What's new

Shaheen VII Train Together Fight Together (Video)

Yeah Thank that's what I talking they Still unable to meet the specification of F-22 which was made by US 30 years(half a century)ago @pakistanipower
Dude the likes of Russia, Britain, Germany and France started making military jets much earlier than China but do they boast of same technology which China is developing, besides every aircraft has it's plus and minus.

''Compared with the US's fifth-generation fighter jets, the F-22 and the F-35, the J-20 has "longer range, more internal fuel capacity, and larger internal weapons capability," Bronk said.

This combination of factors presents a real risk to US forces in the Pacific. Long-range, capable strike fighters like the J-20 put the US AWACS, or airborne warning and control system, as well as "refueling tankers, and forward bases at risk much more than current types if flying in relatively large numbers" should any kind of kinetic conflict flare up in the Pacific, Bronk said.''
 
.
@pakistanipower
Don't act like lunatic
Dude the likes of Russia, Britain, Germany and France started making military jets much earlier than China but do they boast of same technology which China is developing, besides every aircraft has it's plus and minus.

''Compared with the US's fifth-generation fighter jets, the F-22 and the F-35, the J-20 has "longer range, more internal fuel capacity, and larger internal weapons capability," Bronk said.

This combination of factors presents a real risk to US forces in the Pacific. Long-range, capable strike fighters like the J-20 put the US AWACS, or airborne warning and control system, as well as "refueling tankers, and forward bases at risk much more than current types if flying in relatively large numbers" should any kind of kinetic conflict flare up in the Pacific, Bronk said.''
You are right Sir.
 
.
F-22 is developed by NASA as X-22.
Hope you understand what NASA is capable to do.They reached moon in 1969.No other country Still not capable to do this.
It is the most maneuverable plane in the whole world.Its whole Body acts like a sensor.and why are you acting like a Chinese slave and reporting me?
Don't act like Chinese Slave.
And be real kid F-22 not develop X-22 correct your information its develop from YF-22 from ATF competition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_YF-22 @JohnWick :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Tactical_Fighter
And this is X-22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-22
i am not a Chinese slave but your'e US tattu slave @JohnWick :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: only USA have the advantage that THEY HAVE VAST EXPERIENCE IN AVIATION FEILDS @JohnWick your post against reported for your baseless troll @JohnWick be real kid @JohnWick :crazy::crazy::crazy:

@pakistanipower
Don't act like lunatic
You're worst than lunatic @JohnWick
 
.
And be real kid F-22 not develop X-22 correct your information its develop from YF-22 from ATF competition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_YF-22 @JohnWick :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Tactical_Fighter
And this is X-22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-22
i am not a Chinese slave but your'e US tattu slave @JohnWick :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: only USA have the advantage that THEY HAVE VAST EXPERIENCE IN AVIATION FEILDS @JohnWick your post against reported for your baseless troll @JohnWick be real kid @JohnWick :crazy::crazy::crazy:


You're worst than lunatic @JohnWick
Hahaha Sir its YF-22 instead of X-22 my fault but sorry to say
Boing,NASA,lookheed Martin Northrop Have Same roots and also NASA tests and modifies all these planes.
 
.
Hahaha Sir its YF-22 instead of X-22 my fault but sorry to say
Boing,NASA,lookheed Martin Northrop Have Same roots and also NASA tests and modifies all these planes.
yo don't even know the basic of flight and called yourself an expert, do you know what is leading/trailing edge flaprons, do you know what is ailerons, do you know what is Fowler flaps, do you know what is LREX and do you know what is canard and how its worked, modern military tech was copied/developed from captured ww2 German tech like First jet engine JAMBO 003, first Ballistic missiles V-2, First flying wing design was rocket powerd Horten Ho-229, first operational jet fighter Me-262 etc etc @JohnWick
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
 
.
What was supposed to be good informational thread has turned sour
because of this juvenile bickering.
 
. .
Elaborate pls?


Some diff in electronic suit and engine Blk 60 is a beast . J 10Cs electronic package is unknown that's why I said blk52+

Only AESA radar make J-10C superior to any non AESA fighter jet, as the radar is itself very capable against EW systems, now add Chinese DAS to it which give 360 degree coverage in passive mode, one must remember that J-10C have tech of J-20 so it will be on par with block-70 if not better.
 
.
Only AESA radar make J-10C superior to any non AESA fighter jet, as the radar is itself very capable against EW systems, now add Chinese DAS to it which give 360 degree coverage in passive mode, one must remember that J-10C have tech of J-20 so it will be on par with block-70 if not better.
And Paf knows much more about J 10C that's why they are about to purchase them :D
 
. . .
48411191_1926295714144380_8098541173141929984_n.jpg
 
.
This ex maybe a prime example of how a defence pact looks like.

Movement of all US product allowed through US permission. Strict control from US.

These new mission computers are all monitored remotely. Maybe of us conspire that they will not be able to fly when we send them against a real raid.
 
. .
Only AESA radar make J-10C superior to any non AESA fighter jet, as the radar is itself very capable against EW systems, now add Chinese DAS to it which give 360 degree coverage in passive mode, one must remember that J-10C have tech of J-20 so it will be on par with block-70 if not better.
But surely you need to take into account the loitering time,the CFTs, The engine characteristics, maturity of its hardware and software, better thrust, better quality of armaments. I agree that the factors you have mentioned make the J10C a worthy opponent but does it better the 16??? I think maybe at par.
A
 
.
Back
Top Bottom