What's new

SEAL shirt from Bin Laden raid in Pak goes on show

third eye

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
18,519
Reaction score
13
Country
India
Location
India
SEAL shirt from Bin Laden raid in Pakistan goes on show – The Express Tribune

759501-OsamaBinLaden-1410162641-511-640x480.JPG


NEW YORK: A shirt worn by a member of the Navy SEAL team during the clandestine raid that killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in 2011 went on show in New York on Sunday.

The garment is part of an exhibition at the National September 11 Memorial & Museum portraying the decade-long hunt to find the al Qaeda mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks.

The black and brown uniform shirt worn by the anonymous Team Six member during the daring raid on bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad has a US flag patch on the sleeve.

But the decision to display the SEAL shirt has been criticised.

Newsweek said the exhibition was out of place, “short-circuiting the grief that rightly haunts these galleries,” a tribute to the nearly 3,000 people killed in the September 11, 2001 terror attacks on New York and Washington.

“The good guys won, it says triumphantly… But that’s cheap closure, and it seems crass to parade the evidence of our victory in what should be a space for somber, silent thought and prayer,” it wrote in an article.

The museum defended the move.

“This exhibit not only captures a seminal moment in American history, it also allows millions of visitors the chance to recognize the extraordinary bravery of the men and women who sacrifice so much for this country,” 9/11 Memorial President Joe Daniels said.

The exhibition also includes a “challenge coin” donated by “Maya,” the alias for the CIA operative who pursued the al Qaeda leader, and a brick recovered from the bin Laden compound.

The brick, donated by a Fox News journalist, has been on show since the museum opened its doors to members of the public in May.

The challenge coin was created to commemorate the operation and is marked with May 1, 2011, the date in the United States when bin Laden was killed – in the early hours of May 2 in Pakistan.

The other side shows a red “X” in reference to the red X that president George W Bush put through the names of key al Qaeda operatives after they were found, arrested or killed, the museum said.

The museum, built into the bedrock of the World Trade Center Twin Towers, documents the attacks, their impact and legacy with 10,000 artifacts.

Daniels said he had had “the distinct honour” to meet the man who wore the shirt into the airborne raid on bin Laden’s home.

“I thank him and ‘Maya’ – both for their bravery, courage and determination, which provided a measure of justice for every single American, and for entrusting us with these artifacts of such national and international importance,” he said.

More than 900,000 people have visited the museum since it opened and more than 15 million have visited the outside 9/11 Memorial, which opened three years ago.
 
. . . . .
Yet no ''hard evidence'' has been presented to prove OBL's death on this particular date.
If you say evidence, what do you literally mean? You want evidence for osama raid, you want evidence for 26/11 attacks etc etc. No matter what is put before you as evidence, you still deny it. What will you achieve by doing so...only giving strength to the commonly believed notion that pakistan shields terrorists.
 
.
If you say evidence, what do you literally mean? You want evidence for osama raid, you want evidence for 26/11 attacks etc etc. No matter what is put before you as evidence, you still deny it. What will you achieve by doing so...only giving strength to the commonly believed notion that pakistan shields terrorists.

A 'Hard Evidence' is a piece of information that can establish the authencity of the claims made in regards to a particular event, through independently counterchecked forensics, ballistics, audio visual and DNA tests.

None of the above has been made available citing absurd reasons, and as per my own information, if it is correct, no such hard evidence will EVER be made available...not even to OBL's victims.
 
Last edited:
.
A 'Hard Evidence' is a piece of information that can establish the authencity of the claims made in regards to a particular event, through independently counterchecked forensics, ballistics, audio visual and DNA tests.

None of the above has been made available citing absurd reasons, and as per my own information, if it is correct, no such hard evidence will EVER be made available...not even to OBL's victims.
Ofcourse it wont be made available. And you knowing it still ask? What's the point? You have evidence in the form of breach in your air defences. The rotor tail you returned to the US which carried the seals. The polio team which confirmed OBLs presence in that building apart from other proofs. You ask for something which you cant get and say others as not evidence. If this is not meant as denial, then what is it?
 
.
A 'Hard Evidence' is a piece of information that can establish the authencity of the claims made in regards to a particular event, through independently counterchecked forensics, ballistics, audio visual and DNA tests.

Half of OBL's brain freshly spattered on the wall was not enough for these tests?
 
.
Ofcourse it wont be made available. And you knowing it still ask? What's the point? You have evidence in the form of breach in your air defences. The rotor tail you returned to the US which carried the seals. The polio team which confirmed OBLs presence in that building apart from other proofs. You ask for something which you cant get and say others as not evidence. If this is not meant as denial, then what is it?

That is part of the script based on opinions not science, which is why it can't be called a fact.

Ofcourse it wont be made available. And you knowing it still ask? What's the point? You have evidence in the form of breach in your air defences. The rotor tail you returned to the US which carried the seals. The polio team which confirmed OBLs presence in that building apart from other proofs. You ask for something which you cant get and say others as not evidence. If this is not meant as denial, then what is it?

That is part of the script based on opinions not science, which is why it can't be called a fact.

Half of OBL's brain freshly spattered on the wall was not enough for these tests?

The alleged incident is a dirty secret closely guarded by the CIA and ISI.

ISI collected his alleged wives too, however we don't know their names, images nor their whereabouts...the complex was demolished later on.

As members of public, we need to know exactly what happened that night. If they have proofs, they should make some of it public.

If Obama thinks that everyone is convinced over his little story, than he's fooling himself.
 
Last edited:
. .
The alleged incident is a dirty secret closely guarded by the CIA and ISI.
ISI collected his alleged wives too, however we don't know their names, images nor their whereabouts...the complex was demolished later on.
As members of public, we need to know exactly what happened that night. If they have proofs, they should make some of it public.
If Obama thinks that everyone is convinced over his little story, than he's fooling himself.

What ISI did is for reasons best known to itself. That raid was pretty open from the US point of view, with lots of evidence left, including the tail of a secret chopper. Remember that?
 
. .
Then whats your opinion about the raid on that day and the crashed helicopter?

You didn't understand my question.

The operation did take place, the helis did come, one of them crashed.

The question is to establish the identity of OBL through forensics, ballistics and audio visual science rather than 'eye witnesses'.

Here is something for you to think about.

Imagine if OBL was killed by SSG instead of US SEALS, what would have been the aftermath for Pakistan?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom