Should he-man be permanently banned?

[Nilesh Singh]

@he-man congrats mate you have already made this thread us versus them hell even mods TT are also jumping.

 

[A.M.]

Who are you?

Just another attention seeker it seems like.

 

[he-man]

Who are you?

Just another attention seeker it seems like.

Maybe

 

[SvenSvensonov]

Friends,the day of reckoning has come,my negatives have piled up to an unacceptable number and almost all the mods have made it clear to me that i am on the verge of being permanently banned.For those who have seen my posts,i want an honest opinion on whether mods are right in this?

Please be frank in expressing your opinions.

For people unfamiliar with my situation

View attachment 202390

Do you want to be banned? If I was a mod, I'd ban you if you requested it - I'm not a mod so you're off the hook, but if you aren't accumulating additional infractions, and from what I've seen with your recent posts you haven't been, then there is little reason to ban you.

When's the last time you got a negative rating? It seems your ratings are older and thus lose relevance.

*EDIT - Yesterday, yesterday was the last time you got a negative rating.

Also, not everyone on that list, the list of people with the most negative ratings has been banned permanently.

Should you be banned permanently? No, you shouldn't.

 

[Lord ZeN]

@he-man Who are you ? Never seen you around.
If you want i can give you my account.

 

[he-man]

When's the last time you got a negative rating

I got 3 yesterday for a very benign post.

@he-man Who are you ? Never seen you around.
If you want i can give you my account.

He-man is a state of mind,an idea..............

 

[Levina]

30 negatives??
How did you manage that?
I think you're secular like me, but a bit more brusque when it comes to expressing your opinion. And no, I dont want you banned.

Not so long back I used to think you were a psycho Lolzz
You'd trolled me on bimaru corner for my ostensibly femi-nazi attitude. Remember?

 

[gau8av]

@he-man pehle RazPak ka record beat kar ke dikhao, that guy was almost upto 70 in the red column before he got the perma ban hammer, re appeared as zaalim before another ban, not sure what he is today.. absolute legend for -ves on a single id, what a champion that guy is.

also, MokshaVimukhti and all his ids over the months/years is probably way past a 100 -ves

until then, you're still in the little league, he-boy

 

[he-man]

@he-man pehle RazPak ka record beat kar ke dikhao, that guy was almost upto 70 in the red column before he got the perma ban hammer, re appeared as zaalim before another ban, not sure what he is today.. absolute legend for -ves on a single id, what a champion that guy is.

also, MokshaVimukhti and all his ids over the months/years is probably way past a 100 -ves

until then, you're still in the little league, he-boy

Problem is my negatives have come mostly in military matters without any swear words/abusive language.
I am at my best behavior unlike razpak and co

Btw nice try at trying to shore me up to get banned

 

[forcetrip]

Ill be one to say that I am actually pretty confused on how these negative ratings work. If you do not cuss, insult someone personally, say something really idiotic or clap for anyone who is killing innocents it does not break the forum rules. Disagreeing with someones content to mark negatively is pretty weak in a discussion. Trolling posts need to be taken care of differently. Some other way should be implemented. Thread bans were a good way to keep an area clean.

 

[Levina]

Disagreeing with someones content to mark negatively is pretty weak in a discussion.

Spot on!!
I'm wondering why don't we have more sane TTAs like you.


Recently a TTA had threatened me with a negative because I rated @he-man 's post with a like,which said "and you 're the think tank of this forum" (after the TTA had made a low quality post on a thread).

 

[he-man]

Ill be one to say that I am actually pretty confused on how these negative ratings work. If you do not cuss, insult someone personally, say something really idiotic or clap for anyone who is killing innocents it does not break the forum rules. Disagreeing with someones content to mark negatively is pretty weak in a discussion. Trolling posts need to be taken care of differently. Some other way should be implemented. Thread bans were a good way to keep an area clean.

Well u are free to see my 10000+ posts and good luck trying to find objectionable language.

 

[Levina]

Well u are free to see my 10000+ posts and good luck trying to find objectionable language.

Hey do you remember that thread and the OP?

 

[he-man]

Hey do you remember that thread and the OP?

Na.

 

[forcetrip]

Spot on!!
I'm wondering why don't we have more sane TTAs like you.


Recently a TTA had threatened me with a negative because I rated @he-man 's post with a like,which said "and you 're the think tank of this forum" (after the TTA had made a low quality post on a thread).

There might be a few who use their heavy hand during a discussion. I usually make a mental note and pass their post the next time around. So much to learn with so little time.