it has the every right to limit freedom for Muslims.

In Muslim countries where Islam is given priority in the constitution or Islam is the state religion, minorites have restrictions too. In Pakistan Hindus cannot become president, in Malaysia non Muslim cannot become PM. Why don't you speak about them too?

Why do you want constitutional Buddhist countries to give equal rights when Islamic nations don't give equal rights?

 

[El Sidd]

So what is wrong In limiting freedom for Muslims

Nothing but they just like to fight back oppression specially systematic oppression. There exists an innate sense and desire to resist in the Muslims.

In Muslim countries where Islam is given priority in the constitution or Islam is the state religion, minorites have restrictions too. In Pakistan Hindus cannot become president, in Malaysia non Muslim cannot become PM. Why don't you speak about them too?

That is entirely a different subject matter. But Malaysia, Pakistan and most Muslim majority countries allow personal and religious freedom lest for public safety. That's why i asked how Sri Lanka arrived at the decision that burqa equals terrorism.

Why do you want constitutional Buddhist countries to give equal rights when Islamic nations don't give equal rights?

Because only radical Buddhists believe that a constitutional Buddhist state limits other religions contribution to the country.

 

[darksider]

Last week some terrorist nutjob bombed a hotel in Quetta Balochistan.

they were not wearing burqa.
but I totally agree with a non-Muslim majority country can do what they want.
their country their rules. you guys should not cry if any Muslim country makes rules like this for minorities.
if native Muslims have any reservations about this rule then they have to come open protest about it.

When will India loan from Sri Lanka?

it should be quickly.

@people who are showing concerns for indian hindus because of corona see above commment of indian hindu^^^^
they will bite you like snake every time when they get a chance. they will not remember you were worrying about them.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

they were not wearing burqa.
but I totally agree with a non-Muslim majority country can do what they want.
their country their rules. you guys should not cry if any Muslim country makes rules like this for minorities.
if native Muslims have any reservations about this rule then they have to come open protest about it.

it should be quickly.

@people who are showing concerns for indian hindus because of corona see above commment of indian hindu^^^^
they will bite you like snake every time when they get a chance. they will not remember you were worrying about them.

We are not crying. In Saudi Arabia, Maldives you cannot find churches and temples because they are 100% Muslim countries and you won't find a Christian or a Hindu complaining about that.

Nothing but they just like to fight back oppression specially systematic oppression. There exists an innate sense and desire to resist in the Muslims.
That is entirely a different subject matter. But Malaysia, Pakistan and most Muslim majority countries allow personal and religious freedom lest for public safety. That's why i asked how Sri Lanka arrived at the decision that burqa equals terrorism.


Because only radical Buddhists believe that a constitutional Buddhist state limits other religions contribution to the country.

We are not limiting any contribution. Buddhist countries especially the ones with state religion like Bhutan and Cambodia have state policy to promote Buddhist ideology.

Even Cambodia has Angkor wat, the most holiest Buddhist temple of Cambodia in its national flag.

These country cannot allow Islamic culture to be openly practiced in their realm. In many Muslim countries non Muslims cannot eat pork in public not can eat in public during Ramadan.

 

[El Sidd]

We are not limiting any contribution. Buddhist countries especially the ones with state religion like Bhutan and Cambodia have state policy to promote Buddhist ideology.

Even Cambodia has Angkor wat, the most holiest Buddhist temple of Cambodia in its national flag.

These country cannot allow Islamic culture to be openly practiced in their realm. In many Muslim countries non Muslims cannot eat pork in public not can eat in public during Ramadan.

I am not asking you to explain the importance of golden triangle.

Face covering does not threaten Buddhist culture or identity. The male dominated Buddhist culture has a problem with women making their own choices?