because......
outside help or outside agenda? NATO! Those NATO agendas that Ukraine adopted and embraced and wished for because its a low self esteem nation cost it a 3rd of its country...bye bye weak bich azz Ukraine...darwinism came for Ukraine.
Why do you even bother replying to me? It never ends well for you.
you wish....what can NATO or Ukraine even do about it? apparently nothing!
whats the evidence its powerless? we know Ukraine cant even hold Bakhmut, talk less of controlling any territories near those water bodies, Putin made a smart and intuitive move.
because your arguments are too bad for me to ignore, any other questions?
for me or for your crappy and emotional arguments?
you posted that tweet from Theresa here on pdf the onus is upon you to check if Sec Def made that statement and verify the context in which that statement was made.
The question is, how can Russia enforce it? Because it can't. Their ships are already under attack in the area, so this decree is toothless.
Russia can't even hold Russian territory, Russian partisans had to leave on their own for Russian to regain control over its territory.
No, it's because I truth hurts your little feelings and you can't stand the fact that your side is losing, so you have to be an internet troll to defend Russia's honor.
You can call my arguments whatever you want, but the truth is that you've never once won against me, and it always ends up badly for you.
simple Russia doesn't want to waste PGM's on targets on home soil. It's obvious the Russians don't have much training on dropping unguided munitions.
you really think this happened? it's fake, from DCS world a game... Mr SC.
What psychological impact: Ukrainian people are going about their business adjusted to wartime. They support the president building support. And its outdated S300 Defence between supplemented by next generation systems at scale that Russia attacks less frequently the infrastructure. It lobs 20 missiles , cause minimal damage and then 4 days later lob another 20 with less destruction than what Russia could inflect 5 months ago before the new systems arrived.
So where is the proof with the Russian claim that Patriot is destroyed when subsequent attacks cause no infrastructure damage? I agree you should not believe the Ukrainians but then every thing out of Russia is a lie Too. Just because Russians ‘wished’ for a patriot to be destroyed by their invincible missiles, they SHOULD provide proof.
They lost 20%, but they kept the other 80%. Same way Taliban lost the major cities but kept the majority of rest of the country. Losing 20% with a chance to win some of it back vs. Guaranteeing losing 100% to Russia to live under Russians , seems like an easy choice
This is the equivalent of telling children certain fairy tales are not real. What you did was cruel. He was happy that Russian pilots are the best, now you ruined him.
Actually, no.
I usually chose reputable tweeter accounts.. if they slip on something sometimes.. that is not my fault as I never post false claims or false tweets deliberately as you are thinking.. that is not me at all..believe it or not..
it's really simple PGM's are expensive and too precious to use when you don't have to worry about opposition (SAM or counter air) and collateral damage on home soil.
