What's new

RSS outfit wants Manusmriti reworked

.
Not sure about now but it did have religious relevance then.
Religious relevance how its just social rules of king Manu 3000 years old Like all civilizations Romans, Egyptians,Babylonians have in those times



Even in modern Europe women are not allowed vote up till late nineteenth century

Its more of Social rules which has relevant according to social values of those times Not religion

As Society evolved With time So are the rules
 
. .
Religious relevance how its just social rules of king Manu 3000 years old Like all civilizations Romans, Egyptians,Babylonians have in those times



Even in modern Europe women are not allowed vote up till late nineteenth century

Its more of Social rules which has relevant according to social values of those times Not religion

As Society evolved With time So are the rules
Social rules are influenced by religion. It was the case with Romans, Egyptians and it was also the case with Europeans.

It's a matter of research.
Itne saare cheez toh hai India me hai research karne, why flog a dead horse.:undecided:
 
.
Social rules are influenced by religion. It was the case with Romans, Egyptians and it was also the case with Europeans.
So How It relevant in present Day!!!Like i said as time involved rules are changed

in Modern India Which run by Constitutional rules by Govt elected by people How manu smiriti relevant
 
. .
So How It relevant in present Day!!!Like i said as time involved rules are changed

in Modern India Which run by Constitutional rules by Govt elected by people How manu smiriti relevant
If it's not relevant now, why is it being reworked?

What do we get out of this? Research isn't done for nothing. It is done to get some kind of output/ benefit for mankind.
 
. .
Why not mate, these people and the party they croon for have being commenting/maligning muslims. Shouldn't they be paid in kind.

Just look at the triple talaaqs threads opened by these "very concerned" individuals.

They should rather put their house in order before pointing fingers at others.
Whatever makes you happy man. Anyway, I just expressed my view. I stay out of such threads.

FYI I'm against Tripple Talaq. Let the supreme court decide on it. If other comment on it, doesn't mean we need to pay back. Throwing crap on each other only makes both parties stink.
 
.
Are you telling me that there was no opposition when Hindu laws were reformed. It was Sangh and many Hindutva leaders who fought tooth and nail against the reformation. Here are a few excerpts for you

"These bills aroused strong opposition from the Hindu nationalists. In Parliament N.C. Chatterjee, the Hindu Mahasabha leader, and S.P. Mokerjee protested vehemently against what they took to be a threat to file stability and integrity of traditional forms of marriage and the family in Hindu society.


Source: Nehru And The Hindu Code Bill - Outlook India

So you see, furore was created even then.


So is the reservation given to Hindu backwards not based on religion? Why should a Hindu backward get reservation but not a muslim/christian backward?

Lol. There was opposition to banning of Sati too. But the law was passed and implemented. And Hindus have accepted it. So what stops you from supporting the banning of instance talaq?

A direct question to you- Do u support instant divorce, polygamy, Nikah halala or underage marriage of Muslim girls?
Yes or No.


Second regarding to reservation- For ex, there can be a Jat Hindu or a Jat Muslim or Jat Christian. The caste is the same irrespective of religion. Jat as a whole are covered under OBC irrespective of religion. So you want a separate reservation for Muslims alone irrespective of castes creating injustice for students from the same caste but other religion. Is it even fair? Dont talk as if Muslims are not under reservation. Muslims are already reserved according to their caste in OBC and SC.
 
.
If it's not relevant now, why is it being reworked?
Because Most interpretation of Manusmriti are done by Sir William jones Which has rare Knowledge about sanskrit transcripts in those times

May be RSS wants an authentic compilation of historical transcripts of ancient history of Hinduism

Same is conducted by Banaras hindu university or aligarh Muslim university or jamia milia islamia JNU

It there prerogative RSS is interdependent organisation and free to do whatever they want

Such AIMPLB or others
 
.
Really? Have you seen some research papers from JNU?
No I haven't, please enlighten me:)

Because Most interpretation of Manusmriti are done by Sir William jones Which has rare Knowledge about sanskrit transcripts in those times

May be RSS wants an authentic compilation of historical transcripts of ancient history of Hinduism

Same is conducted by Banaras hindu university or aligarh Muslim university or jamia milia islamia JNU

It there prerogative RSS is interdependent organisation and free to do whatever they want

Such AIMPLB or others
Well indeed, they can research anything they like. But I hope the tax payer's money is not wasted on this.
 
.
Well indeed, they can research anything they like. But I hope the tax payer's money is not wasted on this.
Like I said Many university Like Jamia & Aligarh University Do research on Islamic history on Central govt funds provided to them

In this case Sanskrit Bharati (RSS) made tie Up with Union govt For historical Study on Manusmiriti transcripts The study will be Public Property Like All intellectual studies & Research i think there Should be No objection In this :-)
 
.
Lol. There was opposition to banning of Sati too. But the law was passed and implemented. And Hindus have accepted it. So what stops you from supporting the banning of instance talaq?
I don't think muslim leaders/politicians passed and implemented the law banning Sati, it came from within liberal Hindus and was more acceptable to Hindus. What is happening now? Its the hardline hindutva leaders who are creating more noise than liberal muslims themselves. So it is natural that Indian muslims will be more defensive about this. Wasn't tinkering with religious sensibilities one of the reason for 1857?

A direct question to you- Do u support instant divorce, polygamy, Nikah halala or underage marriage of Muslim girls?
Yes or No.
No, I don't and I want it gone irrespective of how prevalent they are but at the same time, I don't like Sanghis loons imposing their will.

Second regarding to reservation- For ex, there can be a Jat Hindu or a Jat Muslim or Jat Christian. The caste is the same irrespective of religion. Jat as a whole are covered under OBC irrespective of religion. So you want a separate reservation for Muslims alone irrespective of castes creating injustice for students from the same caste but other religion. Is it even fair? Dont talk as if Muslims are not under reservation. Muslims are already reserved according to their caste in OBC and SC.
Do you think all muslims get reservation? The answer is no. Its certain sections among muslims who get reservation very much like Hindus. So why does BJP make so much noise when the backwards among muslims get reservation. Look at the below instance

Even after High court upheld muslim reservation, BJP govt scraps it. So you see where the rut lies.

Bombay HC stays Maratha quota, upholds Muslim reservation in education

Devendra Fadnavis government scraps quota for Muslims in education
 
.
Like I said Many university Like Jamia & Aligarh University Do research on Islamic history on Central govt funds provided to them

In this case Sanskrit Bharati (RSS) made tie Up with Union govt For historical Study on Manusmiriti transcripts The study will be Public Property Like All intellectual studies & Research i think there Should be No objection In this :-)
So my question is why do they need to study it? What is it's relevance in today. The below is what the OP states

“We are debating the removal of portions from the Manusmriti, which are anti-Dalit and anti-woman and often quoted in arguments against Hindu scriptures,” he said.

“There are some references in Manusmriti where some objectionable things have been mentioned. It should be deleted. We do not support them. We have to see Manusmriti in today’s context. We will suggest to the government that they look into this,” said Chand.

So what is it that RSS is trying to suggest to the government? Why does it want to see Manusmriti in today's concept?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom