What's new

So the US and the UK voted against an investigation into the Nord Stream sabotage.

.

Well, here is the complete and true picture: (NO ONE voted against the resolution.)


"The Security Council failed today to adopt a resolution, put forward by the representative of the Russian Federation, which would have established an international independent investigative commission into the September 2022 “acts of sabotage” committed on the Nord Stream gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea.

By a vote of 3 in favour (Brazil, China, Russian Federation) to none against, with 12 abstentions, the Council rejected the draft resolution, owing to a lack of sufficient votes in favour.

The resolution, if adopted, would have requested the Secretary-General to establish an international, independent investigation commission to conduct a comprehensive, transparent and impartial international investigation of all aspects of the act of sabotage on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines — including identification of its perpetrators, sponsors, organizers and accomplices."
 
.
The Twitter asked a very-easy-to-answer question. LOL.

Well, here is the complete and true picture: (NO ONE voted against the resolution.)


"The Security Council failed today to adopt a resolution, put forward by the representative of the Russian Federation, which would have established an international independent investigative commission into the September 2022 “acts of sabotage” committed on the Nord Stream gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea.

By a vote of 3 in favour (Brazil, China, Russian Federation) to none against, with 12 abstentions, the Council rejected the draft resolution, owing to a lack of sufficient votes in favour.

The resolution, if adopted, would have requested the Secretary-General to establish an international, independent investigation commission to conduct a comprehensive, transparent and impartial international investigation of all aspects of the act of sabotage on the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines — including identification of its perpetrators, sponsors, organizers and accomplices."

Got your 50 cents easy? You must make hundreds everyday you are on the keyboards eyeing multiple post threads, forums, and boards.
 
.
The Twitter asked a very-easy-to-answer question. LOL.



Got your 50 cents easy? You must make hundreds everyday you are on the keyboards eyeing multiple post threads, forums, and boards.

Really? That tweet and this thread title is FALSE. NO ONE voted against that resolution. :D
 
.
A Pole's words "Thank you, USA" might have something to do with it.


Former Polish foreign minister thanks US for damaging Nord Stream pipeline​

Politician suggests US was behind attack on gas pipeline​

Murat Temizer |28.09.2022 - Update : 28.09.2022

Former Polish foreign minister thanks US for damaging Nord Stream pipeline


Danish Defense shows the gas leaking at Nord Stream 2 seen from the Danish F-16 interceptor on Bornholm, Denmark on September 27, 2022.

ANKARA
Radoslaw Sikorski, European Parliament member and former Polish foreign minister, insinuated that the US had deliberately inflicted damage on the Nord Stream gas pipeline.
On his Twitter account late Tuesday, Sikorski shared a photograph of gas leak, saying "Thank you, USA."
He commented that there is no pipeline shortage to transfer gas from Russia to Western Europe, including Germany.
All Ukrainian and Baltic Sea states have opposed the construction of the Nord Stream for 20 years, he said, adding the "Nord Stream's only logic was for Putin to be able to blackmail or wage war on Eastern Europe with impunity."
"Now $20 billion of scrap metal lies at the bottom of the sea, another cost to Russia of its criminal decision to invade Ukraine,” he said.
On Monday, Danish authorities reported a gas leak from the defunct Nord Stream 2 pipeline close to the island of Bornholm in the Baltic Sea.
Shortly after discoveries of the leaks on the Russian Nord Stream 2, the Swedish Maritime Authority issued a warning on Tuesday about two leaks on the Russia-owned Nord Stream 1 pipeline in Swedish and Danish waters.
Denmark's energy agency confirmed three leaks were detected on Nord Stream 1 and on Nord Stream 2 gas pipelines, northeast and southeast of the island of Bornholm.
The Russia-owned Nord Stream 2 pipeline flowing from Russia under the Baltic Sea to Germany was originally constructed to double the volume of gas. However, as soon as construction finished, Germany decided to halt operations after the start of Russia's war on Ukraine.
Russia stopped the Nord Stream 1 pipeline that stretches 1,200 kilometers (745 miles) under the Baltic Sea from the Russian coast near St Petersburg to northeastern Germany following German's decision to cut gas supplies from Nord Stream 2.
 
. .
Even D Trump displayed a higher IQ than you'd shown in answering the Nord Stream question.

Really? I posted the official release of the UN with the exact vote tally for single digit IQs to understand. Obviously, you did not qualify:

By a vote of 3 in favour (Brazil, China, Russian Federation) to none against, with 12 abstentions, the Council rejected the draft resolution, owing to a lack of sufficient votes in favour.

That OP tweet and the tread title is FALSE.
 
.
Really? I posted the official release of the UN with the exact vote tally for single digit IQs to understand. Obviously, you did not qualify:



That OP tweet and the tread title is FALSE.

Go watch the interview Trump was asked about who bombed the Nord Stream. Obviously you haven't finished your high school, or perhaps junior high because you obviously didn't understand the twitted question:
"Now why would they do that?
🤔"

Counting the number of votes from a body that's largely held in blackmail by the US doesn't answer the question.
 
.
Go watch the interview Trump was asked about who bombed the Nord Stream.

WTF has that to do with how the members voted on the resolution? Obviously you did not read the OP or the title for THIS thread. :D

Counting the number of votes from a body that's largely held in blackmail by the US doesn't answer the question.

Except that the tweet, the OP and the title are FALSE. The twittertit claims FALSELY that USA and UK voted against the resolution which THEY DID NOT, and then asked a question why they did "that" meaning how they VOTED. FALSE. Hence BS.




Further, there is no PROOF as of yet that I am aware of that shows WHO did anything to Nord Stream. If you have ANY PROOF, please present it.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom