Dalai Lama
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,628
- Reaction score
- -25
- Country
- Location
Lol, an old thread dug up and re-opened and people replying to it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
look at the date...
it's from today
He said the Gita had been taught in schools since 2007 and that some people were trying to create a controversy.
That minister is under fire. Going to be suspended soon. Moreover, case has been already registered on the same minister. This is India, you never know who becomes minister. Hopefully we can have more education.
Do not you teach Quran in your country than with what face you talk about this?
In your country govt bared minorities to enter their temple as you think their religion is not so important.
If anyone in Pakistan protest against teaching Quran he/she will be sentenced to death without delay.
Where were the Muslims and Christians then?
Also Bhagvad Gita is not the Holy Book of Hinduism.
It is a Brief of the Vedas.
Vedas is What Indian culture comes from.
Muslims and Christians are not going to bowed up in front of some other God.
Bhagvad Gita is only like Moral of the Stories.
nobody ever claimed Pakistan is secular
If you are not secular than stop thinking about those are.nobody ever claimed Pakistan is secular
while there have been issues surrounding minority rights (we dont deny it) ---there never has been a problem with minorities going to their places of worship.
When did government ban them from doing that? Christians go to their Mosques, Sikhs come (even from india) and go to their temples. In fact, the Katasraj hindu temple was renovated a few years back.
How many people accused of blasphemy? The law itself is a attack on minorities. no modern society can have such law. Religion based fighting riots are not new but a govt or society supporting such middle age law is bad.can you post some references to prove this claim?
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HCRP) - a voluntary organisation - has been documenting blasphemy cases. It says that Muslims constitute a majority of those booked under these laws, followed by the Ahmadi community. According to HRCP, since 1988 around 1,000 cases have been lodged for desecration of the Koran, while nearly 50 cases have been lodged for blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad. Lower courts have handed down hundreds of convictions in these cases, but nearly all of them have been reversed by the higher courts due to lack of evidence, faults in due process or obvious wrongful motives on the part of the complainants. Hundreds of Christians are among the accused - at least 12 of them were given the death sentence for blaspheming against the Prophet
BBC News - Q&A: Pakistan's controversial blasphemy laws
What did Jinnah, the Qaid say on 11 Aug 1947 to the Constitution Assembly?
Are you suggesting he did not know what he was saying?
If you are not secular than stop thinking about those are.
Really do you even know what happened to the minorities in Pakistan since independence? What was the percentage of them at that time and now? They should be there to suppress the minorities , you just removed them.
How many people accused of blasphemy? The law itself is a attack on minorities. no modern society can have such law. Religion based fighting riots are not new but a govt or society supporting such middle age law is bad.
there never has been a problem with minorities going to their places of worship.
Not only did he know what he was saying; but people who call themselves patriotic Pakistanis (myself included) dogmatically cling to those ideals.
I agree with our Father of the Nation --- people should be free to go to their Mosques, temples and other places of worship without interference by the state.
What's your point?
I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that spirit and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community, because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vashnavas, Khatris, also Bengalis, Madrasis and so on, will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence and but for this we would have been free people long long ago. No power can hold another nation, and specially a nation of 400 million souls in subjection; nobody could have conquered you, and even if it had happened, nobody could have continued its hold on you for any length of time, but for this. Therefore, we must learn a lesson from this. You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State. .................................
We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equal citizens of one State. The people of England in course of time had to face the realities of the situation and had to discharge the responsibilities and burdens placed upon them by the government of their country and they went through that fire step by step. Today, you might say with justice that Roman Catholics and Protestants do not exist; what exists now is that every man is a citizen, an equal citizen of Great Britain and they are all members of the Nation.
Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State.
Text of Jinnah's 11th August Speech | Pak Tea House
Didn't get it when it is crystal clear.
The short answer is - that is what is secularism, which you appear to be questioning.
That is to refresh your memory.
And also tell you that is what is meant by secularism.
Got the point, now?
and maybe you're either blind or just overlooked thousands of posts I have made in favour of such ideals; though at the same time i am not in a position to enact or repeal the laws (it isnt my goal or my interest)
I wouldnt exactly be averse to adding (for further clarification, unless you're still confused) that Jinnah Sahib wouldnt be happy if he knew about some of the ongoing political or religious issues in Pakistan. But unlike you people, we dont deny our problems. We admit them openly and discuss them (like what we do on this forum)
however I dont think that the religious discrimination taking place in Pakistan is anywhere even remotely NEAR the amount of it taking place in india; nor is the communal problem in Pakistan any worse than what it is in india...if it was, we'd have had many Gujrats by now, which luckily, we have not.
as for the Sikh thing you posted, that article is over 7 years old. You are well aware that Sikhs are very much free to practice their religion in Pakistan. In fact, many many Sikh pilgrims come by train from hindustan annually --since many of their holy sites are in Pakistani soil. They face no problems at all.
Dont take my word for it though.
Sikhs find peace in northwest Pakistan - Middle East - Al Jazeera English