What's new

Self-consciousness of the Reality and Oneness of Being. Ibn Al-Arabi’s wisdom of Divinity.

Ace of Spades

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
1,465
Reaction score
30
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
The term "origin" is meaningless without assuming the existence of what is "originated," and so on with all polar concepts, including the terms "God" and "Lord," which are significant only if the corresponding terms "worshiper" and "slave" are implied

The Reality gave existence to the whole Cosmos [at first] as an undifferentiated thing without anything of the spirit in it, so that it was like an unpolished mirror.

The Reality wanted to see His own Essence, in an all-inclusive object encompassing the whole [divine] Command, which, qualified by existence, would reveal to Him His own mystery. For the seeing of a thing, itself by itself, is not the same as its seeing itself in another, as it were in a mirror.

Al Arabi R.A describes it like a highly polished metal mirror. To begin with, such mirrors had to be kept polished in order to preserve their reflective qualities and, furthermore, it required great skill by the craftsman to make a perfectly flat surface. With such a mirror, therefore, there was always the possibility of surface deterioration and distortion. Thus, so long as the mirror was perfectly polished and flat, the observing subject might see his own form or image perfectly reflected on its surface, in which case the otherness of the mirror itself is reduced to a minimum in the observing consciousness, or even effaced completely. To the extent, however, that the mirror reflects a dulled or distorted image, it manifests its own otherness and detracts from the identity of image and subject. Indeed, the distorted and imperfect image presents something alien to the subject, who then may become involved in efforts to improve and perfect the mirror, so that he might achieve a more perfect self-consciousness. Thus, in the mirror we have a very apt symbol of the divine-cosmic polarity. At one extreme of the relationship cosmic Nature threatens to absorb and assimilate the subject in the infinity and complexity of his creative urge, while, at the other, the divine Subject seems to annihilate Nature in the reassertion of identity, each being, at once, another and non-other.

In this image, man is seen as the seal that seals and protects the cosmic treasure house of God and on which is stamped the signet of its Owner.

God unites the polarity of qualities only in Adam, to confer a distinction on him. Thus, He says to Shaitan, What prevents you from prostrating to one whom I have created with my two hands? What prevents Shaitan is the very fact that he [man] unites [in himself] the two modes, the [originated] Cosmos and the [originating and original] Reality, which are His two hands. As for Shaitan, he is only a part of the Cosmos and has no share in this Synthesis, by virtue of which Adam is the Regent. Were he not manifest [in the Cosmos] in the form of Him Whom he represents, he would not be the Regent, and were he not to comprise all that his dependent charges require or were he unable to meet all their requirements, he would not be the Regent. In short, the Regency is fitting only for the Perfect Man.

His outer form He composed of the cosmic realities and forms, while his inner form He composed to match His Own form. Thus He says in the Sacred Tradition, "I am his hearing and his sight," and not, "I am his eye and his ear," in order to show the distinction between the two forms [the imperceptible and the perceptible]. Likewise He is [implicit] in every cosmic being according as the essential reality [manifested] in that being requires it, providing it is understood that no other being enjoys the Synthesis [of divine realities] possessed by the Regent. It is only by virtue of this Synthesis that he is superior [to all other beings].

Adam is that single soul, that single spiritual essence from which humankind was created, as He says, 0 Men, fear your Lord Who created you from a single soul and created from it its mate, so that from them both there issued forth many men and women. His saying Fear your Lord means "Make your outer [transient] selves a protection for your Lord [your inner essential reality], and make your inner [reality], which is your Lord, a protection for your outer selves."

Extracts from his book "The bezels of wisdom"

@Slav Defence @Mangus Ortus Novem @jaibi @PakSword @SIPRA @H. Dawary
 
Last edited:
. .
The term "origin" is meaningless without assuming the existence of what is "originated," and so on with all polar concepts, including the terms "God" and "Lord," which are significant only if the corresponding terms "worshiper" and "slave" are implied

The Reality gave existence to the whole Cosmos [at first] as an undifferentiated thing without anything of the spirit in it, so that it was like an unpolished mirror.

The Reality wanted to see His own Essence, in an all-inclusive object encompassing the whole [divine] Command, which, qualified by existence, would reveal to Him His own mystery. For the seeing of a thing, itself by itself, is not the same as its seeing itself in another, as it were in a mirror.

Al Arabi R.A describes it like a highly polished metal mirror. To begin with, such mirrors had to be kept polished in order to preserve their reflective qualities and, furthermore, it required great skill by the craftsman to make a perfectly flat surface. With such a mirror, therefore, there was always the possibility of surface deterioration and distortion. Thus, so long as the mirror was perfectly polished and flat, the observing subject might see his own form or image perfectly reflected on its surface, in which case the otherness of the mirror itself is reduced to a minimum in the observing consciousness, or even effaced completely. To the extent, however, that the mirror reflects a dulled or distorted image, it manifests its own otherness and detracts from the identity of image and subject. Indeed, the distorted and imperfect image presents something alien to the subject, who then may become involved in efforts to improve and perfect the mirror, so that he might achieve a more perfect self-consciousness. Thus, in the mirror we have a very apt symbol of the divine-cosmic polarity. At one extreme of the relationship cosmic Nature threatens to absorb and assimilate the subject in the infinity and complexity of his creative urge, while, at the other, the divine Subject seems to annihilate Nature in the reassertion of identity, each being, at once, another and non-other.

In this image, man is seen as the seal that seals and protects the cosmic treasure house of God and on which is stamped the signet of its Owner.

God unites the polarity of qualities only in Adam, to confer a distinction on him. Thus, He says to Shaitan, What prevents you from prostrating to one whom I have created with my two hands? What prevents Shaitan is the very fact that he [man] unites [in himself] the two modes, the [originated] Cosmos and the [originating and original] Reality, which are His two hands. As for Shaitan, he is only a part of the Cosmos and has no share in this Synthesis, by virtue of which Adam is the Regent. Were he not manifest [in the Cosmos] in the form of Him Whom he represents, he would not be the Regent, and were he not to comprise all that his dependent charges require or were he unable to meet all their requirements, he would not be the Regent. In short, the Regency is fitting only for the Perfect Man.

His outer form He composed of the cosmic realities and forms, while his inner form He composed to match His Own form. Thus He says in the Sacred Tradition, "I am his hearing and his sight," and not, "I am his eye and his ear," in order to show the distinction between the two forms [the imperceptible and the perceptible]. Likewise He is [implicit] in every cosmic being according as the essential reality [manifested] in that being requires it, providing it is understood that no other being enjoys the Synthesis [of divine realities] possessed by the Regent. It is only by virtue of this Synthesis that he is superior [to all other beings].

Adam is that single soul, that single spiritual essence from which humankind was created, as He says, 0 Men, fear your Lord Who created you from a single soul and created from it its mate, so that from them both there issued forth many men and women. His saying Fear your Lord means "Make your outer [transient] selves a protection for your Lord [your inner essential reality], and make your inner [reality], which is your Lord, a protection for your outer selves."

Extracts from his book "The bezels of wisdom"

@Slav Defence @Mangus Ortus Novem @jaibi @PakSword @SIPRA @H. Dawary

Very beautiful brother, please tag me in your next thread on similar topics. I have a deep interest in Sufism and metaphysics.

Indeed, he speaks truth. What he says is the divine part of the human being is the Ruh, from which Allah swt put something of Himself in us (we do not know exactly what.) This part of the human being ascribes to goodness and virtue, and is fully obedient to Allah swt. The Arwah (Ruhs) were housed in a specific place before being put into the created body, that is where Adam AS looked out and saw them all, remarking about the shining ones, who were prophets, and the most radiant one, which was Rasulullah SAWS.

The outer shell of the human being is the physical created body which houses the Nafs, the wicked and animalistic part of the human. It is vulnerable to the whispers of Shaytaan. It aspires to physical desires, appetites, riches, etc. without regards to the laws of Allah swt's morality. When Adam AS was created and was a simple hollowed form for many eons, Shaytaan would remark at his form and wonder about him, what kind of creature will this be.

In this delicate balance between Ruh and Nafs, the human being finds himself constantly being pulled in both directions, forever at war with himself until death. Depending on his personal decisions in life, he gets elevated to a status above angels, or falls to a lowly station below even animals.
 
.
Many people argue on the Sufism but honestly as long as, it doesn’t promote hate but the harmony, its all cool.
He is also known as father of Sufism.
FEB081AE-A3EA-4AEA-9E7B-F9B4822E652E.jpeg
038723BD-4BAC-4BDF-81F7-F4ED00E28873.jpeg
32F285A6-D9D5-48F7-8D8F-C793D1D80563.jpeg
D6FD2C5C-60AA-42BD-9F1E-9DB4E224864F.jpeg
 
. .
I will do that; i will be posting more around similar topics.

Thanks brother. This is an excellent initiative which you have undertaken.

It will purify many hearts in this holy month, and you will gain all rewards from it. It will improve our understanding of our faith at a deeper level.

May Allah swt bless you.
 
. .
Religious discussions are not allowed.

This is more around philosophical paradigm. At least that's how i interpret it, if it's not then @WebMaster can lemme know.

Thanks brother. This is an excellent initiative which you have undertaken.

It will purify many hearts in this holy month, and you will gain all rewards from it. It will improve our understanding of our faith at a deeper level.

May Allah swt bless you.

Thanks brother; appreciate your kind words.
 
.
This is more around philosophical paradigm. At least that's how i interpret it, if it's not then @WebMaster can lemme know.

You cannot separate philosophy from religion.

The whole thread is loaded with religious references and quite inviting indeed.

The concept under discussion is prevalent in all religion, traditions and cultures. From the Mayans to the Bantu people to Mongolian Shamans.
 
.
You cannot separate philosophy from religion.

The whole thread is loaded with religious references and quite inviting indeed.

The concept under discussion is prevalent in all religion, traditions and cultures. From the Mayans to the Bantu people to Mongolian Shamans.

Which would always be the case in any philosophical discussion; the question is what do people want to discuss here? Just look the threads and the topics that are being opened and discussed every day, except for trolling do you learn anything out of them?
 
.
Which would always be the case, in any philosophical discussion; the question is what do people want to discuss here? Just look the threads and the topics that are being opened and discussed every day, except for trolling do you learn anything out of them?

people do come here with a premeditated view of most topics or threads that open. it gives them chance to learn to present their arguments in different ways than just one and now you can add 2 into two to know why religious discussions are not promoted on the forum.

There exists already a library for quotes, documentaries and other media
 
.
people do come here with a premeditated view of most topics or threads that open. it gives them chance to learn to present their arguments in different ways than just one and now you can add 2 into two to know why religious discussions are not promoted on the forum.

There exists already a library for quotes, documentaries and other media

I, personally, like to expand my ideas. Hence, this thread and topic. Now i understand the reasoning behind having no religious discussion on the forum and i won't insist on it if this, OP, falls in to similar category. But again if we start doing that then no philosophical discussion is possible. In one way or the other it can and will always be interlinked with any religion. I have already tagged webmaster, and he can lemme know what he thinks of it.

@Slav Defence @WebMaster
 
. .
I, personally, like to expand my ideas. Hence, this thread and topic. Now i understand the reasoning behind having no religious discussion on the forum and i won't insist on it if this, OP, falls in to similar category. But again if we start doing that then no philosophical discussion is possible. In one way or the other it can and will always be interlinked with any religion. I have already tagged webmaster, and he can lemme know what he thinks of it.

I, personally, like to expand my ideas. Hence, this thread and topic. Now i understand the reasoning behind having no religious discussion on the forum and i won't insist on it if this, OP, falls in to similar category. But again if we start doing that then no philosophical discussion is possible. In one way or the other it can and will always be interlinked with any religion. I have already tagged webmaster, and he can lemme know what he thinks of it.

@Slav Defence @WebMaster

watch this to expand it to the 5th dimension
 
.
Nefs is here to stay with the human being till his/her death!!! Nefs makes human beings to go for the easy and immediate attainments of pleasure, which turns out to be illicit most of the time! However, we shouldn’t get bogged down with our misdeeds of the past provided we repent and correct ourselves....

To understand Hakikat, we need to study both the Closed Book ( Kuran-i Kerim) and the Open Book (the created universe with all sorts of laws embedded within) and correlate each other. As Muslims our Ilm reaches the level of Marifet for we not only study the cause-effect relationships and leverage them but also understand, appreciate and then surrender to the ONLY ONE PRIME MOVER and the CREATOR of causes, effects and the underlying relations connecting them as per the PLAN/WISDOM etc....

Ve khairihi ve Sherrihi Minallahi Tevala - both Khair and Sher are under the Irade of ALLAH, but only in Khair is HIS Riza...
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom