What's new

Sensitive Data of Indian Navy’s Scorpene Class Submarines Leaked

yes leak must be plugged but here is the pic of some folders and content


View attachment 328353

All these are manuals.. Individually these folders also contain the same manuals..

The way i see it, either in France or in India a subcontractor or a IN official who handles training and documentation or anyone who is preparing these doc set for India might have a copy and is perhaps the source of the leak.. That number will be narrow and eventually we will find the culprit..


But again as far as contents of these manuals are concerned like this page
View attachment 328354

its a normal manual of how system work and is like a hands on training for a new operator ..

Arrey Yaar..The newspaper has released the least sensitive stuff cos-

Case is under investigation
It has implications on national security of Australia, USA, India and others..

2nd - what use is plugging the leak? All those who have means have already gained access once the material left DCNS. For gods sake - a newspaper has them so is it a stretch to imagine other interested parties wont have them? Look at how DCNS are trying to pin the whole thing on India by saying Australia is safe cos leak didn't happen on their project - No word about implications for India..

What do you suggest should happen to DCNS? Shouldn't it be penalized? If so, how?
 
.
yes leak must be plugged but here is the pic of some folders and content


View attachment 328353

All these are manuals.. Individually these folders also contain the same manuals..

The way i see it, either in France or in India a subcontractor or a IN official who handles training and documentation or anyone who is preparing these doc set for India might have a copy and is perhaps the source of the leak.. That number will be narrow and eventually we will find the culprit..

But again as far as contents of these manuals are concerned like this page
View attachment 328354

its a normal manual of how system work and is like a hands on training for a new operator ..

Cool .......... since these are worthless let us also release manuals about our Nuclear submarine too. :lol:

BTW the "culprit" has already been identified. "Formal Naval officer who at that time was DCS sub contractor" (obviously french)
 
.
isi...........mowaahahahahah.
ok jokes over. but if the data was leaked and an aussie paper got it then what are the chances your western neighbour has said data too? just a thought.

besides sleep well india they have the diesal engines not the drdo aip. i doubt the french have the specs for the aip? right @PARIKRAMA ?
 
. . .
Arrey Yaar..The newspaper has released the least sensitive stuff cos-

Case is under investigation
It has implications on national security of Australia, USA, India and others..

2nd - what use is plugging the leak? All those who have means have already gained access once the material left DCNS. For gods sake - a newspaper has them so is it a stretch to imagine other interested parties wont have them? Look at how DCNS are trying to pin the whole thing on India by saying Australia is safe cos leak didn't happen on their project - No word about implications for India..

What do you suggest should happen to DCNS? Shouldn't it penalized? If so, how?
Enquiry would happen and if found culprit its banning for minimum 10 years,,

Cool .......... since these are worthless let us also release manuals about our Nuclear submarine too. :lol:

BTW the "culprit" has already been identified. "Formal Naval officer who at that time was DCS sub contractor" (obviously french)
Pls do go ahead and release it if you also want to make some quick money.. No one says its correct.. not even me.. but manuals dont give out the sensitive portion as claimed by the newspaper..

Its the source of the leak which is important to find bcz what he might have sold out may turn out to be drop in the ocean.. What other data he has is far more important to find..

isi...........mowaahahahahah.
ok jokes over. but if the data was leaked and an aussie paper got it then what are the chances your western neighbour has said data too? just a thought.

besides sleep well india they have the diesal engines not the drdo aip. i doubt the french have the specs for the aip? right @PARIKRAMA ?
The whole world will have it.. as is said its the tip of the iceberg or dop in ocean.. what that person also has besides these manuals is far more important..

From a similar perspective agosta manuals will be similar to these manuals.. Pakistan wont find much new in that.. nor will china who would have already got the same via Pakistan as i believe their cooperation level is much higher.
 
.
here they are..... or part of it
its everywhere so no point trying to hide something thats out
 

Attachments

  • secret-submarine-dossier-document-1.pdf
    556.2 KB · Views: 469
  • secret-submarine-dossier-document-2.pdf
    131.1 KB · Views: 281
.
If only people know whats written really

First the article

++++
Our French submarine builder in massive leak scandal
6d9e2c4b1e80751b6b284ad616e5a032

The Indian Navy’s first Scorpene submarine in Mumbai last year.

The French company that won the bid to design Australia’s new $50 billion submarine fleet has suffered a massive leak of secret documents, raising fears about the future security of top-secret data on the navy’s future fleet.

The stunning leak, which runs to 22,400 pages and has been seen by The Australian, details the entire secret combat capability of the six Scorpene-class submarines that French shipbuilder DCNS has designed for the Indian Navy.

A variant of the same French-designed Scorpene is also used by the navies of Malaysia, Chile and, from 2018, Brazil, so news of the Edward Snowden-sized leak — revealed today — will trigger alarm at the highest level in these countries. Marked “Restricted Scorpene India”, the DCNS documents detail the most sensitive combat capabilities of India’s new $US3 bn ($3.9bn) submarine fleet and would provide an intelligence bonanza if obtained by India’s strategic rivals, such as Pakistan or China.

The leak will spark grave concern in Australia and especially in the US where senior navy officials have privately expressed fears about the security of top-secret data entrusted to France.

In April DCNS, which is two-thirds owned by the French government, won the hotly contested bid over Germany and Japan to design 12 new submarines for Australia. Its proposed submarine for Australia — the yet-to-be-built Shortfin Barracuda — was chosen ahead of its rivals because it was considered to be the quietest in the water, making it perfectly suited to intelligence-gathering operations against China and others in the region.

Any stealth advantage for the navy’s new submarines would be gravely compromised if data on its planned combat and performance capabilities was leaked in the same manner as the data from the Scorpene. The leaked DCNS data details the secret stealth capabilities of the six new Indian submarines, including what frequencies they gather intelligence at, what levels of noise they make at various speeds and their diving depths, range and endurance — all sensitive information that is highly classified. The data tells the submarine crew where on the boat they can speak safely to avoid detection by the enemy. It also discloses magnetic, electromagnetic and infra-red data as well as the specifications of the submarine’s torpedo launch system and the combat system.

It details the speed and conditions needed for using the periscope, the noise specifications of the propeller and the radiated noise levels that occur when the submarine surfaces.

The data seen by The Australian includes 4457 pages on the submarine’s underwater sensors, 4209 pages on its above-water sensors, 4301 pages on its combat management system, 493 pages on its torpedo launch system and specifications, 6841 pages on the sub’s communications system and 2138 on its navigation systems.

The Australian has chosen to redact sensitive information from the documents.

Sea trials for the first of India’s six Scorpene submarines began in May. The project is running four years behind schedule.

The Indian Navy has boasted that its Scorpene submarines have superior stealth features, which give them a major advantage against other submarines.

The US will be alarmed by the leak of the DCNS data because Australia hopes to install an American combat system — with the latest US stealth technology — in the French Shortfin Barracuda.

If Washington does not feel confident that its “crown jewels’’ of stealth technology can be protected, it may decline to give Australia its state-of-the-art combat system.

DCNS yesterday sought to reassure Australians that the leak of the data on the Indian Scorpene submarine would not happen with its proposed submarine for Australia. The company also implied — but did not say directly — that the leak might have occurred at India’s end, rather than from France. “Uncontrolled technical data is not possible in the Australian arrangements,” the company said. “Multiple and independent controls exist within DCNS to prevent unauthorised access to data and all data movements are encrypted and recorded. In the case of India, where a DCNS design is built by a local company, DCNS is the provider and not the controller of technical data.

“In the case of Australia, and unlike India, DCNS is both the provider and in-country controller of technical data for the full chain of transmission and usage over the life of the submarines.”

However, The Australian has been told that the data on the Scorpene was written in France for India in 2011 and is suspected of being removed from France in that same year by a former French Navy officer who was at that time a DCNS subcontractor.

The data is then believed to have been taken to a company in Southeast Asia, possibly to assist in a commercial venture for a regional navy.

It was subsequently passed by a third party to a second company in the region before being sent on a data disk by regular mail to a company in Australia. It is unclear how widely the data has been shared in Asia or whether it has been obtained by foreign intelligence agencies.

The data seen by The Australian also includes separate confidential DCNS files on plans to sell French frigates to Chile and the French sale of the Mistral-class amphibious assault ship carrier to Russia. These DCNS projects have no link to India, which adds weight to the probability that the data files were removed from DCNS in France.


DCNS Australia this month signed a deed of agreement with the Defence Department, paving the way for talks over the contract which will guide the design phase of the new submarines. The government plans to build 12 submarines in Adelaide to replace the six-boat Collins-class fleet from the early 2030s. The Shortfin Barracuda will be a slightly shorter, conventionally powered version of France’s new fleet of Barracuda-class nuclear submarines.

Restricted data

The secret information the leaked documents reveal:

• The stealth capabilities of the six new Indian Scorpene submarines
• The frequencies at which the subs gather intelligence
• The levels of noise the subs make at various speeds
• Diving depths, range and endurance
• Magnetic, electromagnetic and infra-red data
• Specifications of the submarine’s torpedo launch system and the combat system
• Speed and conditions needed for using the periscope
• Propeller’s noise specifications
• Radiated noise levels when the submarine surfaces
++++

Whats the data leaked really and whats the preview the newspaper gave out..

View attachment 328351

thats the cover of 1st PDF it has attached to showcase reference

What do you expect technical manuals to have within? Of course technical side of how to operate and troubleshoot basic things..

Buy any electronic device even an apple iphone, wont you get technical manuals? yes a repair guy would have more detailed circuit board level stuff but that is for trouble shooting.. and Manuals dont have circuits.. its basically process of how to operate and what to do in case its a trouble/issue.. teh flowchart of steps really.. not for building a sub with details of metallurgy or so called other technological stuff which can be replicated..

the second pdf talks about acoustic noise under certain conditions (lol sea state 1 meaning super calm bright sunny weather with no problems) noise levels in different compartment. Smartass folks forget the sub testing is done to check acoustic noise seen within individual compartments during sea trials to see if build of the sub matches with the laid out details or not and thus acoustic noise is measured for each portion in different conditions. So if we measure X, will not be there a reference to check and say yes it conforms to the build quality as laid and contracted by DCNS with GOI.. These are called as guaranteed noise levels... anything beyond those levels and sub goes back to do more insulation and may not get quality certification iuf consistently it breaches those guaranteed stuff for anything and everything..

the third part and biggest chunk, comprising of 2342 pages and are actually documentation manual of the parts and training documents.

In simple words, if i get documentation manuals, technical manuals and training manuals can i build scorpene sub? Can i reverse engineer it? Can i compromise, cripple and make scorpene sub useless?

Its height of stupidity really.. yes someone leaked but again its not really the core critical stuff.. We must plug the leak source but The Australian is using the vested interest angle to rub DCNS in a wrong way.. The way it is, its clear they dont want DCNS to ink the contract of SEA1000. Perhaps this might turn out to be a case of yellow journalism with intentional espionage and leakage by Rivals of DCNS.

As far as India is concerned, these manuals are written in 2010-2011.. Kalavari is on sea trials now.. You know even for LCA tejas there will be 5000 pages of technical manuals.. its for pilots training, for basic repair crew etc.. same its for sailors and crew.. Nothing so sensitive is shared in manuals in the first place.. mostly the doc set of captain may have sensitive some frequencies for communication but that is never going to be shared with normal manuals nor codes for torpedo launch or sensitive Battle Management system codes etc..

This is a clear case of poor attempt to drag a company to score brownie points (Anti Turnbull group) and use DCNS and India names to glorify the case and grab eyeballs.. Thats my assessment after going through the prelim data ..


Tagging the whole world.. its time such news items are given the right place.. sensationalism at its best..

@Abingdonboy @anant_s @Taygibay @Picdelamirand-oil @Vergennes @randomradio @Ankit Kumar 002 @MilSpec @Koovie @Echo_419 @Dash @hellfire @ito @SR-91 @AMCA @DesiGuy1403 @ranjeet @hellfire @fsayed @SpArK @AUSTERLITZ @nair @proud_indian @Roybot @jbgt90 @Sergi @Water Car Engineer @dadeechi @kurup @Rain Man @kaykay @Joe Shearer @Tshering22 @Dandpatta @danger007 @Didact @Soumitra @SrNair @TejasMk3@jbgt90 @ranjeet @4GTejasBVR @The_Showstopper @guest11 @egodoc222 @Nilgiri @SarthakGanguly @Omega007 @GURU DUTT @HariPrasad @JanjaWeed @litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular @Spectre@litefire @AMCA @Perpendicular@Ryuzaki @CorporateAffairs @GR!FF!N @migflug @Levina@SvenSvensonov @-xXx- @Perpendicular @proud_indian @Mustang06 @Param @Local_Legend @Ali Zadi @hellfire @egodoc222 @CorporateAffairs @Major Shaitan Singh @jha @SmilingBuddha @#hydra# @danish_vij @[Bregs] @Skillrex @Hephaestus @SR-91 @Techy @litefire @R!CK @zebra7 @dev_moh @DesiGuy1403 @itachii @nik141993 @Marxist @Glorino @noksss @jbgt90 @Skull and Bones @Kraitcorp @Crixus @waz @WAJsal @Oscar @Blue Marlin @jhungary @AugenBlick @Star Wars @GuardianRED @arp2041 @Aero @Penguin @others
This is what I really like about your posts and reply. Always to the point and precise.

Din't pakistan navy buy Agostas from DCS ? :lol: ............ how safe are your secretes ? DCS reputation does not inspire much confidence.
yeah but the sorpene class has been leaked not its blueprints. Plus the above mentioned subs are going for heavy modernisation in Turkey
 
.
Enquiry would happen and if found culprit its banning for minimum 10 years,,

There goes our plan to induct 3 more kalavri :p:


Pls do go ahead and release it if you also want to make some quick money.. No one says its correct.. not even me.. but manuals dont give out the sensitive portion as claimed by the newspaper..

Its the source of the leak which is important to find bcz what he might have sold out may turn out to be drop in the ocean.. What other data he has is far more important to find..

I have written/ reviewed /approved/ my fair share of manuals for the IAF and IN to know they contain lots of stuff that needs to be kept out of the hands of enemies.

However you are ASSUMING ALL these are Manuals. Reminds me of an ostrich with head in the sand.

If wishes were horses, ...............

If he had any other data he has illegally obtained, only an idiot would think he has not already sold it. Why else does one steal data ? :cheesy:
 
Last edited:
.
Enquiry would happen and if found culprit its banning for minimum 10 years,,


Pls do go ahead and release it if you also want to make some quick money.. No one says its correct.. not even me.. but manuals dont give out the sensitive portion as claimed by the newspaper..

Its the source of the leak which is important to find bcz what he might have sold out may turn out to be drop in the ocean.. What other data he has is far more important to find..


The whole world will have it.. as is said its the tip of the iceberg or dop in ocean.. what that person also has besides these manuals is far more important..

From a similar perspective agosta manuals will be similar to these manuals.. Pakistan wont find much new in that.. nor will china who would have already got the same via Pakistan as i believe their cooperation level is much higher.
the agosta is compleatly differant from the scorpene?
they said the leak was likely from the indian side. what are the chances that if these docs are "leaked" what else would have got out? nobody knows but its just a thought.
the french are too professional to just leak out such info.
i think this was leaked on purpose to sabotage the deal or delay it big time.

as for china and pakistan lets not go there, you guys are not exactly independant in your nuclear sub. but thats for another thread.
 
.
yeah but the sorpene class has been leaked not its blueprints. Plus the above mentioned subs are going for heavy modernisation in Turkey

What makes you think that when DCS was so careless with data about sorpene, it would have been the same for Agosta ? if I was a betting man, I would bet my last dollar that DCS has "leaked" all kinds of sensitive information.
 
.
the agosta is compleatly differant from the scorpene?
they said the leak was likely from the indian side. what are the chances that if these docs are "leaked" what else would have got out? nobody knows but its just a thought.
the french are too professional to just leak out such info.
i think this was leaked on purpose to sabotage the deal or delay it big time.

as for china and pakistan lets not go there, you guys are not exactly independant in your nuclear sub. but thats for another thread.
Corporate espionage, buying out an insider, anti turnbull group, pure lucration of money.. many or any factor(s) may be there..

Agosta was comparison for manuals nothing else..
 
.
the agosta is compleatly differant from the scorpene?
they said the leak was likely from the indian side. what are the chances that if these docs are "leaked" what else would have got out? nobody knows but its just a thought.
the french are too professional to just leak out such info.
i think this was leaked on purpose to sabotage the deal or delay it big time.

as for china and pakistan lets not go there, you guys are not exactly independant in your nuclear sub. but thats for another thread.

Couple of things

Not leaked but stolen by French Naval Officer/contractor for monetary gain as mentioned in article. That is why Australia and USA are concerned. If Scorpene info can be stolen then what else?

DCNS will loose lot of potential business including the giant Australian contract, so they are trying to deflect blame to India as Indian contract is done and they have received major portion of payment. So nothing to loose there as India is already stuck with them as all six scorpenes are under different stages of construction/induction.
 
.
What makes you think that when DCS was so careless with data about sorpene, it would have been the same for Agosta
That is what @PARIKRAMA is trying to tell. The info, even which is leaked is just a manual. On how to operate and what not. You cannot exactly replicate a who sub out of it. Though, at best you might be able to get few points on its capacities and limitation, other than that, rest is B.S

Couple of things

Not leaked but stolen by French Naval Officer/contractor for monetary gain as mentioned in article. That is why Australia and USA are concerned. If Scorpene info can be stolen then what else?

DCNS will loose lot of potential business including the giant Australian contract, so they are trying to deflect blame to India as Indian contract is done and they have received major portion of payment. So nothing to loose there as India is already stuck with them as all six scorpenes are under different stages of construction/induction.

India is already not very happy with rafael drama the french created and now this. I sincerely believe if they try to shift the blame on Indians ( which is very stupid, since why would they leak it ) Then Frenchies can kiss goodbye to any major future procurements from france

@Taygibay Bro. We really need few answers if you can dig em out
 
.
the agosta is compleatly differant from the scorpene?
they said the leak was likely from the indian side. what are the chances that if these docs are "leaked" what else would have got out? nobody knows but its just a thought.
the french are too professional to just leak out such info.
i think this was leaked on purpose to sabotage the deal or delay it big time.

as for china and pakistan lets not go there, you guys are not exactly independant in your nuclear sub. but thats for another thread.

The French are Famous for leaking information.

They leaked it during the Falklands wars and betrayed Argentina. :agree:

They leaked NATO air strike war plans to serbs. :P

They betrayed Russia over Mistral.

Now this.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom