Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really most of ww1 was a stalemate what brought USA into war was unrestricted submarine warfare and the zimmerman telegraph. But usa joining the war basically a jackpot for the allies.
Germany and its allies even before the Americans joined were not doing so good. Ottoman Empire was on the retreat same with Austria-Hungary which has been crippled ever since Brusilov Offensive while Bulgaria cant offer much due to its region. Germany was getting exhausted before the Americans came Kaiserslact was successful but the Germans have all but exhausted themselves to the point where they cant continue the war.
If Americans didn't enter WW1 in 1917 Germany would have won. Britain was on its last legs.
Russian forces are legally present in Syria. Turkish forces are not.Look who is talking. Russian war planes are killing innocent children every day. Is that legal??
Look who is talking. Russian war planes are killing innocent children every day. Is that legal??
Not really because Britain had Germany under blockade. If Germany won the battle of Jutland and destroyed most of the Royal Navy's fleet and then use submarines to fully strangle Britains naval trade routes along with sinking merchant ships. Because if Germany sank most of the British navy's ships then there will be no ships to protect their merchant fleets and trade routes along with supply routes.
Battle of Jutland could have broken Britain but Germany has all but failed in that even if they damage Britains navy along with its presitge it was not enough to cripple the Royal Navy.
I think you are talking about France. France technically was on its last legs.
I hope you're joking. Considering that Russia sees Turkey as an important cog in NATO's gear that doesnt seem fully vested in NATO, i think the opposite is at play- Russia wil give Turkey whatever Turkey wants, if Russia believes or thinks that will make Turkey either leave NATO, or trust it less, or make it more endeared towards Russia. If Turkey asks for more S400s, Russia will provide them.Maybe Russia will stop supply of S-400 or spares if some dont comply.
And Assad did, which was legal, so whats your point?Nobody called Russia to come to syria apart from ***-ad begging for help.
what makes it illegal?Lol Russian deployment in Syria is legal?
1. You're exaggerating 2. This is war, nasty things happen. Have you made posts on PDF criticizing US killing civilians in Afghanistan yet? i bet you havent so stop being a hypocrite. SOme of you only care about Assad killing children while other conflicts and wars also have great powers killing civilians and children too but you keep quiet.Russian war planes are killing innocent children every day.
Tell that to the Americans.
But on land British could not beat Germans so they begged Americans to enter the war and beat Germans on land.
Germans could not beat the British in the seas. We seen how that turned out when Britain blockaded Germany which basically contributed to Germany's defeat.
I have criticized US killing children in Afganistan and Iraq and Pakistan. I have criticized Saudia killing children in Yamen. Now, you clearly seem to be butt hurt by me mentioning the fact that the pig named Assad and Russia are killing children. Atleast US and Saudi have the decency not to cluster bomb and barrel bomb their own citizens. Assad is killing those people whom he was supposed to protect. He is killing people just to save his tyrant regime and it is a fact and whole world knows it. The wort of all criminals.1. You're exaggerating 2. This is war, nasty things happen. Have you made posts on PDF criticizing US killing civilians in Afghanistan yet? i bet you havent so stop being a hypocrite. SOme of you only care about Assad killing children while other conflicts and wars also have great powers killing civilians and children too but you keep quiet.
Being legaly present does not justify the illegal war crimes. At least Turkish forces are not barrel bombing the civilian areas. And what is the legality of Assad (who called in the Russians) when his own people have waged a war against him and he is killing them indiscriminately?Russian forces are legally present in Syria. Turkish forces are not.
Agree. But find one war where there hasn't been war crimes?Being legaly present does not justify the illegal war crimes.
Most militant opposition to the Syrian Government consisted of 50,000+ foreign Islamist jihadists backed by KSA/Qatar/US/Israel. Not really a "civil war".And what is the legality of Assad (who called in the Russians) when his own people have waged a war against him and he is killing them indiscriminately?
Your statement shows as if Syria was attacked by foreign terrorists backed by the said countries. Which is clearly a WRONG statement.Most militant opposition to the Syrian Government consisted of 50,000+ foreign Islamist jihadists backed by KSA/Qatar/US/Israel. Not really a "civil war".
Turkey don't need S-400. Russia can refuse to sell Su-35 to Turkey if they do not leave. Turkey is under sanction by US and EU and China so their F-16 won't last long without spare parts.
Blockade but cannot take land. If Americans didn't enter WW1 Germany would have won on land.