South China Sea Forum

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Lol, rubbish hawai doesnt be contested by more than six countries.

It's not rubbish, if anyone think that's contested island then try take it back from us

 

[Dungeness]

Lol, rubbish hawai doesnt be contested by more than six countries.

Well, from China point of view, being contested is one more reason that they need to protect their asset. What else do you expect?

 

[Pulsar]

China and other 4 CREATED the UN. There was no India back then, sorry.

Sorry, but you need to read your history. It was India that was offered a seat in the UNSC as a permanent member back then but, as usual our great leader Nehru refused for some inexplicable reason and instead pushed for China to become a permanent member instead!

Had it not been for Nehru and his silly policies, it would have been India sitting there today. So you need to thank India for this.

 

[Dungeness]

Sorry, but you need to read your history. It was India that was offered a seat in the UNSC as a permanent member back then but, as usual our great leader Nehru refused for some inexplicable reason and instead pushed for China to become a permanent member instead!

Had it not been for Nehru and his silly policies, it would have been India sitting there today. So you need to thank India for this.

There are two versions of history: one is called History, the other is called Indian History.

 

[Pulsar]

There are two versions of history: one is called History, the other is called Indian History.

Don't talk like a knucklehead. Read...

India was offered a permanent seat on the council 55 years ago, in 1955. But that offer, made by the United States and the Soviet Union, was declined by India's first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru. Nehru said the seat should be given to China instead.
Obama supports adding India as a permanent member of U.N. Security Council

 

[Oldman1]

How did come to that?

Japan view U.S. deployment of warships in Hawaii to its threat to its holdings in Asia. So they made the first move. China seeing Hawaii as a threat to its holdings in South China Sea as a threat as well.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Japan view U.S. deployment of warships in Hawaii to its threat to its holdings in Asia. So they made the first move. China seeing Hawaii as a threat to its holdings in South China Sea as a threat as well.

LOL that's bullsh1t logic, American's China containment policy such as first island Chain is a threat to China, now what we did in SCS is not only to break this chain but to use that chain to our advantage and make American taste their own medicine....that's why you American is crying out loud for freedom of navigation...LMAO what irony.

 

[Oldman1]

LOL that's bullsh1t logic, American's China containment policy such as first island Chain is a threat to China, now what we did in SCS is not only to break this chain but to use that chain to our advantage and make American taste their own medicine....that's why you American is crying out loud for freedom of navigation...LMAO what irony.

Just don't want a repeat of history. As you said, you want to expand.

 

[Dungeness]

Don't talk like a knucklehead. Read...

An article on Washington Post is your bible? Show me UN document.

Check this one out. It is dangerous if one takes dream as the reality.

united nations - Did India turn down a permanent seat in the UN in 1955? - History Stack Exchange

The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies

 

[Abacin]

Japan view U.S. deployment of warships in Hawaii to its threat to its holdings in Asia. So they made the first move. China seeing Hawaii as a threat to its holdings in South China Sea as a threat as well.

It is US seeing Chinese deployment in SCS as a threat to USA,. If USA doesn't see as a threat, then just let China do at our will on SCS and peace arrives for China and USA.

China has no interest in US deployment in Hawaii, or even Philippines. We are only interested in US deployment in SCS.

 

[TaiShang]

What an idiot comparison, since HawaiI is not contested by the US's neighbours. Typical Russian RT garbage

Nansha and Xisha are not contested, either. People think they do contest.

Just don't want a repeat of history. As you said, you want to expand.

It won't be repeated, rest assured, since the US will not manage to start a conflict.

 

[Pulsar]

An article on Washington Post is your bible? Show me UN document.

Check this one out. It is dangerous if one takes dream as the reality.

united nations - Did India turn down a permanent seat in the UN in 1955? - History Stack Exchange

The Hindu : Miscellaneous / This Day That Age : dated September 28, 1955: UN seat: Nehru clarifies

Similarly, Stack Exchange and the Hindu is your bible?

Nehru would obviously have denied it since he had come under a lot of fire for refusing the seat without consulting the Parliament.

And the UN doesn't record everything!

 

[Speeder 2]

Sounds like a threat to put Hawaii on the list of targets in the event of any attack on our Spratly island bases! Another powerful move!

Beijing says bolstering S. China Sea defense same as US presence in Hawaii — RT News

Hawaii is not enough, should have been the Caribbeans which are more appropriate.

 

[Dungeness]

Similarly, Stack Exchange and the Hindu is your bible?

Nehru would obviously have denied it since he had come under a lot of fire for refusing the seat without consulting the Parliament.

And the UN doesn't record everything!

I was hoping you could pick up some critical thinking skills. Never mind, enjoy.

 

[SEAISI]

@ahojunk thanks for the note.

Hope I got it right this time

From this

to this

Keep up the good work