Gomig-21
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 7,901
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
In the End...whatever they are right or wrong..; it's their choice. and tbh, they already hve problems in their countries... with terro... they will not spend any more "support" to fight someone else mess...
Then they should, first and foremost, not criticize the others who are members. That's #1. #2, don't expect any form of support in return. They can laugh all they want about it, but if and when the time comes where their country is embroiled in some major dilemma, they'll need to remember that they're not a priority.
As for this alliance... I..myself doubt it's meaning and his capacity to answer problems...when even btw them they are not entirely alligned...
And this will help that cause, hence the term "alliance." It has to start somewhere.
Many Question is still needed to be answered... Are they going to fight by sending boots where tero is? Will thisnew group be used in Yemen to continue their mess? Will they help funding states of this alliance to buy new equipment or else to help them fight it in thir own lands alone? or is it just a political stunt...saying " Here we are? and you? Where are you and with who?"
It's all of the above. If you look through history, alliances go a long way in creating coalitions and pacts of support for member nations. The support comes in all forms, from money to intel to military assistance to economic assistance to diplomatic assistance and so on and so forth. There are only benefits to something like this.
I have my share of opinion on it also...
As you can see also..; the alliance is quite centric... where are the north central Asian countries? per exemple? or Indonesia? etc...
Someone has to be the base, and who is more qualified than the custodians of the center of Islam? That's how the world works and in this case, besides being the custodians of Islam's holiest sites, the current country with the most clout and outreach in the region is Saudiya and it's only right that it leads the parade. But if you look at the appointing of the alliance's leader, what does that tell you? It's on the right track. Raheel Sharif is not an Arab, but a Muslim, and Pakistan is not an enemy of Iran by any means, quite the opposite. So the twisting of "agenda-basing" and Saudi-centric is completely unfounded. This is the new version of the Arab Republic but instead of limiting it to a nationality based organization, it's based on Muslim nations which is the best thing possible to unite us all. This is the biggest difference (among many others) in what Nasser tried to do and failed miserably because he only wanted an Arab unity, whereas a Muslim one makes complete sense and why it will be very successful.
There will always be negatives about everything, but in this case, the positives completely outweigh the negative. I can see why some would doubt the intentions, but to completely ignore the obvious is simply crazy.
And most countries have not the logictics, neither equipment to take part on any fronts outside of their lands.. like Tunisia per exemple... she doesn't have enought for hers let alone to send away...
And that's the whole point! It gives what it can and when it's in need, the countries that have the logistic capabilities come to its aid. It's not that complicated walahi!
But i think the most important point is the lack of Doctrine and Ideology behind it... and Fighting Terrorism is not one of them... it' s just a result of smthing/someone... but not that "Smthing/one"
How can you say terrorism is not one of them? That's crazy bro what do you base that on? It's the #1 thing about this whole alliance. This thing just formed and already we're judging not only its intentions but the results? It will take a little time just like anything else.