Shaksgam valley: Two basic questions

[Sal12]

If you go by Indian media pundits, then AJK and Gilgit Baltistan will go into India hands by end of June or early July. Since Pakistan already gave up Shaksgam valley then Indians wont have it after in June. I guess this is why Indians are complaining.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

No. It's not fault. Pak did not give any inch of territory it holds. It actually got hundreds of sq miles of territory from China. Also border with China was settled and it laid a foundation of long lasting relationship between China and Pakistan.

We never controlled it.

Pakistan never controlled Shaksgam valley. Pakistanis were never present there. But it was still part of J&K. Pakistan should have told Chinese, "We are not present there currently. It's an uninhabited territory. But soon we will establish our posts there because it is part of J&K. Hence you should keep out."

- PRTP GWD

 

[Sal12]

Pakistan never controlled Shaksgam valley. Pakistanis were never present there. But it was still part of J&K. Pakistan should have told Chinese, "We are not present there currently. It's an uninhabited territory. But soon we will establish our posts there because it is part of J&K. Hence you should keep out."

- PRTP GWD

Most part of Aksi Chin was always in custody of China. Did you get Aksi Chin in 72 years. No. Was it not better for India to negotiate with China and settle its border at least in J & K sector and you will get some territory from China in border settlement rather calling Aksi Chin as COK for 72 years.

What Pak would have achieved by calling Shaksgam valley as COK and don't increase its territory it received from China.

 

[xeuss]

Pakistan never controlled Shaksgam valley. Pakistanis were never present there. But it was still part of J&K. Pakistan should have told Chinese, "We are not present there currently. It's an uninhabited territory. But soon we will establish our posts there because it is part of J&K. Hence you should keep out."

- PRTP GWD

Pakistan had every right to negotiate with China, as they inherited the state of Hunza.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Pakistan never controlled Shaksgam valley. Pakistanis were never present there. But it was still part of J&K. Pakistan should have told Chinese, "We are not present there currently. It's an uninhabited territory. But soon we will establish our posts there because it is part of J&K. Hence you should keep out."

- PRTP GWD

We exchanged nothing but got more territory in exchange for recognising chinese sovereignty from China.. win win for us.

Next in IOK, which will be freed one day or another.. by hook or by crook!

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Pakistan had every right to negotiate with China, as they inherited the state of Hunza.

When did Pakistan inherit Hunza? It is still part of J&K.

- PRTP GWD

 

[xeuss]

When did Pakistan inherit Hunza? It is still part of J&K.

- PRTP GWD

Sorry. I didn't know you lacked comprehension skills.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Sorry. I didn't know you lacked comprehension skills.

Occupying a territory is not the same as inheritance. J&K Maharaja signed the instrument of accession with India not Pakistan. I didn't know you can't comprehend the difference.

- PRTP GWD

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

Shaksgam Valley

K2 and Gasherbrum North Face In China - Shaksgam Valley To Gasherbrum North Base Camp

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Most part of Aksi Chin was always in custody of China. Did you get Aksi Chin in 72 years. No. Was it not better for India to negotiate with China and settle its border at least in J & K sector and you will get some territory from China in border settlement rather calling Aksi Chin as COK for 72 years.

What Pak would have achieved by calling Shaksgam valley as COK and don't increase its territory it received from China.

Pakistan could have defended Shaksgam valley. That way it would have had more land. In fact Ayub Khan had warned Chinese when they were making incursions.

- PRTP GWD

 

[Sal12]

Pakistan could have defended Shaksgam valley. That way it would have had more land. In fact Ayub Khan had warned Chinese when they were making incursions.

- PRTP GWD

I already answered you.

Pak too would have agreed for keeping Laddakh and Jammu in Indian's hand if Indian agreed to give Kashmir valley to Pak and this whole issue would have done and dusted long ago. Every one knows Kashmiris hate Indian rule and Kashmir valley is very small as opposed to Laddakh but even then India is not willing to leave valley.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Occupying a territory is not the same as inheritance. J&K Maharaja signed the instrument of accession with India not Pakistan. I didn't know you can't comprehend the difference.

- PRTP GWD

and GB never ever be part of J&K in history, you Indiot

PRTP GWD

 

[TNT]

Pakistan never controlled Shaksgam valley. Pakistanis were never present there. But it was still part of J&K. Pakistan should have told Chinese, "We are not present there currently. It's an uninhabited territory. But soon we will establish our posts there because it is part of J&K. Hence you should keep out."

- PRTP GWD

Well actually we are not idiots and do things maturely. It was an uninhabited land and looking at our sincerity the chinese gave away much land to us too. It made the basis for our strong and trust based relationship with china. Now china is even ready to let us have laddakh.

 

[xeuss]

Occupying a territory is not the same as inheritance. J&K Maharaja signed the instrument of accession with India not Pakistan. I didn't know you can't comprehend the difference.

- PRTP GWD

Maharaja of J&K never controlled Hunza or its territories.

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

Shaksgam valley.

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram