What's new

Russia is under attack as someone is attempting to open the Finland front This could trigger another invasion

I don't think those small countries feared Russia for its nuclear arsenal. They feared Russia for its conventional war machine, which it has successfully used quite a few times on its neighbors, until now.
For a nation that burnt its capital Moscow to defeat Napoleon and used human wave tactics to defeat Nazi, I can not say the threshold of using nuke for Russia will be too high

If joining Nato means that Russian conventional forces are hand tied then so be it. But creating bad relations with your neighbours leaves endless low intensity conflicts and tensions, case in point Palestine and Kashmir. This drains resource, development and money. If Finland is willing to become a front line state and endure this it's their choice.
Agree. That's why I think Russia, even is at difficult time, should teach Finland a lesson. Which will set another example for the other countries that joining in NATO is a nightmare.
 
Last edited:
.
For a nation that burnt its capital Moscow to defeat Napoleon and used human wave tactics to defeat Nazi, I can not say the threshold of using nuke for Russia will be too high


Agree. That's why I think Russia, even is at difficult time, should teach Finland a lesson. Which will set another example for the other countries that joining in NATO is a nightmare.
Unless China joins the war I see no success in Russia blitzkrieg against Finland.

Putin needs oil, dollars, ready to eat meals, and everything else.

War is costly.

Will you chinese do it?
 
.
Unless China joins the war I see no success in Russia blitzkrieg against Finland.

Putin needs oil, dollars, ready to eat meals, and everything else.

War is costly.

Will you chinese do it?
China will not join in the war. All China should do is supplying Russia everything except weapons.
 
.
. . .
China will not join in the war. All China should do is supplying Russia everything except weapons.
What supplies? What can China deliver? And even though you want to deliver everything;
Oil, gas, foods, weapons? Russia has plentiful. Putin needs none.
 
.
What supplies? What can China deliver? And even though you want to deliver everything;
Oil, gas, foods, weapons? Russia has plentiful. Putin needs none.

Wing Loong 2 has SATCOM enabling extended range recon and strike. Currently, Russian drones don't have SATCOM.
 
.
Would Finland even need help against a Russia whose airforce is garbage?

They have 55 F/A-18 18s and almost 1000 AMRAAMs. More than enough to take out hundreds of Russian planes


Size of Finnish Army is 20,000 and they can within days increase this to 40,000 if they call up reservists.
With full mobilisation the Finns could get to nearly 300,000 men within 1-2 months.

Finnish army has 200 Leopard tanks that are a lot better than any tank that Russia currently field. In total around 250 tanks better than anything Russia has.

Russia would face the same humiliation that happened to Stalin when he attacked Finland in 1939.

Are you @mmr's alt account ?
 
.
Winter war. The Find destroyed the soviets who has amongst the best armies at the time.

The Fins are tough fighters. They would have ample forest cover and would fight using insurgent tactics.
 
.
If I was Putin I would try to off ramp Ukraine with whatever best case realistic scenario he can manage.

Regroup and learn from mistakes.

And plan with China for the emerging world order. (Looking at the map, they can make things very interesting for the Western Pacific if they plan properly)

Whatever he does, he should make sure Russia doesn't get dragged into a long campaign of attrition in Ukraine.

Which is exactly what the West wants to happen it's looking like.

The US is playing a very high stake game here.
But its probably been calculated. The prize could be another century of US global preminence.

Basically tie down Russia and its resources in eastern europe, Russian western flank, with minimal use of US military resources.
Then Proceed to take on China in East Asia. US is now free to fully concentrate on China.

Its a win win strategy for US and partly also UK. Kill two birds with one stone. Both continental Europe and Russia is bogged down. Europe could be forced to cut off Russian oil and gas, and import more from USA and its allies.

China now facing might of US Navy cannot hope for the same support from a Russia that is busy in European theathre.

The reason this grand US strategy, which is something i contemplated in my own mind, is risky, is because Europe may decide to sign a peace agreement with Russia akin to Molotov-Ribbentropp. Which in turn could make the whole Eurasian landmass more united and potentially make US victory in East Asia less likely to happen.
 
.
Then Proceed to take on China in East Asia. US is now free to fully concentrate on China.

Chinese men have highest IQ in the world. China is world's oldest continuous civilization. China mainland spans 4,900+ km, bigger than the US mainland. China is overwhelmingly ethnically homogeneous, the US is only 55% white. The US has no power to take down China in order to unify the human race under a single hegemony.
 
.
Chinese men have highest IQ in the world. China is world's oldest continuous civilization. China mainland spans 4,900+ km, bigger than the US mainland. China is overwhelmingly ethnically homogeneous, the US is only 55% white. The US has no power to take down China in order to unify the human race under a single hegemony.

Agree that China is no easy task for America.
But history shows that no nation is invincible. That applies both to USA and China
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom